News

Will Elon Musk Save Humanity?

One of Elon Musk’s boldest ambitions is to colonise Mars. But what is driving the world’s richest man to try and save humanity by liberating it from Earth? The drive to explore the universe and somehow throw off the corruption of our current situation has featured throughout human history. But as Musk and others seek to save humanity from itself, there are underlying truths to humanity’s curious, but imperfect nature that point not to Mars, but to Heaven itself.

Share

Please share this video widely with friends or family and for more Short Answers videos, visit solas-cpc.org/shortanswers/, subscribe to our YouTube channel or visit us on Twitter, Instagram or Facebook.

Support

Short Answers is a viewer-supported video series: if you enjoy them, please help us continue to make them by donating to Solas. Visit our Donate page and choose a free book as a thank-you gift!

Have You Ever Wondered Why We Struggle With Guilt and Shame?

Imagine sitting with a group of friends, when someone suggests as a conversation starter: ‘Tell us the most embarrassing thing that ever happened to you?”  Initially, people feel uncomfortable.  But soon the stories are flowing, eliciting a mixture of laughter and sympathy.  After all, we’ve all had the experience of feeling red-faced and wishing the ground would open up underneath us to save us from the embarrassment.

However, imagine the reaction if a slightly different question were posed: “What is the worst thing you have ever done?”  Probably the air would grow cold and conversation dry up as everyone is seized with fear.  Answering that question, truthfully, runs the risk of being judged, rejected and condemned.  Rather than triggering the feeling of embarrassment, it rouses our sense of guilt and shame. Deep down we’re all afraid that if people knew the truth about us then they wouldn’t love us.

Many of us know what it is like to struggle with a secret sense of guilt or suffocating sense of shame.  Although related, these two things can be distinguished.  Guilt says: ‘I have done something wrong’.  Shame says: “There is something wrong with me”.  Guilt is triggered when our behaviour falls short of an objective standard dividing right and wrong, justice and injustice, good and evil.  Shame is the subjective sense of pain that I am unworthy of being loved because of the things I have done or experienced.

Over the centuries, people have sought to find an escape from the crippling effects of guilt and shame.  Often they have blamed religion for making people feel bad about themselves, particularly Christianity with its concern about personal sin.  Perhaps they could point to the central character in John Bunyan’s famous story “The Pilgrim’s Progress.”  Christian is seeking freedom from the burden of sin that he carries around on his back.  He became aware of his sin and its potential to sink him down from the grave into hell after reading about it the Bible[1].

In the story he finds release at the Cross of Jesus Christ.  However, in our world people have suggested alternative ways to remove the burden of sin, guilt and shame from our backs.  For example, the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche denied that sin existed – believing that a release from guilt would come when people realised that “God is dead” and consequently there is no moral objective moral standard that stands in judgement over our lives.[2]  An alternative solution offered by the psychologist Sigmund Freud was to redefine sin – arguing it is not a moral problem, instead it’s a psychological or emotional problem.[3]  He wanted to liberate his patients from their over-active consciences, informed by religious beliefs, to accept and express their deepest desires rather than repress them as sinful.

However, it’s noticeable that none of these alternative strategies have worked!  We are still a society that is gripped in the vice of moral guilt and shame.  In fact, our guilt and shame have metastasised to even greater proportions.  Now we are made to feel guilty and ashamed about the food we eat, the clothes we wear, the places we shop, the ways we travel, the opinions we hold, the injustices of our ancestors.  But the problem is that there is no end to the possible reparations, no way to keep up with the demands of righteousness, and no means of forgiveness for our failures.  Like Lady Macbeth, we cannot cleanse our hands from the “damned spot” of our sins.[4]

The reason that we cannot escape the moral sense of sense is because we don’t live in a universe of mindless, meaningless matter that exists purely by time, chance and natural selection.  Instead, we live in a moral universe that has been crafted and ruled over by a morally good God.

Life works best when we live in line with the moral grain of the universe and life breaks down when we work against it.  Our conscience, like the umpire in tennis, calls us “in” or “out” in the moral game of life.  It convicts and makes us feel guilt and shame about our sin.

The Russian novelist Dostoyevsky explores this inescapable moral reality in the novel “Crime and Punishment”.[5]  It tells the story of a young student called Raskolnikov, who attempts to pull off the perfect crime.  Although he successfully murders and robs a rich old woman, and avoids being arrested by the police; he cannot escape his own conscience, which in the end leads him to confess and confess his guilt to the police.

