When Andy was invited to talk about the Queen, and the gospel in a wonderful Korean restaurant in the business district of Frankfurt, he was eager to accept! Hear the full story in the video.

When Andy was invited to talk about the Queen, and the gospel in a wonderful Korean restaurant in the business district of Frankfurt, he was eager to accept! Hear the full story in the video.
In today’s culture, sexuality and gender are the embodiment of happiness, fulfilment and our sense of self. It’s no surprise that especially young people can find a God-centred view of sex to be oppressive, unfair or even hateful. No wonder Christians can find this area such a stumbling block to presenting the gospel. How can we help our friends and family discover a deeper and more satisfying view of Christ, His calling and our identity in Him?
https://feeds.zencastr.com/f/1h9kQLF-.rssAndrew Bunt is a writer and speaker who studied theology at Durham University and King’s College London. He is the Emerging Generations director at Living Out and the author of People Not Pronouns: Reflections on Transgender Experience (Grove Books, 2021) and Finding Your Best Identity: A Short Christian Introduction to Identity, Sexuality and Gender (IVP, 2022)
The Persuasive Evangelism Podcast aims to equip listeners to share their faith more effectively in a sceptical world. Each episode, Andy Bannister (Solas) and Kristi Mair (Oak Hill College) chat to a guest who has a great story, a useful resource, or some other expertise that helps equip you to talk persuasively, winsomely, and engagingly with your friends, colleagues and neighbours about Jesus.
For many years I’ve successfully kept one deep dark secret from most people who know me: I’m a life-long Trekkie!
Star Trek is one of the longest running science fiction shows of all time. Since its premier in the autumn of 1966, Star Trek “The Original Series” (which ran for just three years before ultimate cancellation) has gone on to spawn many sequels: “The Animated Series” (1973-1974), “The Next Generation” (1987-1994), “Deep Space Nine” (1993-1999), “Voyager” (1995-2001), “Enterprise” (2001-2005). In addition in that same period 10 feature films were released – not to mention the expanded universe of novels, comics, video games and fan films. Then after over a decade off television, Star Trek received a new lease of life on the big screen with the J.J. Abrams’ reboot “Star Trek” in 2009 (and its two sequels). The last five years has seen the revival of episodic Star Trek, thanks to new online streaming platforms, with the launch of “Discovery,” (2017-), “Picard,” (2020-2023), “Lower Decks” (2020-), “Strange New Worlds” (2022-), “Prodigy” (2022-) – and Paramount have announced several more series’ in production. If you were to sit down for a marathon watch of all things Trek then it would last more than 700 hours, or a month of non-stop viewing. As someone who struggled to watch a marathon of “The Lord of the Rings” extended editions, I don’t think I could stomach it!
Star Trek is the creation of writer and producer Gene Roddenberry. He sold it to the television networks of the 1960s as a western set in space: ‘a wagon train to the stars’. Thus the series began with these unforgettable words: “Space, the final frontier: these are the voyages of the Starship Enterprise. Her mission to explore strange new worlds, to seek out new life and new civilizations, to boldly go where no one has gone before”.
What explains the enduring appeal of Star Trek? Why does it continue to resonate with the hearts, minds and imaginations of millions of people, the whole world over?
I would suggest it’s because we secular people live in a disenchanted world. As C.S. Lewis reflected in “The Discarded Image,” we no longer look up into “the heavens” which display the glory of God (Psalm 19:1), but instead out into the dark, cold void of “space”. We no longer imagine the “music of the spheres” but instead listen to cosmic background radiation. Yet, in the words of Charles Taylor we who live in this secular age are “haunted by the ghosts of transcendence”. Our hearts are aching with the sense that there is something missing from our lives and longing for something more. We desperately hope that we are not all alone in the universe and that our lives are part of some bigger story.
Star Trek resonates with these longings in our hearts. But the problem is that its vision of that something more remains wholly on the horizontal secular plane. We’re not alone – because there are other evolved lifeforms on other planets (usually characterised by a funny looking prosthetic nose or forehead in the days before CGI). These aliens experience and wrestle with many of the same challenges as us on present-day planet earth, just out in the depths of space. Star Trek’s answer to those many problems is its vision of an enlightened peaceful secular utopia built upon the foundations of diplomacy, science and reason – a vision reflected in the counter-cultural (for 1960s Cold War American television) make-up of the bridge crew with different Races, Women (Uhura), Americans (Kirk), Russians (Chekov) and Aliens (Spock) all serving together (and to the dramatic script writers dismay, there was the Roddenberry rule of “no conflict” between them).
