Confident Christianity conference: Aberdeen

Solas has been on the road again with our Confident Christianity conferences, which are increasingly taking us all over the UK. This time, Andy Bannister and the team went northward, where Hebron Evangelical Church were our hosts in Aberdeen. The conference was a great collaboration between Hebron, Aberdeen Christian Fellowship, Gerrard Street Baptist, Gilcomston Church, and Deeside Christian Fellowship.
All Confident Christianity conferences have on thing in common; they are designed to excite and equip Christians in local churches for evangelism. That means both direct training in helpful ways to talk about Jesus in today’s world; but also some great ways in which to thoughtfully and respectfully engage with people’s objections and questions to Christian belief. Solas draws upon a range of expert speakers from across the UK and each conference features three or four of these speakers and no two Confident Christianity conferences are identical.
Aberdeen’s Confident Christianity conference kicked off with a short devotional message from Duncan Ryan from Hebron Evangelical. He welcomed delegates by reminding them that evangelism is primarily God’s role, and we enjoy the privilege of God inviting us to participate in His work of reaching people.
20190601_093215682_iOSAndy Bannister led the first session of the day which was a very practical look at wise (and biblical!) ways of handing the questions that our non-Christian friends and colleagues ask us about our faith. So many Christians tell us that they would love to be better at explaining their faith in Jesus to others, but are afraid to do so. Andy encouraged the folks in Aberdeen not to let fear of failure put them off evangelism, but to discover that fear isn’t anything to be afraid of! Andy also looked at the ways that Jesus in the gospels responded to the questions people asked him – some of which were pretty hostile. Jesus’ method, and approach is something we can all learn from, and something which is liberating and empowering: and it basically involves learning to ask really good questions.
20190601_090913900_iOSMark Stirling lead the second session of the day, entitled “Unmasking the hidden faith commitments of our sceptical friends”. In this talk, Mark drew on both his academic work, and his experience working in the NHS to show that secularists frequently try to exclude Christian views, by trying to position themselves as ‘neutral’, but Christians are trying to impose their belief-system or agenda. Mark demonstrated that behind such claims are beliefs which are every bit as much as exclusive as ours! He suggested that exposing these hidden agendas is a good way of showing that Christians too have valid contributions to make to conversations about values, and beliefs. Later in the day Mark talked about “How to disagree without being disagreeable”. In this insightful talk which explored contemporary culture, he examined why people find Christian beliefs so offensive today (or portray Christians as hateful or harmful), and how can respond. Drawing on his own personal experiences of sharing the gospel with many people, he talked about loving and relational ways of sharing hard truths with a sceptical world.
20190601_101505331_iOSOur third speaker, David Galloway, is a medical scientist who is convinced that universe we observe cannot be the result of blind chance alone. He is convinced that the physical evidence (as revealed by the tools of science) point powerfully to design and intention and that this in turn points us towards God. In his first talk, David explained some of his reasoning, and encouraged the folks in Aberdeen not to capitulate to the atheist claims that the claims of science nullify faith in God. Rather, he encouraged them to be confident in talking to friends, family and colleagues about the creator behind the creation. In his second talk, David explored the myths of “Scientism”, the idea that the scientific method is all that is required to understand, and explain the universe – and just as significantly teach us how we ought to act within it. Popular atheist assaults on theology and philosophy are grounded on the idea that science is the universal tool for explaining both what is and what ought to be; yet it actually fails adequately achieve either. (Our latest Short Answers video explored the same theme: “Has Science Explained Everything?” — check it out here).
20190601_104510121_iOSMax Baker-Hytch from the Oxford Centre for Christian Apologetics (OCCA), was our fourth speaker. His first topic was “What historians can tell us about Jesus”. From popular writing to internet bloggers and social media pundits, the world is full of people who decry the reliability of the gospels and the portrait of Christ that they contain. Max looked at the actual historical evidence, and showed that the New Testament documents are extraordinarily accurate about every fact which can be historically demonstrated, and were written far more soon after the events they depict than most popular critics suggest. A critic on Solas’s Facebook post recently claimed that Everyone knows that the gospels were written centuries after the events’. If only they had heard Max’s talk and realised just how weak a position that is! Later in his second talk, Max addressed the ‘Hiddenness of God’ and was able to take the folks in Aberdeen through some great material relating to Jesus, his uniqueness and the revelation of God.
20190601_093158221_iOSFinally, Andy Bannister wrapped up the formal sessions with a talk entitled, “Are We Matter or We Matter?” which examined the Christian claim that humanity is valuable and precious. While our atheist friends want to reduce humans to just atoms and particles and stuff, Andy showed the beauty of the uniquely biblical claim that humanity alone both bears the image of God, and is the main object of God’s redeeming love in Christ. As such, the claim that we are merely atoms and particles, is reductionist, tragic and rather bleak. The Christian gospel’s view of the dignity of humanity, and our worth to God is a profoundly hopeful apologetic in our increasingly cynical and hope-less world.
At the end of the conference, delegates had the opportunity to quiz the speakers in fascinating Q&A session which was chaired by Matthew Henderson, pastor of Gerrard Street Baptist Church. Questions were sent in by text and included everything from how Christians should respond to LGBTQI+ friends to the historical evidence for the resurrection of Jesus.
Mark Brown, Hebron Evangelical’s Community Worker said, “I think the talks were absolutely spot-on, and covered a wide spectrum of topics. What they had in common was to get us to be a bit more proactive and intentional about evangelism. The church needs to be engaging and build bridges from where we are to where our secular and atheistic friends are. I think the theme of ‘Confident Christianity’ is a really important one. It was also really encouraging to see Christians from across the churches in Aberdeen coming together to think about this. I hope that conference will have an overflow-effect so that this won’t be just a one-off fun event for a Saturday, but actually begins to change the way we engage with our colleagues in a day-to-day life.”

“We could not have put on an event like this without the help of Solas. Your team made everything very easy from start to finish. Significantly it felt like a partnership and collaboration between SOLAS and the local churches involved.” – Mark Brown, Hebron Evangelical Church, Aberdeen.

Our hope and prayer at Solas, is that with every Confident Christianity conference that we do, Christians in different parts of the country will be inspired to talk more naturally and persuasively about Jesus.
We could bring a Confident Christianity conference to your town or city. Please contact us to talk through how it works—it’s much easier than you think, and we’d love to help the churches in your town reach your community for Christ.

Andy Kind photo

PEP Talk Podcast With Andy Kind

Your hosts Andy Bannister and Kristi Mair are joined by Andy Kind for this, the second episode of the Persuasive Evangelism Podcast, recorded live at CreationFest 2019. Both Andys will be speaking this weekend at the Confident Christianity Conference in Salisbury. Mr Kind has a fantastic talk called Hidden in Plain Sight: Why Jesus is the best explanation of what you know about yourself. If you’re in the area, come along for the most comedy you’ll ever find in an evangelism conference!