The fact is that we all sin (guilt) and all are sinners (shame).  If you still need any convincing of that fact, then listen to Francis Spufford’s contemporary definition for sin, the HPtFtU: “the human propensity to ***k things up”.[6]  The fact is that none of us is perfect.  None of us live up to our ideals, let alone God’s.

Another Francis (Schaeffer, this time) once pointed out that as moral beings living in a moral universe, we cannot avoid setting moral standards for others.  We expect other people to behave certain ways and treat us in good ways; and we judge them and express disappointment in them when they fail to live up to those standards.  But the problem is that so often we fail to live up to our own standards – we are very good at living in hypocrisy.[7]  We don’t need God to pronounce us sinners according to His standards, when we often fail to live up to our own standards!

But there is good news for sinful, guilty, ashamed people like you and me.  The Bible is not the problem; rather the Bible contains the solution.  Without the Bible we still know we’re sinners; but with the Bible we are introduced to a Saviour from sin.  The Bible is not just a moral rule book – because moral rules can only condemn, never forgive.  It is the true story of the gracious love of God who forgives and transforms sinners.  At the centre of that story is the divine person of Jesus Christ.

Jesus knows the truth about us – the worst things we have done or have had done against us.  But rather than judging and dismissing us.  Instead, He has set His love upon us and come into this world to save us.  In His life, Jesus is the only person who has ever lived up to God’s moral standards – He never sinned.  In His death, Jesus has suffered the moral judgement and condemnation that our sins deserved.  And in His resurrection, Jesus has proclaimed the good news: “There is now no condemnation for those who are in Christ Jesus” (Roman 8:1) … “If we confess our sins, God is faithful and just to forgive our sins and cleanse us from all unrighteousness” (1 John 1:8)

Jesus makes it possible for us to be honest about our sins, to receive forgiveness for our sins, and to be transformed to become more like Himself, the sin-less One.  That’s why the former slave-trader and notorious sinful sailor John Newton burst out in song: “Amazing grace, how sweet the sound, that saved a wretch like me”.[8]

So if – like Christian in Bunyan’s tale – you feel crushed by the burden of guilt and shame, then come to the Cross of Jesus – there you can be set free!

[1] John Bunyan, ‘The Pilgrim’s Progress’ (Oxford University Press: Oxford, 1966) at p1-2.

[2] Friedrich Nietzsche, ‘The Gay Science,’ translated by Thomas Common (Dover Publications: New York, 2006) Book 3 Section 125.

[3] Sigmund Freud, ‘The Future of an Illusion,’ translated by James Strachey (W.W. Norton: New York, 1961) at p.43-45.

[4] William Shakespeare, ‘The Tragedy of Macbeth’ at Act 5 Scene 1 (accessed online 8th November 2024: https://shakespeare.mit.edu/macbeth/macbeth.5.1.html)

[5] Fyodor Dostoyevsky, ‘Crime and Punishment’ (Oxford University Press: Oxford, 1998).

[6] Francis Spufford, ‘Unapologetic: Why, despite everything, Christianity can still make surprising emotional sense’ (Faber and Faber: London, 2012) at p.26.

[7] Francis Schaeffer, ‘Death in the City’ (Inter-Varsity Press: London, 1969) at p.98-99.

[8] John Newton, ‘Amazing Grace’ (Public Domain: 1623).


Have You Ever Wondered? is also the title of our popular book and a series of articles and videos on this website. With intriguing answers to questions as diverse as ‘Have You Ever Wondered’ why we are drawn to beauty, respect altruism, value the environment, preserve the past, chase money, love music and defend human rights?; the book has a wide range of authors who’s wonderings have drawn them to spiritual and Christian answers to their investigations. With free copies available for people who sign-up to support Solas for as little as £3/month, and big discounts for bulk orders – Have You Ever Wondered? is an effective and affordable way to engage in helpful spiritual discussions.

Gavin and the Chatty Chappies

A few months ago I was invited to appear as a guest on the Chatty Chappies radio show, which goes out on Heartsong FM in the Glasgow area. I had known Brian, the presenter, years ago when he lived in the Perth area – and he invited me on the programme initially after he had read Have You Ever Wondered? That book, looks at all sorts of questions that people are asking today, such as those surrounding love, beauty, truth, justice, the environment, suffering, music, and gently suggests that these are all ultimately ‘God-questions’ which point to him. Brian was intrigued, and invited me on the show. In the programme itself he did mention the book a few times but also asked about a whole range of other things too, about Solas, the state of the church and more. It was a really enjoyable conversation which was captured on YouTube, because Heartsong doesn’t have a ‘listen-again’ archive.