This leads many people to regard Star Trek as an atheistic show. For example, one of the longest running producers of the series, Brannon Braga, said at the International Atheists Conference in 2006: “[Star Trek] is a vision of a world where religion has been vanquished and reason drives our hearts to explore ourselves more deeply. It is a template for a world that every single one of us in this room longs for. And in that regard, it is an atheistic mythology”.
Often online you will find people attributing this quote to creator Gene Roddenberry: “For most people, religion is nothing more than a substitute for a malfunctioning brain”. However, it is not actually an accurate quote!
Although Roddenberry embraced his father’s indifference to institutional Christianity, and shunned his mother’s personal faith in Jesus Christ; he was more of an agnostic than an atheist. For example, when interviewed in the Humanist magazine back in March/April 1991 he voiced a dissatisfaction with a felt lack of evidence for Christian beliefs: “You need a certain amount of proof to accept anything, and that proof was not forthcoming to support those statements”. But he did not shut the door on the possibility that additional evidence could convince himself otherwise. Likewise in some of his last recorded interviews (published in “The Last Conversation”) Roddenberry confesses: “I believe in a kind of god. It’s just not other peoples’ god. I reject religion. I accept the notion of God”. Indeed, throughout his early scripts for Star Trek he is critical of those who misuse religious power and pretence in order to enslave and exploit people. But he continues to be open to explore spiritual themes and questions about our origins, meaning, morality and destiny.
Above all, Roddenberry was searching for answers about the human condition. That’s why his stories have often been described as “morality plays” rather than “sci-fi sagas”. Through the medium of Star Trek he was exploring the timeless issues of humanity’s relationship with itself (both our glorious potentials and our shameful evils), the universe and God – our creator. Perhaps most famously in “Star Trek: The Motion Picture”, where the long lost Voyager space probe returns to earth seeking to find and be united with its creator to ascend to the next stage of evolution.
All this leads Kevin Reece to reflect in “The Gospel According to Star Trek” about how the Bible offers a better story and better answers to the one suggested in Star Trek:
“Where Roddenberry saw human beings as a part of God, Christians see the fingerprints of God on his creation—a creation made in his image. Where Roddenberry concluded that God could not be a person, Christians see that he is a person unlike any other. Where Roddenberry saw humanity evolving and improving on its own, Christians see the plan and design of God for humankind coming to fruition. Where Roddenberry saw humanity as its own Savior—if indeed it needed saving at all—Christians see human beings as participants in their own salvation, partners with Christ, in the outworking of the grace of God… [Roddenberry] never saw the connection between the longings of his heart, the observations of his mind and the fulfilment they would find in Christ.”
The good news is that we don’t have to build the Starship Enterprise, break through the warp barrier to travel faster than light through the universe and beam down to alien planets in order to find the answers that we seek to our greatest questions and needs. Because the son of the living God, Jesus Christ has come down to the planet earth – not as an alien visitor or an actor in a prosthetic costume, but actually as a human being like you and me. That’s not just a science fiction fantasy, but a historical fact.
In Jesus we find the one who explains where we’ve come from, what is the purpose of life, how to live the good life, why there is so much wrong with the world, what God has done to begin putting it right, and how He has given us a hope that is greater than death. With Jesus in our lives we can “boldly go” where He has gone before to prepare a heavenly home for us, where we will truly “live long and prosper”.
Whether you’re a Trekkie or not; Jesus invites you to become a Christian – to find in Him the fulfilment to the longings of your heart and the answers you are searching for to life’s greatest questions.
Andy Bannister was the guest on this great edition of the Finding Something Real podcast – enjoy it on Spotify (above) or on other platforms like Apple, or Stitcher.
Have you ever wondered why music has the power to move us? Why it can stir our emotions, make us feel joy, or sorrow, or longing? If human beings are just lumbering biological machines, driven by nothing more than the desire of our selfish genes to survive and reproduce, there seems no place in that story for something like music. But maybe there’s a different story—and maybe our love of music is a clue.
Please share this video widely with friends or family and for more Short Answers videos, visit solas-cpc.org/shortanswers/, subscribe to our YouTube channel or visit us on Twitter Instagram or Facebook.
Short Answers is a viewer-supported video series: if you enjoy them, please help us continue to make them by donating to Solas. Visit our Donate page and choose “Digital Media Fund” under the Campaign/Appeal button.