With Andy Kind PEP Talk

Our Guest

Andy Kind is a preacher and stand-up comedian. As well as travelling the world telling jokes and talking about Jesus, he lives in Chesterfield and is on the staff of Redeemer King church. Find him @andykindcomedy or andykind.co.uk

PEP Talk Podcast – Pilot Episode With Jonny Somerville

Welcome to PEP Talk, the Persuasive Evangelism Podcast, where we bring you an interesting guest each episode to discuss how best to share your faith. From testimonies to techniques to resources, each guest brings real-world experience or expertise to get you inspired!

With Jonny Somerville PEP Talk

Our Guest

Jonny Somerville is a Dublin native who’s worked for more than ten years in Irish schools and churches across denominations. He’s passionate about faith development and the opportunity to supplement school curriculum that helps young people grapple with their faith. He currently leads the NUA Film Series for Alpha and Scripture Union Ireland. Find him on Twitter @jonnysomers

Book Review: Why? Looking at God, evil and personal suffering by Sharon Dirckx

It is all too easy to reduce suffering to an intellectual question, forgetting that the questioner is very often dealing with a deep personal hurt that is behind what they ask. An inspiring story about a baby with holoprosencephaly is the first of five personal stories that ensure this book is much more than an intellectual response to questions about suffering. A logical and clear approach looks at both questions of individual suffering, particularly around illness, and wider questions such as natural disasters. Dirckx’s scientific background comes across clearly, as does her experience of caring for her husband during illness.
I particularly liked the focus on our personal role (‘Am I responsible for anyone else’s suffering?’ is one chapter heading), and the constant pointers back to Jesus’ work on the cross (‘Can a broken story be fixed?’). Although accessible for non-Christians, I think this book will be of most help to Christians who struggle with their own questions about suffering.
Quotations draw heavily on others associated with the Oxford Centre for Christian Apologetics where Dirckx is based, which may seem a little narrow to some. There is also a chapter looking at whether religion itself causes suffering, which addresses this common question of today. It is for its contemporary relevance and clear thought that I would primarily recommend this book; it may not replace The Problem of Pain on most bookshelves, but complements CS Lewis and others with its insight into questions being asked by many.

You can purchase Why? from our book partner – 10ofThose.com


Laurence Crutchlow,

8290e1d4d29deb24e492e0e4e391010789b4c137is a London GP and Christian Medical Fellowship (CMF) Associate Head of Student Ministries. This review first appeared in the CMF Magazine, “Triple Helix“, and is republished here with their kind permission.

Powerpoint+

Powerpoint, billed as Scotland’s largest intercity youth event, has regular gatherings for secondary school age teenagers, in Edinburgh, Glasgow, and Aberdeen throughout the year. These meetings bring hundreds and and hundreds of youth people together for evenings of worship, fun, fellowship. teaching and a good night out together Powerpoint+ was a whole day event, held on Saturday 15th of June at Errol Airfield, halfway between Perth and Dundee, bringing together the Edinburgh, Glasgow and Aberdeen folks.

Andy Bannister from Solas kicked off the afternoon session with a youth-version of his evangelism training session, “How to talk about Jesus without sounding like an idiot”, which focuses on how to engage in friendly, useful conversations about faith with people who aren’t Christians.
The main hall (which may have had previous life as an aircraft hanger or vast cattle shed!), had a stage and worship area, an exhibition area stuffed full of stands, activities and shops; and massive inflatables too. Outside on the grass, were loads of sporting activities, cafe’s and coffee shops.
Andy Bannister noted,  “It was great to work together with SU Scotland, Powerpoint,  and  speak to hundreds and hundreds of eager young people who want to go deeper with God and learn how to share the good news of Jesus with their friends.”

Reasons for God

When I was young, I thought faith had to be blind. I thought you couldn’t give reasons for God. I thought belief was something you simply had or you didn’t. It wasn’t until University that I became a Christian, and that was partly because, for the first time in my life, friends of mine were able to show me that their faith was not blind – that they had strong reasons for believing in God.
Now, admittedly Christianity asks us to believe some extraordinary things:
• The entire universe was created by an invisible, immaterial being.
• That being then intricately designed the universe so that human life would be possible.
• Then that being came and lived among us as a human person, he died, three days later he literally, physically rose from the grave, and then for weeks afterwards he appeared to hundreds of people.
Christianity makes some BIG claims. But here’s a phrase I want you to remember:

“CRITICISM without ALTERNATIVE is EMPTY…”

If someone wants to say your faith is stupid, you should ask them what they believe instead. You should ask them if they have a better suggestion – a better alternative – for how to make sense of the world. And then you can put the alternatives side-by-side and see which beliefs make more sense.
So that’s what I’m going to do. I’m going to give you four reasons why I believe in God, and then I’m going to place these reasons side-by-side with the alternative beliefs so that we can judge what is most reasonable.
We can see these reasons for God by looking back, looking up, looking down, and looking in.

1. Looking Back

First, let’s look back, all the way back to the beginning of the universe.
A hundred years ago most scientists assumed that the universe had no beginning – that it had just always existed. But one of the most significant developments in science in the last 100 years is that the majority of scientists have now come to believe that the universe had a beginning. Scientists are now able to detect that the universe is actually expanding in size in all directions. The picture that results from this if we trace back the expansion is a universe that began with an utterly dense point, and then, like a firework, exploded into the universe at the Big Bang.
The Cambridge physicist Stephen Hawking says this:
‘All the evidence seems to indicate, that the universe has not existed forever, but that it had a beginning, about 15 billion years ago. This is probably the most remarkable discovery of modern cosmology. Yet it is now taken for granted…’[1]
The universe had a beginning.

With more time we could look at many more reasons for God. For instance, what is the more reasonable alternative, that God is the standard of what is good and evil or that there is no such thing as good and evil? 

As a Christian, I think that beginning is explained when I open my Bible and read ‘In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth’ (Genesis 1:1).
But if you don’t believe in God, what is your alternative? The alternative is to say that the universe just popped into existence from nothing, for no reason whatsoever! This is a very weird claim. Here’s one depiction of it that I saw recently:

‘ATHEISM: The belief there was once absolutely nothing. And nothing happened to the nothing until the nothing magically exploded (for no reason), creating everything and everywhere. Then a bunch of the exploded everything magically rearranged itself (for no reason whatsoever), into self-replicating bits which then turned into dinosaurs.’[2] 

That’s having a bit of fun. But it’s also making a reasonable point. Things don’t just pop into existence out of nothing and for no reason. If the universe began to exist, there must be an explanation for its existence.  And the best explanation on offer is that God created it.