Heartsong is available online here. Brian and Andrew, the Chatty Chappies themselves, have a page here. And Have You Ever Wondered? can be found by clicking here.

PEP Talk with Rhiannon McAleer

Today on PEP Talk, Andy and Kristi learn about the Lumino research project from the Bible Society. Its in-depth surveys and analysis offer great insight into attitudes towards the Bible. What can it tell us about Biblical literacy, relevance and attractiveness across UK society? And what should we keep in mind as we help introduce others to the message of Jesus in the Bible?

The Lumino project surveyed 20,000 people to find out what they thought about Christianity, the Bible and faith. Explore its resources and insights here.

With Rhiannon McAleer PEP Talk

Our Guest

Dr Rhiannon McAleer is Director of Research and Impact at the Bible Society. After completing her PhD at the University of Exeter, Rhiannon worked for a number of charities including Meningitis Now and the British Red Cross. Since joining Bible Society, Rhiannon has led innovative research projects on belief, Christianity and the Bible. She leads the Research and Impact team, which is responsible for producing high-quality insight to support Bible Society and the wider Church in mission. She and her husband live in Gloucestershire with their two daughters.

About PEP Talk

The Persuasive Evangelism Podcast aims to equip listeners to share their faith more effectively in a sceptical world. Each episode, our hosts chat to a guest who has a great story, a useful resource, or some other expertise that helps equip you to talk persuasively, winsomely, and engagingly with your friends, colleagues and neighbours about Jesus.

Spotlight on Defending Your Faith

5 Steps to Answering Tough Questions

“My pastor was totally dismissive. He looked at me and said ‘It’s really easy son. Choose the Bible or choose biology. Next question please’… I chose biology.”

This heart-wrenching story of a Canadian student who lost his faith struck Andy Bannister deeply. Disillusioned, the student thought the Church offered no real answers to his struggles. That’s why we must take objections seriously—and with Andy’s five-step approach, we can tackle even the toughest questions head-on

Philosopher Vince Vitale shares 4 ways of viewing the world that persuaded him that God exists. 

[Back to the page menu]

Key arguments for God: A Beginner’s Guide

What are the strongest arguments for God and why are they persuasive? The ‘Beginner’s Guide to Apologetics’ is here to help!

Read more about the cases from philosophy, science, history, mathematics and many more fields. 

[Back to the page menu]

How do we know if it’s true?

“If you look around there’s so many competing ideas: different religions, different worldviews, different truth claims. How do we actually test what is true?” 

Other resources

Does God Exist?

Philosopher William Lane Craig explains in detail a case for God’s existence. 

14 Arguments for God in 1 Minute

Andy gives a quick summary of the many key arguments for believing in God. 

[Back to the page menu]

[Back to the page menu]

Will you help produce more resources to help Christians defend their faith?

Will you stand with Solas as we seek to help empower Christians to be able share the good news of Jesus persuasively?  We speak at evangelistic events, as well as helping to train Christians to share their faith more effectively.

 [Back to the page menu]

Confident Christianity in Bury

We were on the road again recently, Andy Bannister drove Northwards, and I went South and our paths met at Radcliffe Road Baptist Church in Bury, just north of Manchester. On the Friday night we got to the know the pastor Russell Phillips, and many of the other leaders of the church and ministries within it, over a feast of traditional Lancashire pies! They are a church with a deep commitment to sharing the gospel of Jesus with their town, which is largely unchurched and very multi-cultural. It was wonderful to hear of their ministries and stories.

On the Saturday, Andy and I had the privilege of leading a half-day Confident Christianity conference. Lots of folk form Radcliffe Road itself came, along with guests from ten other churches from around Lancashire, that we are aware of. As well as delivering the conference – it was really encouraging for us to make loads of new friends – and to hear the testimonies of some folks who haven’t been Christians long; and who have come from all sorts of different backgrounds.

The conference itself was the usual mix of practical and encouraging tools for conversational evangelism, as well as some dives into what the Bible says about how we should go about the task of relating the gospel to different cultures. We thought about some approaches for engaging the apathetic, as well as how to handle difficult questions, The Q&A time was great too, Russell Phillips led us through the questions, and the quality of them were indictive of a fellowship which wasn’t doing evangelism-theory, but were wanting wisdom on real-life evangelistic opportunities.