Reaching new people can be a significant challenge for many churches. There are still a few people who will come in to a church service looking for answers; but there are countless more who would never consider coming to church. For those of us on the inside, a church service feels both safe and familiar and so it is perhaps hard for us to grasp just how deeply alien it is to people who have never been.
One of my friends went to an evangelism-training event in Yorkshire. The trainer took the whole class to a betting shop and asked them to go in and place a bet on the 3:15 at Doncaster. Afterwards he de-briefed with them about their experience. Different members of the group said things like:
“I felt really awkward going in”
“I didn’t really know the lingo, or the etiquette”
“I didn’t understand the instructions”
“Everyone else there knew what they were doing”
“Everyone stared at me”
“I felt stupid”
What they all said was: “It was so awkward, I spent the whole time trying to find a way to leave”.
The point is perhaps obvious – that’s how your average secular friend would feel if you dragged them into church. The point is not that the Holy Spirit can’t overcome these barriers, more that the job of the church is not to put barriers between the lost and Jesus – but to “go” out into all the world to call people to follow him. That’s what the Apostles did repeatedly throughout Acts, encountering people in the streets, in public spaces, lecture halls, debates, courtrooms, prisons, marketplaces and the temple courts.
So, how can we take the gospel outside the four walls of our churches and engage people with the life-giving message of Jesus today? One tried and tested method we are involved in at Solas is café style evangelism (hotels, restaurants, coffee-shops, pubs, community halls and curry houses also count!) Churches across the country are holding events in venues like these, often working with Solas to reach the lost. Their experience has been that there are people who would never come to church, but who are interested in Jesus – people who will come, listen and respond.
So, how do you go about holding an event for the unchurched for the first time?
The first thing is to identify a good venue.
An ideal venue for an evangelistic event out in the community is one which is well-known to local people, easily accessible and able to provide a pleasant, relaxed atmosphere for everyone. Obviously, budget is a consideration and a restaurant is going to cost more than a café.
In Blairgowrie in Perthshire the church men’s fellowship had met for curry nights in a local hotel for some time, so it seemed sensible to use the same venue for a guest event. In Kinross, Loch Leven Church went for a large independent café and shop. They describe it as a “well-known venue in Kinross-shire where people can sit and have a coffee in a relaxed, familiar environment”, further North another church we work with uses a local hotel – because it is popular for weddings and functions and has a good reputation locally. Highland International Church in Inverness found the perfect spot for their event in the recreation hall of the local hospital. Many of the hospital staff live on-site, and the church has a lot of members working in the NHS so it made it very easy for them to invite friends and colleagues. The point all the churches make is that finding a venue which is familiar to people and easy to access with good hospitality is the key. Both independent cafe’s and chains like Costa have been used successfully by churches.
Andy Bannister has spoken at countless community-evangelism events like this. As a visiting evangelist the best venues he’s spoken in have had good food and drink (hospitality really breaks the ice and it’s easy to invite friends for a meal, or for coffee and cake etc), a friendly atmosphere, and ideally been a venue that’s known locally — this way you’re inviting your friends into a space they already know.
The second step to do is to approach the venue.
This can be quite daunting when trying it for the first time, after all a lot of people are suspicious of anything to do with the church and Christians worry that they might get turned away! Experience though shows that in practice most venues are delighted to welcome any community group who is willing to pay for their services for an evening or afternoon. If a local group like a church brings people into their establishment, it guarantees them a profitable day because the community group are effectively drumming up trade for the venue. In Blairgowrie the owners of the hotel venue were keen to describe themselves as atheists but were more than happy to host the event.
Two churches we worked with in Scotland who used hotel function rooms for their outreach events stressed the importance of developing a good relationship with venue management by holding a couple of private functions there first and becoming known as good local customers, before asking for the opportunity to use the venue for an evangelistic event. Offering trade, and building trust opened the doors for evangelism to follow. At Highland International Church, they simply emailed the venue, explaining the event and received a positive response – it was that easy! In Kinross they thought that “Loch Leven’s Larder” would be ideal as a venue because it has a large outdoor seating area and they started doing events there at the tail-end of the Covid restrictions. “After speaking with the church leadership team about the idea, and praying together, I phoned the owner of Loch Leven’s Larder to ask if we could use the outside decking area section of the restaurant for a Christmas Carols event. She was happy to allow us to do this and kindly provided teas, coffees and traybakes to those who attended!” said Richard, their church leader.