2. Looking Up

For the second reason for God, let’s look UP. And what we find is that the universe is incredibly finely-tuned for life.
Imagine you take out a deck of cards and start playing poker with your best friend. And in the first twelve rounds, she gets twelve straight royal flushes. (If you’ve never played poker, that would be like winning the lottery twelve times in a row.) What should we think? That’s right, she’s cheating! Why? Because even if she’s a very honest woman, it’s so incredibly unlikely for someone to get twelve straight royal flushes just by chance that someone must be messing with the cards.
Over the last 35 years, the Fine-Tuning Argument has suggested that we should come to a similar conclusion with respect to God. The universe we live in could have taken many different forms, and scientists are in agreement – not just Christian scientists, but scientists in general – that there are dozens of features of the universe that needed to be precisely as they are for life to be possible…not just life on the planet Earth or life as we know it, but ANY form of life ANYWHERE in the universe.
To take just one example, the explosive force of the big bang had to be within 1 part in 10^60th of what it actually was. In other words, the percentage difference that you could have while still accommodating the possibility of life is a 0, followed by a decimal point, followed by 59 0s, followed by a 1. If the Big Bang had been even the slightest bit weaker, gravity would have made the universe collapse back in on itself almost immediately, far too quickly for any form of life to develop. If the Big Bang had been just the slightest bit stronger, particles would have dispersed into thin air. They would have dispersed so quickly and wound up so far from each other that all we could have got would have been cold, simple molecules, nothing like the sort of complex chemistry required for any embodied form of life.
That’s just ONE example, and there are dozens more.
How are we to explain this amazing ‘coincidence’? How are we to explain the royal flushes turning up hand after hand throughout the universe? We should come to the only rational conclusion:
The universe is not the result of randomness. Someone ordered the cards; someone designed the universe.
And this is just what the Bible claims:
‘For since the creation of the world God’s invisible qualities—his eternal power and divine nature—have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that people are without excuse’ (Romans 1:20).

3. Looking Down

We’ve looked back to the beginning of the universe; we’ve looked up at the design of the universe. Now let’s look down.
And what I want you to see is an empty tomb – a tomb that’s empty because Jesus miraculously rose from the dead.
Before I was a Christian I just assumed that there was no way there could be evidence for such a thing, but when I finally looked into it, I couldn’t believe how strong the evidence was.
Richard Swinburne, one of my colleagues at Oxford University, is widely considered the best British philosopher of religion of the last generation. In his book The Resurrection of the God Incarnate, he concludes that on the historical evidence you could even argue it is 97% probable that Jesus truly and miraculously rose from the dead. Why can Swinburne claim that, and have it published by Oxford University Press? [3]
For a NUMBER of reasons, but let me focus on just one of them. Here is a passage written by the Apostle Paul in the New Testament:

For what I received I passed on to you as of first importance: that Christ died for our sins according to the Scriptures, that he was buried, that he was raised on the third day according to the Scriptures, and that he appeared to Cephas, and then to the Twelve. After that, he appeared to more than five hundred of the brothers at the same time (most of whom are still living, though some have fallen asleep). Then he appeared to James, then to all the apostles, and last of all he appeared to me also…’ (1 Corinthians 15:3-8)

Experts have come to agree that this passage is the first known summary of Christian beliefs. Many scholars date the creed to within a couple of years of Jesus’ crucifixion, meaning that the beliefs contained within the creed must go back even further than this. Thus, almost immediately after Jesus’ execution, there were many people who were utterly convinced that they had spent time with Jesus after his death. And even the threat of torture and murder could not make them change their minds.
Pliny the Younger was a Roman governor in the first century who was persecuting Christians, and he wrote this:
‘I ask them if they are Christians, and if they admit it, I repeat the question a second and a third time, with a warning of the punishment awaiting them. If they persist, I order them to be led away for execution.’[4] 
Those who walked this earth with Jesus went from mourning that their leader had been defeated and being too scared to even be present at his crucifixion, to accepting their own deaths by torture and execution rather than deny that Jesus is God. What can account for this? How could every one of them be so utterly convinced that this dead man on a cross – Jesus – was worth dying for? The Christian response is that there was a miraculous resurrection of Jesus Christ.
If someone doesn’t want to accept that explanation, what are the alternatives?
Could Jesus’ resurrection have developed as a legend over time?
No one takes this theory seriously anymore. Studies show that it takes about three generations for any significant legendary development to make its way into a text, but the passage from 1 Corinthians 15 shows that almost immediately after Jesus’ death his followers believed that he had risen from the dead and spent time with them.
Could it have been a hallucination?
No. Multiple people don’t see the same hallucination (let alone 500 people), and there were far too many appearances of Jesus in far too many places for this to be at all plausible.
Could it have been a big conspiracy, an elaborate lie?
Not a chance. People lie when they are getting something out of it. People don’t lie when they are being tortured and killed for it. The disciples saw something and it transformed their lives. What did they see? My answer is this: ‘God has provided confirmation for all by raising Jesus from the dead’ (Acts 17:11).
Have you had that moment, where faith becomes not blind but the amazing reality of what really happened?

4. Looking In

We’ve looked back to God’s creation of the universe; we’ve looked up at God’s design of the universe; we’ve looked down at the grave that Jesus rose from. Now let’s look IN.
A friend of mine once said to me, ‘Vince, do you think we can know God?’ And I said, ‘Yeah, sure.’But he wasn’t satisfied. He said, ‘NO, do you think we can really know God?’ What he was asking was, ‘Do you think we can know God personally? As a Father? As a friend? Do you think we can know not just about God, but God himself?’
There are many things in life that cannot be known from a distance. Some knowledge requires direct experience of the thing known. My wife Jo and I recently spent time in Florence, and we had the privilege of seeing Michelangelo’s famous statue of King David. We almost didn’t bother; it was pouring rain outside, there was a long queue, and we had already seen the statue countless time on postcards and documentaries.
But when we directly experienced the David—in person, up close—we were so grateful that we did. Only then did we know what all the fuss was about. We knew something by experiencing that piece of artwork firsthand that simply could not be known from a distance. I think this is also true of knowing God.
Let me tell you a story of someone I met recently who came to know God not just because of the evidence and the arguments, but because she realized that God was personally involved in the details of her life. She realized that God wanted her to give up her distance, and to live life together with him.
I was giving a talk at a University, and a Chinese girl showed up and introduced herself. One of my friends said, ‘You have an interesting name; what does it mean?’ And she said, ‘It means ‘by grace washed white as snow.’’
My friend’s eyes went wide, and he asked if she was a Christian. She said, ‘No, not at all.’ Then my friend said, ‘Do you realize that your name is basically the heart of the Christian message?’ And she had no idea. She had just chosen her English name because she liked the sound of it.
So my friend began to explain to her the Christian message – that Jesus loved her so much that he couldn’t bear to see her punished for the things she’s done wrong, and so on the cross where Jesus died, Jesus took our punishment for us, and as a result all of the bad things we’ve done are washed away; they are washed white as snow.
Then my talk started, and halfway through the talk I quoted a verse from the Bible, and I put it up on a PowerPoint slide. This was the verse:
‘Though your sins are like scarlet, they will be as white as snow’ (Isaiah 1:18).
My friend tapped the girl on the shoulder, who looked astonished, and he said, ‘I told you; that’s your name!’ At the end of the talk, my friend continued to explain to her the love that God has for her and the sacrifice that he made for her. And that night, for the first time, she decided she wanted to know God. She wanted to be in a real relationship with him. And she prayed to become a Christian.
There’s one more detail to the story that I find so amazing. My talk for that night was already written and printed a week in advance, and the PowerPoint was done. But at lunchtime of that same day I had this strong sense that something was missing from the talk, and so I rushed home after lunch and added just one additional page to the talk, and just one additional PowerPoint slide. What did that slide read?
Isaiah 1:18: ‘Though your sins are like scarlet, they will be as white as snow.’
God beautifully crafted all the details of that day so that he could reach into the heart of that one specific girl.
Do you know the God who is not just the cause and designer of the universe, but the God who will do whatever it takes to reach into your life? Do you know the God who knows absolutely everything about you, and loves you more than you could possibly imagine? Do you know the God who wants nothing more right now than to be in relationship with you?
The Christian promise is that you can really know God, in the deepest possible way – not just about God, but God Himself.