It was good to hear subsequently that the church went away encouraged from the Confident Christianity event!

We do these sorts of events all over the country, and can tailor them to suit the needs of your church and context. Some large churches find a whole day-conference with up to four speakers works for them, other prefer a half day, or a few evenings. Again, we can adapt the conference content to meet the specific needs of your church. For example, some of Andy’s material on understanding Islam and reaching Muslims is the top priority of some city churches around the UK, but might not be so significant for some rural churches. Our goal is to serve, encourage and build-up the local church.

As well as imparting some practical tools and encouragement, the other way Confident Christianity conferences serve the life of the church is to help to keep evangelism on the church’s high priority list. With pastoral needs, buildings and admin to attend to and the challenges of running a fellowship, it’s all to easy for evangelism to be left for the quiet season, which never seems to arrive. One pastor said he likes Confident Christianity because it “keeps evangelism on the front-burner!”

So, if you’d like to help keep evangelism on the ‘front-burner’ in your church, we’d love to help. Please do get in touch, using the contact button at the top of this page. We’d love to hear from you and chat through the possibilities.

Message: “1 How to talk about Jesus without looking like an idiot” from Andy Bannister

 

Message: “3 Reaching the apathetic and disinterested” from Gavin Matthews

Message: “4 Five steps to answer any tough questions” from Andy Bannister

Message: “2 The Biblical basis for apologetics” from Gavin Matthews

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Does Artificial Intelligence (AI) Disprove God?

Does artificial intelligence (AI) represent the greatest triumph of science, proving once and for all that there is no more room for God in the universe? In this Short Answers video, Andy Bannister reflects on the recent developments in AI, suggesting that they’re actually more of a mirror—reflecting the need for a Creator when it comes to the source of our own intelligence. As well, they show us ever more clearly what makes us human, in the image of God: creativity, initiative and curiosity.

Share

Please share this video widely with friends or family and for more Short Answers videos, visit solas-cpc.org/shortanswers/, subscribe to our YouTube channel or visit us on Twitter, Instagram or Facebook.

Support

Short Answers is a viewer-supported video series: if you enjoy them, please help us continue to make them by donating to Solas. Visit our Donate page and choose a free book as a thank-you gift!

Lab Notes From the Faithful: Prof. Dustin Van Hofwegen

Steve: Prof. Dustin Van Hofwegen, thanks so much for agreeing to chat to me about science and faith.

Dustin: Glad to be here.

Steve: Let’s jump right in. Tell me a little bit about yourself. What it is you studied, and what is the work that you’re involved in currently?

Dustin: Sure. Currently, I teach molecular biology and microbiology to undergraduates at a University in Minnesota, the University of Northwestern –  St Paul.

I teach in the Department of biology and biochemistry, and I mainly teach students that are interested in health science professions, like: nursing, PA, medical school, and related areas. Prior to this, I worked as a scientist for several years, for probably 10 years. I worked in the US government and the National Institutes of Health, where I did basic research on pathogens, specifically, the molecular biology of pathogens and infectious diseases.

Steve: So, did you spend a lot of time in the lab yourself working with pathogens?

Dustin: Yeah, I was doing the bench work. My specialty was the plague organism. So I did experiments with the plague organism and trying to figure out how it behaved and how it was transmitted. Also looking at questions of how we treat it? And how is disease caused? Those types of things.

Steve: That’s really fascinating stuff. I loved my time doing lab work, but it can be back-breaking after a while! So, you have your PhD., tell us a bit more about that.

Dustin: I finished my PhD at the University of Idaho, where I also did microbial genetics and a kind of spin on evolutionary biology along with that. I looked at how organisms change to adapt to their environment. Are they changing through an evolutionary process, or is this a pre-defined, engineered adaptation process? Doing experiments that tried to answer those questions.

Steve: I’m always interested to hear how people end up where they do. What led you to that? What was it about the sciences that attracted you to? I mean, did you always know that you wanted to go into the sciences?

Dustin: I did, yeah, ever since even junior high. I think I knew I wanted to do something in the sciences, I was always drawn to that. I was the kid that liked to investigate nature, look under the microscopes, do chemistry experiments and blow things up! I was fascinated with the natural world, with how, how the details of the natural world work.

Steve: I can definitely empathise with that. I think we’re cut from the same cloth.  Okay, so you’re real scientist, I don’t think anyone can disagree with that. But, you are also a Bible-believing Christian.

Dustin: I am.