(Oh, and don’t forget that the staff at the venue also get to hear the gospel! At one event Andy Bannister did for a church at a curry house, the restaurant owner and entire staff stood at the back and listened — and then Andy had a really long conversation about Jesus with the owner afterwards).
The third thing to do is decide on your aim!
This might seem obvious: the aim is to “preach the gospel”. Excellent, but it can be helpful to define your goals more precisely than that. Jesus spoke very differently to different audiences. He addressed the woman at the well in rather a different tone than he did the Pharisees for example. So, begin by identifying your intended audience. Broadly there are two main options here: evangelism and pre-evangelism. In evangelism your aim is to call people to trust in Christ for salvation there and then. That often pre-supposes that the audience have some knowledge of who he is and are ready for the call to commit themselves to him. In pre-evangelism the idea is to explain to people (who may never have heard much accurate information about Jesus before) why they should consider his claims at all. Pre-evangelism events can be especially helpful in launching evangelistic courses such as Christianity Explored, Alpha or Uncover Luke. At one event Solas helped a church run in a local hotel, they used the night to launch their new Alpha Course. We were thrilled that almost a dozen people signed up there and then!
Fourth, book a speaker and decide on a topic.
Many pastors or church elders love speaking at events like these; others prefer to bring in a visiting speaker who is more experienced in evangelism. It’s really important to find a speaker who is relaxed with and enjoys engaging with non-Christian audiences. At Solas, we love supplying speakers for these kind of events and travel all over the country facilitating them for churches. Work with your speaker on the topic and pick a subject relevant to your audience – and something the speaker is comfortable with too. Andy Bannister has recently used topics like “The Pursuit of Happiness” and “Plagues, Pandemics and Putin: Where is God in a hurting world?” and found significant interest from non-Christian audiences.
At Loch Leven’s Larder I used a recent news story to open up the topic of “Forgiveness” and why we all need it from each other and from God. One Baptist church we worked with on an event like this stressed that the speaker was only one part of the overall witness in their hotel-based event. Not only did they see offering good hospitality as important, but mentioned that the informal conversation around the meal tables was also significant, with church members informally sharing their Christian testimony with the guests they were seated with.
We almost always allow time for Q&A in our outreach events. There is something very powerful in being open and allowing guests to ask any question they like about the topic (or about Christianity in general). So we love to invite questions — whether from sceptics, doubters, or seekers. And remember: even if the questioner is apparently hostile, the fact they have come to your event and are asking a question is a positive step.
But again, handling Q&A with non-Christian people with grace, truth, winsomeness and wisdom is not everyone’s gifting or calling. So finding the right speaker for this is important. If we can’t supply someone for your event, we might be able to recommend someone who can, so please do get in touch. And remember, if you’d like help or resources on answering tough questions, check out the Short Answers video series on the Solas website.
Fifth – advertise the event.
All the churches I have spoken to advertised their events, but mentioned that almost all the guests who came from outside the church did so as the result of a personal invitation. Two churches we know had the bright idea of offering tickets in pairs, and only selling one to a Christian if they had a non-Christian coming with them. Wonderfully, using that model, both events sold out! One pastor in the Highlands of Scotland said to us that it is important to let people know that there will be an after-dinner speaker as you invite them, so that no one feels lured to the event under false pretences. However you do it, get the invitations out far and wide, because sometimes the most surprising people are willing to come, have a good meal, listen to a relevant talk and ask some questions. And of course, don’t do anything without a serious commitment to prayer.
Sixth, have a follow-up plan!
One pastor who regularly uses these ‘neutral venues’ wrote:
“Always have something to invite people on to afterwards, e.g. an Alpha course. In that way the speaker does not have to cover everything but to move people one step closer to Jesus and say enough to want them to explore the faith more.”
In other words, make sure that you don’t drop the ball but have some way of following up. Don’t ever get to the end of the evening and find yourself saying, “Thanks for coming, and I hope found that interesting. Goodnight”. Rather you want to conclude your evening by saying, “Thanks for coming tonight, I hope that you are interested in finding out more about Jesus. As you leave you’ll be handed an invitation to a short course we run at the coffee shop down the road on Monday evenings. We watch a short video together over coffee and cake and discuss life’s big questions together. We’d love you to join us, and we’re starting a new course this week” – or something similar. Critically, think through what to offer guests as they leave. Also, make sure that the speaker is fully briefed on what the follow-up is, so that he or she can lead towards it in their remarks.
Finally – thank the venue!