Notes

  1. www.hawking.org.uk/the-beginning-of-time.htm
  2. Widely quoted internet meme of unknown origin
  3. https://global.oup.com/academic/product/the-resurrection-of-god-incarnate-9780199257461?cc=gb&lang=en&
  4. Pliny writing to Trajan, http://faculty.georgetown.edu/jod/texts/pliny.html

This article has been adapted from a talk given at the Reboot Conference.


Vince-Vitale-webVince Vitale

Dr Vince Vitale was educated at Princeton University and the University of Oxford, and he taught philosophy of religion and served as a faculty member at both of these universities. During his undergraduate studies in philosophy at Princeton he took an unexpected journey from sceptic to evangelist. He then completed masters and PhD studies at Oxford, receiving a Daniel M. Sachs Graduating Scholarship and a Clarendon Scholarship.

 

Are Christians Intolerant? | Andy Bannister

“Are Christians intolerant?” In the latest SHORT/ANSWERS film, Andy Bannister explains why he thinks ‘tolerance’ is a useless word — and why Christianity has a lot to say about how we can truly relate well to those we profoundly disagree with.

Share SHORT ANSWERS on social media

Please share this video widely with friends or family and for more SHORT ANSWERS videos, visit solas-cpc.org/shortanswers/, subscribe to our YouTube channel or visit us on Twitter Instagram or Facebook.


Support us

SHORT ANSWERS is a viewer-supported video series: if you enjoy them, please help us continue to make them by donating to Solas. Visit our Donate page and choose “Digital Media Fund” under the Campaign/Appeal button.

Book: The Paradox of Happiness by René Breuel

41pdWYt-QlLRené Breuel’s little book, “The Paradox of Happiness” is a fascinating introduction to a hugely significant subject: human happiness. In a little over 80 short pages, he brings deeply incisive insights into the problem of unhappiness, and suggests a very distinct route out of it, into a genuine form of happiness. This is a pressing issue too, people everywhere are discussing happiness and wellbeing from politicians, to journalists and academics.  It’s a subject that comes up regularly at Solas too, when we take outreach events in coffee shops, pubs and restaurants. People are interested in happiness, and why it is both so alluring and yet sometimes so elusive.
Humans long to be happy Breuel observes, and he doesn’t suggest for one moment that that is a bad thing. Rather, he would agree with Jefferson et al who commended the ‘pursuit of happiness’. He does though suggest that the contemporary Western world has misunderstood what happiness really is, and mislead us about where it can be found.
Firstly Breuel takes aim at the way in which happiness is conceived today. His critique is two-fold, that we have both individualised it, and severed it from values. He writes, “we have reduced happiness to the individual realm – from the ideal for the collective life for the flourishing of humanity and loving social relationships, into a private self-serving pursuit.” (p13). Then, “we have also severed the ethical root of the notion of happiness. Instead of it being conceived as a result of virtue, happiness is now thought of as something smaller and trivial – as fragmentary moments of pleasure.” The problem then is that no one can live in a state of constant pleasure (however well marketed the means to pleasure are), and even if they could – it would not deliver genuine happiness.
Breuel then suggests that, while many people would instinctively agree with much of that, our usual responses are inadequate. He explores that way that people can become sceptics (cynically rejecting fake happiness), consumers (in flat-out pursuit of pleasure, products and experiences) or fantasists (my true happy-self will be realised when I achieve a desired goal). The problem with each of these is that they are driven by the same logic; they are all self-seeking, self-orientated approaches, which simply re-enforce the problem of misery, albeit in different ways. The problem, Breuel argues is that self-focus is actually the thing that destroys happiness, especially relationships with others, and also with God. “Our satisfactions are restricted by our incurved egos, our happiness is confined by our self-centred posture.” (p25) The classic example is the selfish person who feels threatened, or resentful of others successes, compared the selfless person who is genuinely glad when they see others thriving.
Finally, Breuel presents an alternative, rooted in the teaching of Jesus – especially what he calls Jesus’ most ignored instruction; that to gain life we must lose it, and we lose life if we hold onto it; and that we should in some way ‘carry the cross’ as He did. (Matthew 16:24-6). This is what he calls the “Paradox of Happiness”, this “truth dressed up as absurdity”, that “while happiness remains the goal, it can never be found”, because true happiness is actually the “by-product of a correct orientation to life”. The Bible, he notes, urges us to pursue goodness, not happiness – but it turns out that “goodness is deliciously happy!”.
The book ends with an invitation, not to a better technique for pursuing happiness, (let alone mere pleasure), but to a complete reorientation to life. That means not merely “stepping off the hedonic treadmill“, but actively dethroning the ‘self’, and orientating life towards God and others. Happiness, as an ‘indirect-good’, then seems to arrive by surprise. Breuel commends a form of self-denial, not as a repressed, life-denying form of misery; but as the discipline and cost of putting God and others first, the goodness which is so happy. This paradox, Breuel believes is deeply rooted in the structure of the universe itself, because it in turn was made by a God, who is both giving, generous, and profoundly happy. So, he ends the book focusing on Christ who is our example, is present with us, and in whom we live this kind of life.
This is a great little book, which is both helpful, and very countercultural. Yet it speaks directly to one of the great needs of our day. There seems to be something of an epidemic of misery in our society today, (and while some of this is no doubt due to illness), surely a great deal of it is also due to our deep misunderstanding of the nature of happiness and its location.
My only criticisms of the book relate to the things that Breuel left out, or couldn’t include in such a small book. These include some kind of comment about depressive illness, which can strike people who fully embrace the principles he espouses. Christians are not immune to illness, after all. Also, a little clarification about exactly what it means to live ‘in Christ’ might have been helpful, especially as the crippling misery of a guilty conscience is one of the things he saves us from. Finally, he could have talked about the transforming work of the Holy Spirit, that Christ gives to His people (the comforter, love, joy, peace) etc. but that might actually make a good follow-up book.
These mild negative comments aside, this is a really worthwhile read, it is culturally relevant and astute; and finally Jesus centred. It’s mere 80 pages can be easily absorbed in a couple of hours too.