Steve: Tell me a bit about that.

Dustin: I was raised in a Christian home. My dad was a deacon in the church. Both of my grandfathers were elders in the church. So I grew up in a Bible teaching family. At family dinners we prayed and talked about Scripture church every Sunday. So I grew up in a very Christian household.

Steve: Often there’s an idea that if you’re brought up in a Christian family, they would be against going into the sciences. How was it for you, did your family encourage you to ask questions and to pursue the sciences?

Dustin: There was definitely an openness and encouragement from my family, although some people in my church weren’t very encouraging, sadly. My dad was actually the one that got me interested in genetics when I was in high school. Around the time the Human Genome Project was going on my dad brought home a Time Magazine one time, and it said the secret of life decoded. And I just remember reading about all the insights that we could gain from looking at the human genome, and what implications that shed on our uniqueness as humans. Already then I knew that there was going to be an explosion in the field of genetics, and I just wanted to be a part of that.

Steve: Let me press in a bit based on what you just said about the church experience being a bit different from your family experience. I’m sure you’re aware of the idea that there is science, and science is how we get to know about the world. It’s how we get to know any kind of facts about things. And then there’s faith. There’s religion. And that’s just blind faith. And according to some, it’s against the evidence, so how can someone be a Christian and a scientist?

Have you experienced that kind of attitude? In what ways?

Dustin: Yeah, I’ve experienced that from a lot of people in the in the church that don’t really have scientific training and haven’t spent much time thinking about it. So what I’ve experienced is that science is asking different questions of the world around us than theologians do. Science is merely just a process by which we ask questions of nature, and how we understand how the world around us operates. And then scripture, you know, that’s God’s special revelation to us, and that gives us truths about the world from God’s perspective. So for me as a Christian who’s also trained as a scientist, I see obvious parallels between how we approach the world. If God made the world, we should be able to investigate its secrets from a scientific perspective, from using the methodology of science to investigate it.

So I go about understanding the natural world as God’s general revelation, which he gives to everybody. Everybody can see the works of the Lord, as we read in Romans 1 where it says that God can be perceived from what has been made. All can see the glory of God in nature. And then there’s special revelation, how God’s speaks more specifically through the Biblical text – I believe the two work together.

Steve: It sounds like you’re saying that from Romans 1, that it’s almost like the Bible is kind of pushing us to say “Hey, go and have a look at the natural world”. That doesn’t seem very anti-science to me.

Dustin: I completely agree with that. I think we also get that in the creation story in Genesis as well. When God tells Adam to have dominion over the world it means go figure this thing out. Go put it in in place. Go be a steward of this world.

Steve: Would you say then, that your Christian belief – based on the Bible – in a way, compels you to your science.

Dustin: Exactly. Yeah, I find them completely compatible.

Steve: I know some people, definitely many of our atheists friends would very much disagree with that. Very often you hear stories of people in the sciences coming up against some antagonism when they find out that you’re a Christian. Is that something you’ve experienced in any in any way over the years?

Dustin: Oh, certainly! Especially in my field of biology.

You run up against that all the time as it’s the biological sciences that seem to have the most vitriolic response to any kind of religion. It’s this warfare hypothesis that a lot of atheists or agnostics would have about the relationship between science and faith. I don’t subscribe to that, but many biologists do so. I see my science and faith as overlapping. They’re integrated.

Whereas the warfare thesis says that they’re at odds with each other, or even  non-overlapping magisterial – the view of Stephen Gould, which is that they’re mutually separated from each other. I don’t subscribe to that one. I think that we can learn so much about the world around us from the perspective of this all being God’s handiwork. Now, go organize it. Go piece it together.

Steve: Thinking about that warfare idea and the antagonism that can go with it sometimes; in what ways do you think that that has impacted young people, especially young Christians, in terms of considering going into the sciences. Do you think it’s had an effect?

Dustin: I think it certainly has. Like I mentioned before, there was not necessarily hostility, but there was a recommendation to not go into the sciences from people in my church, who were probably thinking in that same way. They maybe had the idea that the sciences are filled with atheist and you’re going to become an atheist too if you pursue that.

I think they were primarily well-meaning people, but they accepted too much of that warfare thesis. And so I think because of attitudes like that there are very few Christians in the natural sciences, this recommendation for decades from well-meaning Christians. It really saddens me, because  there just aren’t enough Christians in the sciences who can communicate that there isn’t a war between Biblical faith and science, or they’re not in major positions to express that perspective, anyway.