It may sound really obvious but thanking the staff and helping to tidy up can really help to further the ongoing relationship you develop with the venue which can lead to follow-up events. If you were considerate and gracious guests at a summer event, they are far more likely to welcome you back for a carol service. A thankyou card to the venue is always a nice touch, as is the practice of remembering to thank them publicly at the end of the evening.
So just do it!
Richard Gibb at Loch Leven Church wrote:
“Our experience has been really positive and I would very much encourage you to explore holding a community-based event – possibly in conjunction with one or other churches who have a similar vision to share the good news of Jesus Christ in your area. It’s an excellent means for people to hear the gospel message who might not normally go into a church building and feel relaxed in an environment where they have the option of leaving whenever they want to or can stay to hear more. Providing tea/ coffee/ food is always welcome, and helps to break down barriers enabling people to interact and feel relaxed. You might also be surprised at the willingness of local venue owners to hold an event of this kind – and is a good way to support a local venue by treating attendees to some refreshments as they arrive. Promoting the event in the local community in good time – through posters, social media and among other local churches – will also help to communicate information widely about the community-based event taking place.“
The “come to church and hear the gospel” method of mission certainly has its place – but it is far more effective in a largely Christian culture than in post-Christian secular Britain today. We are in a situation far more like the early church, who responded by taking the gospel out into their hostile culture. Café-style evangelism can be a very helpful way of doing that today. At Solas we have done a lot of these events over many years, have seen some wonderful conversions as well as one or two heroic failures. We’d love to work with you to help you run an event like this to reach your community.
Andy Bannister reports on an exciting week of schools work, getting young people to grapple with life’s biggest questions in RE classes – and the extrordinary explanatory power of Christianity.
Have you ever heard someone dismiss the Bible “because it’s just a fairy tale”? Or maybe that it was basically invented by the early Church to peddle their religious fiction? But if either of those were true, would the Bible be what it is today? Today’s guest on PEP Talk introduces us to the myriad reasons why the Bible would be impossible to invent.
https://feeds.zencastr.com/f/1h9kQLF-.rssMike D’Virgilio‘s latest book is Uninvented: Why The Bible Could Not Be Made Up, and The Evidence That Proves It. He has a B.S. in Communication from Arizona State University and an M.A. in Systematic Theology from Westminster Theological Seminary Philadelphia. He has worked in public relations, sales, and marketing for over three decades. His first book was an exploration of apologetics for parents called, The Persuasive Christian Parent: Building an Enduring Faith in You and Your Children. He also blogs on apologetics and a variety of topics at mikedvirgilio.com.
The Persuasive Evangelism Podcast aims to equip listeners to share their faith more effectively in a sceptical world. Each episode, Andy Bannister (Solas) and Kristi Mair (Oak Hill College) chat to a guest who has a great story, a useful resource, or some other expertise that helps equip you to talk persuasively, winsomely, and engagingly with your friends, colleagues and neighbours about Jesus.
Mark Greene was Executive Director of the London Institute for Contemporary Christianity for over 20 years, leading a movement that’s reached hundreds of thousands of Christians with the message of whole-life discipleship. He’s the author of over a dozen books including Thank God It’s Monday and Fruitfulness on the Frontline. Before joining LICC, he was Vice-Principal at the London School of Theology, and prior to that spent a decade in advertising in London and New York.
GJM: Thanks for joining us Mark. I suspect that a lot of people have come across you through your work with LICC, especially your ground-breaking book on workplace discipleship “Thank God It’s Monday” and follow-up publications like “Fruitfulness on the frontline” and “Transforming Work”. Why has this been such an important part of your life’s work? How did you become aware of this issue in the first place?
Mark Greene: Well, I became a Christian comparatively late in life. I was 23 and in my last month at university. My first job was in advertising and I was transferred to New York where I joined a small (by American standards!) Baptist church. It was what we now call a “Whole-life disciple-making church”, which back then was unbelievably rare. And still is. The population in New York is very mobile, so there was huge turnover of people in the congregation, folks arriving and moving away all the time. So their vision wasn’t to start lots of new ministries; but to do the very best for people who might only be there for a short period of time and to send them out, encouraged and stronger in The Lord, wherever they were going.
So, I was discipled by a ‘lay’ member of the Navigators, not on the staff but totally committed to their disciple-making vision. He was a lawyer and he taught me everything from how to read the Bible, to how to pray, to how to lead a Bible study or share my faith. In other words, the basics of the Christian life. Then my church noticed that I was doing ‘workplace ministry’ which I didn’t even know was a category! I was just doing what I thought I was supposed to do. But they asked me to teach an adult Sunday school series on workplace ministry and I learnt a huge amount from that. People came to that class from all kinds of workplaces, trades and professions and every week people would share what The Lord was doing through them. In fact, I quickly had to limit the sharing time because so much was going on! And I learnt that God can work through anybody in any place. After that class I got asked to speak about workplace ministry in various places around the city for different ministries and churches.