41pdWYt-QlLThe Paradox of Happiness by Rene Breuel is available from bookshops and online.

A Parent’s Guide to the 5 Sceptics Who Want to Shame Your Kids for Being Christian

Having blogged for over six years now, I’ve received hundreds (and hundreds) of comments and emails from sceptics of Christianity. Once in a while, I receive one from a pleasant non-believer who is truly interested in discussing evidence, asking reasonable questions, and engaging in thoughtful discussion.
But that’s the exception.
Those who contact me typically wield the tool of shaming to make their point—something highly ironic given how much sceptics talk about the importance of evidence.
To be clear, none of the non-believers I personally know would use shaming tactics in person. But when people are behind their screens, it brings down the “barrier” of civility, and faith conversations often look very different. You can see it on social media (even with friends who wouldn’t say such things in person), comments on news articles, blog posts—everywhere.
Kids need to understand these emotion-laden shaming attempts they’ll encounter. Like so much else, this is something parents can and should prepare them for. Here are the five most common sceptics who want to shame your kids for being Christian.

1. The Science Thumper

Shame Tactic: Making the child believe they don’t have enough scientific expertise to understand that belief in God is unnecessary and silly.
The Science Thumper applies some notion of science to each and every conversation about Christianity, making it the final word on any given topic, and implying that science and Christianity are at irreconcilable odds.
For example, in response to one of my blog posts about the meaning of life in a theistic worldview, a sceptic commented:

You need to study the mechanisms of replication, mutation, natural selection if you want to understand why life exists and is the way it is. If life and existence are too amazing, astounding and astonishing to exist naturally…then how much more complex is god [sic] for having created it? … Did you invent superman as a panacea answer for everything you don’t understand?

Questions of faith and science are very important, but framing faith and science as a choice—one option for the unsophisticated and one for those in the know—is a cheap and false dichotomy.
Parent Solution: Thoroughly address faith and science topics so kids understand how shallow and unnuanced the Science Thumper’s claims are. See Talking with Your Kids about God for six chapters outlining the conversations parents need to have.

2. The Indoctrination Informer

Shame Tactic: Informing the child that the ONLY reason they believe in Jesus is that they’ve been “indoctrinated” by their parents.
Indoctrination is a word that both Christians and sceptics use wrong. Sceptics often think a kid has been indoctrinated any time they’ve been taught a given religion is true. Christians often think indoctrination means teaching kids Christian doctrine. These misunderstandings lead to conversations that unfortunately sound like this:
Sceptic to Christian parent: “You’re indoctrinating your kids [by raising them in a Christian home]! Let them think for themselves.”
Christian parent to sceptic: “You’re right! I’m teaching my kids Christian doctrine, and I’m proud of it!”
Both sceptics and Christians need to understand that indoctrination means teaching someone to fully accept the ideas, opinions, and beliefs of a particular group and to not consider other ideas, opinions, and beliefs. In other words, indoctrination is a problem with how you teach someone something. It is not inherently related to any particular belief system, though religion is one type of belief system where indoctrination is possible.
Parent Solution: Intentionally introduce your kids to sceptics’ challenges so they never feel the need to question whether you tried to shelter them from other beliefs. For more on the importance of this, see the post “If Your Kids are Someday Shocked by the Claims of Sceptics, You Didn’t Do Your Job.”

3. The Miracle Mocker

Shame Tactic: Making the child feel gullible for believing something that doesn’t happen according to natural laws.
Here’s a recent comment a sceptic left on my blog:

Just because some so-called holy book says something is true doesn’t make it true. Why do you believe outlandish claims about a god [sic] speaking things into existence, or about a man being swallowed by a fish for a few days and surviving, a worldwide flood [and ark] that fit all of the animals in it and eight people, or a story about a virgin getting pregnant? None of that makes sense, you don’t have any proof that it happened, but you still think it’s true. Why do you prefer to believe outlandish claims because they’re religious?

The logic here is what’s “outlandish” (no one believes all miraculous claims simply because they’re religious), but my point is not to critique the details of this particular comment. My point is to show how sceptics present miracles in a way that parades them as “obviously” absurd because (and by definition!), they don’t follow the course of nature.
Parent Solution: Teach kids the basic logic that if God exists, miracles are possible, and if God doesn’t exist, miracles are not possible (for more on this, see chapter 24 in Keeping Your Kids on God’s Side). This brings the question of miracles back to the underlying question of the evidence for God’s existence so kids understand that the person claiming miracles are silly is simply presupposing God doesn’t exist.

4. The Self-Sufficient Scoffer

Shame Tactic: Boasting that the sceptic doesn’t “need” God—and implying that anyone who does has an inferior need for an emotional crutch to get through life.
Oftentimes, when ex-Christians recount their deconversion story, they conclude with a glib comment of how they moved on because they no longer “needed” God. The subtly condescending implication, of course, is that those who believe in God do so because they don’t have the emotional resources to make it through life admitting that we live in a universe of pitiless indifference.
This is a strange conclusion that betrays a lack of deeper insight.
If God exists, we need Him. All things were created through and for Him; He is the Source and sustainer of everything by definition. Therefore, if God exists, it’s not a choice to need Him…it’s simply a fact that we do.
If God doesn’t exist, we don’t need Him. We cannot need Him. We cannot need something that doesn’t exist.
In other words, saying that you don’t need God anymore is a nonsensical conclusion. Of course you don’t need God if He doesn’t exist. And if He does exist, you can’t choose to not need Him.
What this kind of statement betrays, therefore, is that the sceptic originally believed in God based on felt needs (desires) rather than on the conviction that He truly exists. When they realised they didn’t need to believe in God to satisfy those felt needs, they simply eliminated Him from the picture and met those needs in other ways.
Parent Solution: Be mindful of helping kids build a faith based on the conviction of God’s existence and the truth of Christianity—not on felt needs for things like being happy, being a good person, or finding meaning in life. In other words, if anyone ever asks your child why they’re a Christian, you should want their response to be, “Because Christianity is true!” For more on escaping the felt need pattern, see the post “Do Your Kids Know Why They Need God?”