Steve: That’s really helpful, and I think we’ve covered some really good ground. Two more questions.

The first: you teach a good number of students who hold a different worldview perspective to you, who maybe don’t share your Christian faith. When they see that you are a Christian and also that you’re also very accomplished and credentialed scientist, do you ever get any questions about that? And, how do you respond?

Dustin: Oh, yeah. The question is always “wait, you can be a scientist and a Christian?”

Yeah, that’s always the question. Sometimes if I’m at a conference and go talk to another scientist to and share what I’m working on right now, and they also know I’m a Christian, they just look at me, puzzled. Then the question comes, “how can you be a Christian and scientist? I thought they didn’t agree with each other?”

So that perception is still very much alive and well, and especially in the academy, especially with scientists. But I think we’re moving away from that slowly. I think there is increasing evidence that suggests that there is evidence for a creator in the world around us.

When I teach the students of science that are coming into my classroom and coming in to work in my lab, I’m always trying to give them the different perspectives, one being that I believe we can see God’s handiwork in the things that have been made. We can unpack this. We can see it. We can reveal it. We don’t have to shy away from that as an explanation – it’s often the best explanation of what we see.

Steve: Last question. If you had a young person sitting in front of you who might be wrestling with whether to go into the sciences – maybe they’ve heard of this idea of warfare between faith and science, what would you say to them? How would you encouraging them into to the sciences generally, but also particularly within the field that you work in?

Dustin: Sure. I would say God likes us to be very good at our jobs. God created us to do something, each of us with a unique role in this world, and part of that is the investigation of nature, where we are revealing His handiwork.

And so a young person that’s in my classroom, especially if they’re a Christian, that’s wrestling with this call to potentially be a scientist, I encourage them to be the best scientist that you can and also maintain a very strong prayer life God.

God reveals insights to us as we go about our work, and the sciences are no different. We’re not going to get conclusions from that, but I think the insights that we can get from a daily prayer life and a walk with the Lord tells us that He speaks to us and he might give us some hints on where he wants us to pursue.

Steve: That’s really encouraging. I’m sure there’s so much more that we could say. But thank you so much for agreeing to chat to me about science and faith today. I hope we get the time to chat again soon,

Dustin: My pleasure.

God is Love – Exploring 1 John 4

1 John 4: 7-21 is the part of the Bible that says, “God is Love”, one of the most well-known and loved phrases in the whole of the scriptures. But what does ‘God is Love’ really mean? How has that phrase been misunderstood? More importantly, how can we know God’s love and know that we are secure within it?

I had the privilege of exploring all these questions with Perth Baptist Church recently and delving into the treasures found in this great text. They recorded the talk and it can be seen here. The clip is set to play from the scripture reading and the Bible teaching begins at 34:53.

PEP Talk with Christians in Sport

There was a time when a famous sports star giving their testimony was considered the pinnacle of evangelism. These days, there’s a richer and more accessible relationship between sport and sharing the gospel. We have two guests from Christians in Sport on the podcast today, exploring the opportunities sport has for us, either as participants or observers.

With Jonny Reid and Graham Daniels PEP Talk

Our Guests

Dr Graham Daniels is a former professional footballer, now the General Director of Christians in Sport and a director of Cambridge United Football Club. He also holds positions at St Andrew the Great Church and Ridley Hall Theological College in Cambridge. He is married to Michelle and has three children and five grandchildren.

Jonny Reid is the Director of Engagement at Oak Hill College and writes regularly for Christians in Sport. He plays cricket at Cumnor Cricket Club and is one of the leaders of Town Church Bicester.

About PEP Talk

The Persuasive Evangelism Podcast aims to equip listeners to share their faith more effectively in a sceptical world. Each episode, our hosts chat to a guest who has a great story, a useful resource, or some other expertise that helps equip you to talk persuasively, winsomely, and engagingly with your friends, colleagues and neighbours about Jesus.

Should We Be Activists?

Everyone is passionate about something, and for many it is a cause like justice, peace, or addressing poverty in our world. But why should we be activists – why do we think the world ought to be changed in some way or another? If we live in a godless universe, it’s difficult to see why things ought to be any different than they are. But if we start with the God of the Bible, we find a fantastic vision of how the world should be – and an amazing ally in Christ who sets out to accomplish it.

Share

Please share this video widely with friends or family and for more Short Answers videos, visit solas-cpc.org/shortanswers/, subscribe to our YouTube channel or visit us on Twitter, Instagram or Facebook.