I then came back to England to study theology – not because I was called to pastoral ministry – but just because I wanted to study the Bible more deeply. And I realised that in the church here almost nobody was talking about work. It was actually deeply tragic because people were having their ministry withheld from them. And, perhaps even sadder, the opportunity to have a dynamic relationship with Jesus in their everyday life was closed down to them because of a diminished view of the richness of the call of God on all aspects of their lives.
Of course, it’s not just about work. The same principles apply if you find yourself at a bowls club, the supermarket or at the school gate. The question is, ‘are you walking with God in everything?’ because that is what He wants. One pastor’s wife summed it up like this, “Some people die without ever discovering the ministry that God had for them’. Sometimes people do great things but they just don’t get to enjoy them with Jesus, because of the misapprehension that he is not interested in those things! The Spirit of God is in His people – and good things still happen, but so often people miss out on the joy of realising God’s pleasure in it. And so I still have a sense of outrage and pain about what has been missed out on by so many.
So, in response I wrote “Thank God It’s Monday” and I have been amazed at how God has used to impact so many people. One of them, Nicola Marfleet is now governor of HMP Woodhill, and she wrote the foreword for the fifth edition. It’s not a complicated book, it’s a simple book containing lots of stories about how people have worked out how to live with Jesus in their workplaces. And the reason that it has had that impact is because most Christians have had very little teaching at all on work. d never heard a sermon on work. That means that there are huge numbers of people who have no idea why their work matters to God. Have they been given a credible way to witness in the workplace? Probably not. Do many Christians feel disempowered, guilty, or ashamed? Yes they do. This came home to me when we ran a programme called “Executive Toolbox” with executives from all spheres of work. They are usually members of good Bible-teaching churches, but they’d often lived with a sharp “sacred-secular divide” and had not been helped to see the connections between what they knew of the Bible and their daily work. Sales of Christian books about work are very, very low – which reflects the fact that it is still a low priority in the church. After all, people buy books to get better at things they think are important.
GJM: You raised the idea of a “sacred-secular divide”. Is that still a problem, and how we do address it?
Mark Greene: It is a problem – of startling intensity! In 2012 when we started mentoring young Christians who we anticipated would write, speak and advocate for discipleship in the workplace for their generation, we soon realised that none of them thought they were being fruitful for God. One had completely turned round two struggling schools – which was an incredible achievement which had positively impacted two communities. But these folks had only three criteria for assessing ‘fruitfulness’ which were: volunteering in the local church, direct social action, and evangelistic conversations. Now each of those three things are unreservedly good and to be commended and encouraged. But if that’s all we measure, then someone who has set up an NHS call centre to handle emergencies can think they have wasted their time if they haven’t had an evangelistic conversation that week! So we need to show people that there are all kinds of ways of being fruitful for God – without ever compromising the desire to share the gospel in conversation. When people see that God is already working through them in all kinds of ways, it builds their confidence. So, instead of only looking at those three criteria, if you also ask people, “Did you manage to model godly character at all last week?” They might say “I held onto my temper with that client” – or “I told the truth when it was not welcome”. Then what happened was that as people’s confidence in what God was already doing through them grew, it actually helped them in evangelism. They had testimonies other than how they became a Christian. This is all explored in the book, “Fruitfulness on the Frontline”.
But perhaps to answer your question more directly… I had a big shock when I was asked to speak at the Christian Medical Fellowship (CMF) conference, because I am not a medical ethicist. So, I asked them why they’d invited me and they replied, “Because most doctors don’t think that their work is significant to God.” Surely, you’d think that of all the people who wouldn’t need to be told that their work matters to God it’s doctors! And while if you asked them, “Does God care about your whole life?” they’d nod their heads and says “yes”; in their hearts they actually believed all the things in church life which communicate the opposite. These include who we pray for and why. Who is up at the front of church and who isn’t, where sermon illustrations and applications are drawn from and applied to, as well as which topics are addressed. So, a lot of churches run Marriage Preparation. That’s good, it shows that marriage matters, that God is interested in it, and that we want to help people to do it well. But which churches run a Work Preparation Course?