5. The Tolerance Enforcer

Shame Tactic: Making the child feel like they are unloving and hateful for taking a biblical stance that doesn’t approve of all choices as morally acceptable.
In a spectacular display of irony, the Tolerance Enforcer shames kids into believing that they must be horrible people for disagreeing with non-believers on the morality of various issues. By labelling kids hateful and unloving rather than thoughtfully discussing the evidence for the truth of the underlying worldviews that produce divergent moral conclusions, they rely on purely emotional attacks. Kids without an intellectual foundation for the Christian worldview are left feeling that they must be wrong about the truth of their faith.
Parent Solution: Help kids understand the irony of a person championing tolerance who won’t tolerate Christian beliefs without labelling disagreement hateful. Then demonstrate how Christians and non-Christians will necessarily disagree on moral issues because we have a different source of authority—the Bible. Here’s an example.
In all of these cases, remember that shame, by definition, is “a painful emotion caused by a strong sense of guilt, embarrassment, unworthiness or disgrace.” In other words, the root of shame is feeling inadequate.
In order for our kids to feel (more than) adequate when they encounter shaming attempts, they need to have the deep conviction that what they believe is really true. Only then will they be able to fully see these shame tactics for what they are—shallow and baseless emotional attacks—and be able to say confidently with the apostle Paul, “I am not ashamed of the gospel, because it is the power of God that brings salvation to everyone who believes” (Romans 1:16).


Natasha Crain

Natasha Crainis a speaker, author, and blogger who is passionate about equipping Christian parents to raise their kids with an understanding of how to make a case for and defend their faith in an increasingly secular world. She is the author of two apologetics books for parents: Keeping Your Kids on God’s Side and Talking with Your Kids about God. Her third book, Talking with Your Kids about Jesus, will be released in March 2020. She has an MBA from UCLA and a certificate in Christian apologetics from Biola University. A former marketing executive and adjunct professor, Natasha lives in Southern California with her husband and three children.
Reprinted with permission from www.natashacrain.com.

Why would a loving God send people to hell? | Andy Bannister

“How could a loving God send somebody to hell?” The latest SHORT/ANSWERS film tackles this common question—and in the process uncovers some surprising things about God, judgement, and love.

Share SHORT ANSWERS on social media

Please share this video widely with friends or family and for more SHORT ANSWERS videos, visit solas-cpc.org/shortanswers/, subscribe to our YouTube channel or visit us on Twitter Instagram or Facebook.


Support us

SHORT ANSWERS is a viewer-supported video series: if you enjoy them, please help us continue to make them by donating to Solas. Visit our Donate page and choose “Digital Media Fund” under the Campaign/Appeal button.

Lives Transformed at the "Top of the Town"

“The Top of the Town”

stirling-1237542_1920Stirling is a beautiful city to live and work in. “The Haven”, is a community hub run by Stirling Baptist Church, which is surrounded by historical buildings, the castle, and parks. The city’s beauty masks countless tragedies however, not least in the community in which we are based, known as “The top of the town”. The ingrained problems here include terrible rates of drug and alcohol addiction with all their associated problems, and it’s one of the very worst postcodes in the whole of Scotland for child alkoghol-2714488_1920poverty. Statistics show the scale of the problem, but don’t reveal the tragedy of what we see here. I could cross the road from The Haven, and show you a mother sharing her heroin needle with her 16 year old daughter, which is absolutely heartbreaking. From my window, I cannot only see the tourist sights, but also the addicts heading down to the local chemist to queue for their Methadone, and customers coming and going from the drug dealer’s house too.
Yet, it is right here in the middle of the ‘Top of the town’ community that we have seen God at work in the most wonderful ways this year. He’s been working through The Haven to bring people not just to faith in Christ, but has set about a complete transformation of the lives of several families.

“Ellen”

When I started at The Haven, I had no idea how to penetrate the tightly-knit, and suspicious drug-using community. But I sensed God prompting me to me speak to one particular lady who used to pass by my window, so I literally stepped out of the office and said, “Hi” and invited her for coffee. She was taking a cocktail of drugs and methadone, and was barely aware of me even being there.
Ellen recently said to me, “Were you not frightened of me, when we first met?” And I said, “No, I wasn’t frightened because God had told me I should be talking to you”. Actually she was moved to tears purely because I wasn’t afraid of her. Ellen was suspicious of me though, in fact she thought I was nuts! But I could see a glimmer of something there, and I kept working with her. Amazingly, eventually, she started engaging with me and other volunteers. And over months of talking to her, she became more and more comfortable with The Haven, we developed a relationship with her and invited her along to ALPHA, where she became a Christian, and she was baptised in May, Her life has been absolutely transformed. She loves the hymn, “Amazing Grace – I’ve been set free”, as it so perfectly describes her experience.
freedom-2053281_1920Because she has come off heroin, she looks great. Her inner transformation has been matched by a physical rejuvenation too. She looks so different that it has drawn a lot of attention. In fact, people shout to her in the street, “Hey Ellen, what has that drug dealer got you on now, you’re looking fantastic, doll!” And she shouts back, “I’m not on anything, I’ve got Jesus in my heart!”
Seeing Ellen transformed was amazing, but what I didn’t realise was the effect that this would have on several other people in the community.

“Katie”

Katie used to share a flat with Ellen when they were addicts, and had been on heroin for 14 years. She came to The Haven and we got to know her well. She came to us when she was trying to quit heroin, and sitting in my office I could see how her withdrawal had affected her. She was very seriously unwell, ‘rattling’, as her poor body was starved of the drug. I prayed with her, and phoned Teen Challenge’s Benaiah rehab centre who gave me some advice. Someone went and got her just enough heroin to keep her alive while she was waiting for a space in rehab. Wonderfully our prayers were answered, she survived, became a Christian, got into the Teen Challenge centre, and got off heroin. Teen Challenge are about to open an information and drop in centre in the Forth Valley soon, so hopefully there will be more help for people like Katie and Ellen.
Katie now wants everyone to know that she is a Christian. But you should have seen her when she first came here. She was covered in sores, wore a cap because her hair was falling out, and weighed 6-stone. But I could see that in there, there was an intelligent, articulate, inquisitive, beautiful young woman. Now God has transformed her into what she should always have been. Her letters are just amazing and she has real potential to be a future leader!
Katie wrote, “My favourite Bible verse is Ezekiel 36:25-27. It was the first Bible verse I really connected with and felt it was truly for me. It says, “I will sprinkle clean water on you and you will be clean. I will cleanse you from all impurities and from all your idols. I will give you a new heart and put a new spirit in you: I will remove from you, your heart of stone and give you a heart of flesh.”
Katie’s daughter who is a teenager, has been involved at The Haven for some time now too. She’s been to the Motiv8 camps at Scoughall a couple of times with us too. Scripture Union run these camps for children who are facing difficult circumstances at home. The first year she came, she was disengaged and angry, but this year amazingly she has become a Christian. Now several members of Katie’s wider family, are coming to The Haven and engaging with us and church too.