Support

Short Answers is a viewer-supported video series: if you enjoy them, please help us continue to make them by donating to Solas. Visit our Donate page and choose a free book as a thank-you gift!

Science & God: Friend or Foe?

Are science and God really at war?

A superficial reading of the history of science has left many with the idea that science and belief in God are mutually exclusive and incompatible. This is an idea which – although long discredited – is still presented by many who, for various reasons, wish to relegate belief in God to the corridors of ancient myth. Science, we are told, has squeezed God out of the gaps in our knowledge that He was once there to fill. In short – we know better now, and any real scientist would acknowledge this and abandon such silly antiquated superstitions as belief in God. Where there is any perceived conflict, the outcome will be – must be – that science will be the victor even if only in the distant future, they say. This view has come to be known as the ‘warfare’ or ‘conflict’ thesis.

How did we get here?

That assumption that science and faith were natural enemies hasn’t always dominated, however. When the great natural philosophers of old (what scientists were called back before the word ‘scientist’ was a thing) embarked on their investigations of the world, they did so very much because of their belief in God. They believed that the world was made by an intelligent creator who had endowed it with intelligibility – that is, because they believed in an Orderer, they assumed that there was order to be found in nature, which their job was to explore.

No way! That’s just nonsense made up by Christians!” some people object. Don’t take my word for it; here are the words of just one of the great scientific pioneers, Johannes Kepler, the German astronomer and mathematician:

“It is a right, yes a duty, to search in cautious manner for the numbers, sizes, and weights, the norms for everything He [God] has created. For He himself has let man take part in the knowledge of these things … For these secrets are not of the kind whose research should be forbidden; rather they are set before our eyes like a mirror so that by examining them we observe to some extent the goodness and wisdom of the Creator.”[i]

And again Kepler says,

“The chief aim of all investigations of the external world should be to discover the rational order and harmony which has been imposed on it by God and which He revealed to us in the language of mathematics.”[ii]

Or again,

“I wanted to become a theologian; for a long time I was unhappy. Now, behold, God is praised by my work even in astronomy.”[iii]

Hypothetically, even if Kepler’s belief was false, what one cannot say is that he thought  his belief in God and his scientific endeavours were at odds with each other or that belief in God would inhibit doing good science. He, like the majority of the pioneers of modern science, believed that God and science were not enemies on the battlefield, but were actually good friends sharing a pint down at the pub…proverbially speaking.

So then, how did we get here? How did this warfare or ‘conflict thesis’ become such a norm, especially in the media, the public imagination, and the black hole of Instagram comment sections.

Writing in the 19th century, two of the most well-known authors who popularised the ‘conflict thesis’ were John William Draper[iv] and Andrew Dickson White[v]. Their writings became popular and widely circulated at a time in history where it seemed that science was the ultimate panacea – the cure to all the ills of our human condition. Microscope and Bunsen burner in hand, Science the Saviour had come to our rescue. That was the perception, anyway.

Both Draper and White, it turns out, had their own personal issues with organised religion and White’s critique was directed more toward overly dogmatic theology than it was to religion and the idea of God in general, and their conclusions were not the result of any empirical science but rather a poor reading of the history of science. However,  those facts are generally overlooked by those who want to keep the ‘conflict thesis’ afloat. As the sciences enjoyed success in the following years, the warfare idea grew in popularity too. This was not the result of more scientific observation, but as an attractive polemic for those who rejected religion but needed a weapon.

A few Issues

The problem is that the ‘conflict thesis’ has been widely rejected as a completely inadequate framework within which to construct a sensitive and realistic historiography of science in the West. Historian of science Ronald Numbers regards the idea of science and faith being in perpetual conflict as “historically bankrupt”[vi], and has written extensively to correct this stereotypical and inaccurate view.[vii] Here are just three issues with the ‘conflict thesis’: first, it unnecessarily hinders the recognition of other relationships between science and religion – especially where they have been mutually encouraging and symbiotic. As previously mentioned, key figures of modern science like Johannes Kepler,  Robert Boyle, Isaac Newton and Rene Descartes acknowledged that Christianity played a significant role in shaping their scientific endeavours. Second, the warfare thesis simply ignores instances of science and religion working together – especially in the establishment of societies and academic institutions committed to the integration of science and religion. Third, it seems to strip minor squabbles from their historical context, distort, and enthrone them as shining examples of religion oppressing scientific progress – with the result of only obscuring both the ideas of science and religion. One clear, and still widely-flung example is the case of Galileo Galilei (1564-1642). The popularised version perpetuated by proponents of the ‘warfare thesis’ reads more like a low-budget Channel 5 playground drama than the complex clerico-political saga of Galileo’s day. The shortcomings of the conflict thesis have been elucidated repeatedly in the past few decades by scholars on opposite ends of the spectrum, and yet it still lingers on – primarily due to lack of study and perhaps, sadly, because it still serves as a good piece of anti-religious propaganda, despite it having been convincingly debunked.