In 2003 I wrote an essay called “Imagine how we can reach the UK’. It argued that unless we can change the core culture of the church into a disciple-making culture, we won’t liberate all God’s people. This a bigger issue that just work. The underlying issue is “what is the gospel?” If the gospel is just about getting saved, then discipleship is at best narrow and at worst irrelevant. So when people were trained to share the gospel, they were trained just to share the plan of salvation (or the 4 spiritual laws) to help someone who wanted to become a Christian actually do that. But too often the critical issue of how to live everyday for Christ and with Christ, was strangely absent.
GJM: So you’ve been working in this field for over twenty years, how has the workplace changed in that time? And how has that affected being a Christian in that changing scenery?
Mark Greene: it’s an interesting question, because there are all sorts of things going on depending on which sector you work in, what age you are, how technology has affected your role and so on. But one major trend has been the way in which people have become more disconnected from the organisations they work for through ‘outsourcing’. Take the NHS as a significant example in which it used to be said that you could start as a porter and end up as a manager. However, if you don’t work for the NHS directly but for an outsourcing company, you don’t develop those connections and there is no way up. Likewise the gig-economy is a grim and anxiety-inducing phenomenon. And while (like zero-hours contracts) it can suit some people wanting a little extra income, it is not a comfortable place to be for many, many people seeking a stable income. At the bottom of the employment spectrum, the phrase “the precariat” (which has come to the fore in the last decade), describes an awful reality for a large number of people.
The dynamics of the workplace have also changed – in ways which have directly affected Christian witness. Until perhaps the 1980s it was common for staff to have a common lunch break which might even last an hour, but that largely disappeared a long time ago; along with the social interactions that went with it.
There have been some positives though. The workplace is much more egalitarian than it used to be. There’s still a gender pay-gap, a similar problem with race – issues of unconscious bias and so forth; but it is a great deal better than it was.
Post-modernism is still having an influence too, in that it allows people to choose their own truths and identities, which means that the whole idea of “be who you are” or “bring your whole self to work”, actually facilitates some things for us as Christians. So does ‘equality and diversity’ now that Christians are a minority. Some workplaces are now funding Christians to hold their meetings, as they qualify under the equality and diversity criteria. I recently spoke for a Christian group in a government department who paid for me to come, because the group qualified for diversity funding.
So some things are easier – it’s really not an even picture. Then reading almost all your Frontlines interviews, I was struck by how similar those people sound (in the way they are going about their work and witness) to the people I was writing about in the 90s and 00s. And again and again people are saying that relationships are the most important thing. You don’t go to work to preach sermons, but to work well, and develop relationships – because human nature hasn’t changed even when the circumstances in which people operate have. On the other hand, in your interview with the soldier, he observed that the younger recruits know a lot less about the Christian faith than his contemporaries do. And that is a pattern we are observing; that there is a generation who have not been turned off by the gospel, because they have never really heard it.
It was also often nastier in the workplace twenty years ago for Christians than it is today. Again I noticed that amongst your interviewees, how few of them said that they had been mistreated for being a Christian. People disagreed with them, some got angry with God, but very few said people had been nasty to them because of their faith. Of course, that isn’t everyone’s experience and there have been some tough court cases.
So, there are positives and negatives in the current picture. But we are living in a degenerating culture, and in a degenerating culture things we take for granted in terms of people’s behaviour might not always be there. I know one young woman working in recruitment where the workplace culture was so sexually abusive, and the HR department so unwilling to address it- that she left. So – a very mixed picture.
GJM: So what effect do you think the ‘working from home’ phenomenon that is still going on post-lockdown, has had on Christians seeking to live for Christ in the workplace?
Mark Greene: It’s complex, and we don’t really have adequate data on this yet – just in terms of how Covid has changed people’s sense of comfort in relating to people anymore. Social interaction in live settings can still be awkward for some people- and many people don’t want to go to parties where there are lots of people present. We have rings of relationships, with those closest to us at the centre; but for many folks those outer rings of relationships have been jettisoned.
Some people are saying that they are finding it easier to talk about more difficult or personal things, because Zoom meetings have sort-of brought people into their homes, their personal-space where they can see what books are on your shelf, or pictures on your wall. And then their child cries in the background or their dog wanders into view… so for some people things have got more personal! Again, an uneven picture, because for others home-working is isolating and impersonal.
GJM: One of my observations in the interviews I have done is that power seems to be significant in the workplace in terms of Christian witness – I wonder what your thoughts and observations are about that?