“Lee”

Katie used to shoot-up with a guy named Lee. But Lee was one of the first people I met who had become a Christian from the ‘Top of The Town’. His mother had a difficult upbringing and this caused her severe mental trauma. As a result of difficulties at home he made all the mistakes that you’d expect a young, broken, hurting man to make. God drew Lee to Stirling Baptist Church where he attended an Alpha course. However, after being brought low and hospitalised due to continued drug abuse, Rab Donald, the Community Pastor from the church visited him and Lee said “I want to change my life. I don’t want to do this anymore, I think I’m going to die”. And he literally was dying, his body was emaciated, and he looked horrendous. Rab referred him to a Christian rehab centre run by Teen Challenge.  It was there Lee gave his life to Christ in rehab and came back a changed man. He has helped so many people since then, including his Mum, who although deeply damaged as a survivor of some traumatic experiences – also has faith in Jesus. Lee’s story is going to be published soon.

The Haven

The Haven (2)Some people are afraid of the addicts and their challenging behaviour, the sores on their skin, vacant expressions and their dirty clothes. I just see somebody’s daughter, or somebody’s Mum, somebody’s child who is suffering and broken and hurting. Many people just break down when you show them any kind of compassion and love. They’ve forgotten what it is like to be loved because they have been rejected for so long. They say, “Why are you doing this?” “Why are you talking to me?” “Why are you nice to me?” “Why are you talking to my friends?” – they are initially really suspicious, but then they realise that we are giving and we are not expecting anything in return; we’re giving and giving and giving – and it’s Jesus that we are giving them.
On Sunday morning, at the end of church I looked around me and saw this little group of folks from the ‘Top of the Town’ that God has saved, and thought – “Wow- God is amazing!”

Looking Forward

My prayer is now that God would use these people who have become Christians in the community to reach many more people and that there would be a huge ‘bending of the knee’ to our Lord in the Top of the Town. We pray not only for protection for ourselves, but for the transformation of countless lives for Jesus too.


Mylene Herd

works for Stirling Baptist Church, at The Haven.32082586_100124740866132_7241361031954432000_n Follow these links to find out more about supporting their work. If you are in the Stirling area and want to know more about the life-changing message of Jesus, they are a good place to start! Some of the names in this story have been changed for confidentiality.
Stirling Baptist Church.
The Haven

Confident Christianity conference: Cowplain, Hampshire

CONFIDENT CHRISTIANITY – ON THE ROAD!

public_110_mob_9The Solas conferences in Dundee have been tremendously popular over the years, in response to demand from churches we’re now delivering them all over the UK.
Cowplain Evangelical Church were our first conference hosts.  Confident Christianity conferences are designed to equip Christians with the skills and confidence needed to share their faith with their friends, family and colleagues. They feature a variety of speakers, talking both about evangelism directly and about how to address the issues that come up in our discussions about faith.

ANDY: TALKING ABOUT JESUS

20190518_094220633_iOSConfident Christianity: Cowplain kicked off with Solas Director Dr. Andy Bannister on,  “How To Talk About Jesus Without Sounding Like An Idiot”, which outlined a sensitive, biblical and winsome way of speaking faithfully about Jesus to sceptical friends. At the heart of what Andy taught people was the power of asking really good questions—the very method that Jesus used in the gospels.
Andy from Cornerstone church in Portsmouth said that this session was the highlight of the day for him. “It’s been the most helpful thing that I’ll take away and try and chat with my friends and colleagues about” he said describing how he felt inspired to use questions to gently discuss faith questions with friends who are apathetic or disengaged. A delegate from Cowplain Church said: “It was a nice shift for me, because, if I’m trying to talk about Christ – I can go about it a different way getting closer to where people are, by asking good questions. So I found it really helpful.”

SEX AND SALVATION

20190518_100729335_iOSDr. Ben Thomas delivered two talks during the day on the hugely important subjects of human sexuality and the Christian faith. He began with a talk entitled “Sex and Salvation: A Story of Personal Transformation.” Ben explains: “I told the story of how I became a Christian which was linked to the fact that I identified as a gay man who was always contemplating, as I explored my sexuality, what if Christianity is actually true? I had started to read the scriptures while at University, and was attracted to who Jesus was, but yet never felt that God would love me or accept me because of my sexuality. And it was the story of really reconciling the two together which lead me away from leading a life as an active gay man and becoming a Christian and living in that way ever since.”
Ben’s second talk looked at the most helpful approaches we can take in sharing the gospel of Christ with friends and family members who identify as LGBTQI+. He emphasised the need to think through the biblical Christian view on sexuality before engaging in conversations, so we avoid being incoherent, or ill prepared. However, Ben emphasised: “We don’t need to be on the defensive because we have the best, the one-and-only gospel and Jesus is adequate for everybody’s needs. But it is about demonstrating that in a persuasive way that doesn’t at all make the LGBT+ person feel like they are being persecuted or a second-class citizen.”
One local Christian, Cindy, was tremendously impressed with Ben’s approach. She said: “My brother is gay, lives abroad, and we haven’t been in touch much over the last few years. But today’s conference has brought me much more understanding of his situation and inspired me to try and restore my relationship with him and share Christ.”

SCIENCE, FAITH and JESUS

20190518_111000952_iOSOur third speaker, David Hutchings, gave a cracking first talk on “God vs Science : A History”. It hugely impressed Tim Boxall from Portsmouth who said: “I was really interested in the origins of the science-versus-religion narrative (the mistaken idea that science and religion are at war), particularly its roots in the nineteenth writers who laid out a lot of the myths which are upheld today. I studied physics at university, and I thought it was really important to highlight that “science versus religion” is really a myth, they really are not incompatible.”
David Hutchings said afterwards: “Some people see the science/God friction as being a big enough stumbling block to prevent them coming to Jesus. So we want to try and explain to people that it is simply not true that you have to pick a side, God or Science. I’m a science teacher, and every single year I have students amazed to hear that I believe in God. They say: “But you’re a science teacher!” So the idea is ingrained very deeply in our society that it’s one or the other, and so Christians need to do something about pushing back on this.”
While David’s first talk emphasised the reasonableness of faith in general, his second talk focused on the unique claims of Jesus Christ in particular. He helped the audience see that all the various religions and beliefs in the world really just boil down to one of four basic worldviews: naturalistic materialism, secular humanism, pantheism and monotheism. David showed how monotheism by far the best-fit for the world we observe, which leads to the question which monotheism is true? David then showed how the evidence for Christianity and most especially for the character and identity of Jesus is overwhelming—and if Jesus’s unique claims are true, that means we’re able not just to know about God, but to know God, as he has revealed himself in space, time and history through Jesus.