There is so much more that could be written – and indeed so much more has been written. A good place to start, if you’re looking to dig a little deeper, is a great book titled Of Popes & Unicorns by Hutchings and Ungureanu (2021). Our friend Mark McCartney was kind enough to write a short review ‘here’.

Instead of unpacking the debate further, we at Solas thought a demonstration may prove more useful. To that end, over the next few months we will be interviewing several scientists from diverse cultural and scientific backgrounds about their professional work and their Christian faith. We will be hearing from the proverbial horses mouths, how science and Christianity may inform and enrich one another.

The ‘conflict thesis’ may still have popular currency and be misleadingly assumed in some school textbooks, but it is time to tell a better, and more accurate story.


 

[i] Epitome of Copernican Astronomy. In Michael B. Foster, Mystery and Philosophy, 61.

[ii] Defundamentis Astrologiae Certioribus, Thesis XX (1601)

[iii] Letter to Michael Maestlin, 3 October 1595. KGW 13, 40.

[iv] History of the Conflict Between Religion and Science, 1874.

[v] A History of the Warfare of Science with Theology in Christendom, 1896.

[vi] Numbers, Ronald L. “Science and Religion.” Osiris 2d ser. (1985):58–80.[vii] Numbers et. al. God and Nature: Historical Essays on the Encounter between Christianity and Science (1986)

The Great Question of Suffering – Steve at RGU

One of the most difficult topics to address is suffering. It’s something we all experience at some point in life, probably many times, and in very different ways. It can be really hard to address in a short talk, and there are often people who come along to listen who are at that moment suffering – so it’s something you need to navigate very gently too.

But, it’s also one of the best topics to speak about as a way to get to sharing the Gospel! Jesus himself stepped in to this world and experienced great suffering, for us! So we can point people to him as our sympathetic High Priest, as the author of Hebrews puts it.

Recently the Christian Union at Robert Gordon University in Aberdeen invited me to speak at a lunch event of the topic ‘Why do we experience suffering?’. As I made my way to the venue I passed the CU team in a broad and busy corridor area where they were busy engaging with people to invite them to come along for a free lunch and to hear a talk on the issue of suffering. The place was buzzing with energy as new students were moving past all the tables where different groups and clubs had pop-up stalls showcasing their different activities.

That energy continued as the event began, and there was a good turnout with several visitors coming after receiving flyers, and several more came along with Christian friends who had invited them. After the talk there were some really good conversations all around the room, and I had the opportunity to spend some time speaking to two student who had arrived in Scotland from Nigeria just 3 weeks ago. They were really intrigued with the fact that Christians were doing events like this, and were keen to come along to future events to hear more.

Engaging on universities campuses can often feel daunting, but time after time I’m so encouraged by the openness that people have to hearing about the truth of Christianity. Let’s continue to pray that the seeds that are sown at events like this will be watered and flourish.

With Tom Elliott

Whilst street drama and puppet shows might be a dying form of outreach these days, today’s guest started there and continued on to become a professional comedian and magician. How has he achieved success in this field without compromising the gospel or his own values? And how might the church use arts and entertainment better in reaching the world today?

With Tom Elliott PEP Talk

Our Guest

Tom Elliott works as an Event Host & Comedy Magician, performing across the UK hosting corporate events, whilst also performing at holiday parks, churches, theatres and comedy clubs. Once described by Miranda Hart as ‘Such Fun’, Tom has appeared on BBC TV & Radio, had a feature piece in the Times Newspaper and received significant crowdfunding support for his arts-based initiatives. He also hosts a weekly show on Konnect Radio.

To book Tom at your church, or find out more, go to tom-elliot.org

About PEP Talk

The Persuasive Evangelism Podcast aims to equip listeners to share their faith more effectively in a sceptical world. Each episode, our hosts chat to a guest who has a great story, a useful resource, or some other expertise that helps equip you to talk persuasively, winsomely, and engagingly with your friends, colleagues and neighbours about Jesus.