JESUS AND THE FAILURES OF THE CHURCH

Dr. Andy Bannister’s last session, “Jesus and the Failures of the Church”, took an honest look at the times in history when Christians, or the Church, have badly betrayed Christ in its actions (such as in the Crusades, or its failure to stand up to the Third Reich). Yet in stark contrast to this chequered history, there have been times when Christians and the Church have been at the forefront of tremendous advances in civil rights, healthcare, human rights and justice. So how do we decide whether Christianity is good or bad? Andy argued that just as you can only judge the quality of a piece of music by comparing a performance to what the composer intended, so with the Church, we need to look to its “best performances”, those times when Christians have truly measured up to the standards of Jesus, especially his command to love even our enemies.
But if that was all that Christianity was, just a moral exhortation to follow the self-sacrifice of Jesus, we’d be stuck, as all human beings go wrong in numerous ways. But thankfully, the message of Jesus is much more profound that that: offering not just a new moral code, but a means to actually deal with our brokenness, selfishness and pride, that is the root of the problem in the first place. The gospel doesn’t deny or paper over human evil, but honestly addresses it—and in the gospel, offers the only solution to the evil that dwells in every human heart.
Caroline from Cowplain Evangelical church said: “Learning about history was a surprise, learning about the history of the church not being that bad was a complete surprise! You’re lead to believe that the church was always the ‘big baddie’ but actually the things that it contributed to the world are much better than I imagined.”

REACTIONS

20190518_144234987_iOSReactions to the Confident Christianity conference have been wonderfully positive.  Phill Brown, pastor of the host church, said: “I think people have found today so helpful because it was real, it was informative but also inspired people who are shy in talking about their faith to think ‘I can do this!’. The format was helpful too: short, 25 minute talks on a variety of subjects, evangelism, apologetics, testimony, was a really good way to approach it. People have been really positive and encouraged to be more confident.”
Andy from Portsmouth said “The conference was helpful for people with all different levels of understanding of Christianity, from the advanced to those who have never really heard of Jesus. My wife and I have signed up as supporters of Solas, because we think it I super-important that people hear about Jesus and Solas come across as having very loving and non-confrontational ways of speaking about him”.
Caroline said, “I found the whole day very helpful and very inspiring, it’s made me want to go away and really think about how I speak to people, not hold back so much but to be open with people, and to take the opportunities that I’m given. Christians need the support to be able to speak up, and that’s what Solas does. You give us that support!”

CONFIDENT CHRISTIANITY IN A TOWN NEAR YOU…

Forthcoming Confident Christianity conferences are booked for:
Salisbury: October 12th
Perth: October 26th
Dundee: March 21st 2020
Others are being planned after that and details will be published here as they are finalised.
If a Confident Christianity conference might help the churches in your town or city, please contact to Tim (office@solas-cpc-org) who would love to chat to you about how your church might host a conference.

IMG_8116 - Copy
Dave Hutchings, Andy Bannister, Ben Thomas

 

Book: A.S.K. (Real World Questions, Real Word Answers) by David Robertson

A.S.K. (Ask, Seek, Knock) is the latest book from the prolific pen of Solas founder David Robertson, his last publication before he left Scotland for Australia in the summer of 2019. The book’s subtitle “Real World Questions / Real Word Answers” explains more about its’ content. Every chapter of the book contains a real question about life and faith, from a teenager; followed by an answer, rooted in the Bible.
The fifty-two questions which shape the book cover an incredible range of topics. The first set of questions are around core Christian concepts such as who God is, The Bible, The Trinity and Jesus. Questions that young people asked around these areas included “I don’t get The Trinity – do we worship three gods?” and “Why do Christians believe that Jesus is the only Saviour?”
Then there are questions which focus on problems which young people are having in working out what their faith means. These include perennial questions such as whether animals go to heaven, and the question of suicide and salvation. Big world issues come next, one young person asking, “How would Jesus respond to North Korea?” Then there are ethical questions , like “Help! – my girlfriend is pregnant!” as well as questions about living as a Christian and not falling back into sin.
The questions that drive this book are clearly heartfelt ones, from young people wrestling with faith, doubt, ethics and some very difficult personal situations. The first thing to note and commend about A.S.K. is that these young people have been given the chance to ask these questions, and to engage with serious answers. I know someone who left the church as a child because they were told their questions were not welcome and that they should basically ‘shut up and just believe’. Thankfully those days are long gone, and the existence of this book perhaps nicely emphasises that point.
Each answer given to these questions begins with a quote from the Bible. I gave a copy of it to a seventeen year-old who said:

“The best thing about this was that it started each answer with a Bible verse, so you know where the guy is getting his ideas from. I never know where in the Bible to look for answers to these questions, and I liked the way that this book helps you with that.”

All of the answers which Robertson provides for the young people are short, punchy, biblical and engaging. As anyone who has read David’s work before will know, his answers are not ambiguous, or vague, but communicated precisely and clearly. Also, when he doesn’t know an answer (Such as “When will the world end?”) he’s not afraid to say so, but admit that some things just aren’t known. He’s also not afraid to frankly tell young people that sometimes the church has misled them and been unhelpful, such as with ‘prosperity gospel’ teachers.
Each answer is provided with a “Consider” section, which adds a useful devotional element to the book. So, for instance while the question of “God and Suffering” is examined (p63-5), the young people are then asked to consider, “How would you help someone who is suffering? What did Jesus do to save us from suffering? Do you trust God to bring good, even out of what appears evil to us?” Thought-provoking stuff. Further reading is then offered for each chapter, which would be very helpful for anyone who wanted to read more extensively on any of the given topics. The problem here is that many of the books suggested are probably pitched at too high an academic level for the majority of readers of this particular volume. That however is hardly the author’s fault, as I am not aware of many youth-resources on many of these subjects.
Each chapter then concludes with a prayer, inviting the young person to respond personally to the issues discussed in the chapter. Many of these are based on verses in the Psalms. Others are written specifically for today.
One seventeen year old in Scotland said:

“I like the feel of the book, it doesn’t feel cheap, and I like the cover too, I think that will help people my age to pick it up.”

The fourteen year old I gave it to was equally positive. She wrote,

“It’s very accessible for people of my age, it’s practical with a lot of helpful and useful information. It’s got a good selection of questions, including some I have asked or thought of before, but never had an answer to before. The layout is really clear, which helps too. I also liked the way it answers questions a non-Christian might ask you, giving you a clear and confident idea about what to say.”

I read the book in a couple of days and appreciated its direct, yet thought-through answers, although its 52-chapter format is obviously suited to reading a chapter a week for a year. This is a really useful book, nicely written and well presented. It deserves to be widely read.

You can purchase A.S.K. from our book partner – 10ofThose.com