Mark Greene: Again, it’s difficult to make generalisations. Every workplace is different and they are all a foreign country. I think bad experiences tend to get amplified, lots of people have been told it’s really difficult, and it isn’t always the case. The framework for evangelism many people have, aggravates that sense that it is going to be difficult too. They are told to make a quick, bold, stand for the gospel in a way that can just look rude. We have emphasised sharing the gospel as just passing on information rather than through building relationships, which hasn’t helped this.
So, while the picture is mixed, the messaging is “bring your whole self to work”, which postmodernism says is OK. But ‘cancel-culture’ is creating a new dynamic. Christians fear that someone might ask them what they think about homosexuality, transgenderism or any of the other intersectionality issues. So there is some fear there and a sense of vulnerability. But as ever what is proving to be most helpful is when Christians build relationships with people. What is not helpful is when we act like hunters waiting for an opportunity to emerge from our hides to blast people with both barrels of the gospel, whenever we get a clear shot! But when Christians’ posture is that they approach their work as something they have been given to do by the King of the Universe who has filled them with His Spirit and placed them there amongst people He has called them to love, it’s more helpful. So instead of just looking for weaknesses in their arguments or ways in which they are sinning it means asking, ‘how can I celebrate these people and serve them through the work I do, and become a person who they trust?’ Sometimes the posture we have asked Christians to take has not been Spirit-led, but sounds as if it is driven by a ‘salvation by works’ attitude
We can learn an awful lot about everyday evangelism from the persecuted church actually. One North Korean woman was called by God to share the gospel in the re-education camp she had been sent to by the regime. That is an extremely dangerous thing to do, and she questioned God on it as indeed Ananias questioned God when he sent him to the church-persecuting Saul. And God replied, “I will show you who, and I will show you how.” And in the end they met in the latrines, the one place in the camp that so disgusting that the guards wouldn’t go there. So what if we prayed in the workplace, “Lord show me who and show me how” and then looked for the Spirit’s leading, because he changes everything. We need to allow people to rest confidently in the Spirit, and to be intentional about growing relationships with people in depth. Asking questions is a great way to grow relationships. Even asking people, “what are your three favourite films” enables people to get to know each other just slightly more deeply. You are not saying “what is your worldview?” but it might be very apparent in their answer. So, relational intentionality is key.
The other thing that is significant is around the dynamics of the workplace. Thinking about your own Frontline Interviewees, if you asked the pilot to do what the nurse did (or vice versa) neither would do well – because they are each operating in a completely different set of relational dynamics. So in the workplace there are times when it is busy and times when it is less busy, there are places where people go to chat – and places they don’t, times of the year when there are parties, times when there are not. One friend of mine realised that in the culture where she lived, importance was presented as busyness; so people walked fast and rushed everywhere – even on the school run. She decided to walk slowly, in order to communicate availability – and as a result managed to begin to develop relationships with people in her community. So I told that story of “missional adjustment” to a friend who works for a major publishing company. She reflected that in her workplace they have launch parties for new publications, with authors and prosecco – but that most people never go to them. But she decided that she was going to go, because in the rhythms of her workplace, that was somewhere she could talk to people. Other people deliberately arrive at meetings five minutes early, so that they have a little time for people before the agenda begins.
The reason these simple things work is because they all provide ways to build relationships with people.
One of the things I am now looking at in more depth is how to help Christians to find ways to grow in the fruitfulness of their witness by exploring three pathways: a relational pathway – how, over time, can I build a relationship of trust with someone; a skills pathway – how can we help people grow in their ability to talk naturally about the difference Jesus makes in their lives; and a knowledge pathway – how over time can we grow in our ability to respond to the questions that ‘my’ particular person has
Take the skills pathway for a moment. Here’s an example of something simple. Some churches in Southall had done ‘Faithfulness on the Frontline” and invited me to a deanery celebration service. It was a beautifully racially diverse congregation wonderfully reflecting Southall. A seven-year old girl was interviewed by the vicar who asked her how she talks about Jesus at her culturally diverse school. She replied, “Well I ask my friends what they like about their god, and then I tell them what I like about mine”. So we use that story in our evangelism training and say to people, “Find someone in the room you are not sitting next to and tell them what you like about Jesus. You have sixty seconds each”. Most people have never done that, but time and again they feel equipped just by trying it. Some of the answers that come out are amazing by the way. One man said, ‘As the husband of one wife and the father of three girls, I just love the way Jesus treats women’. Someone in politics said they loved how radical Jesus was. All sorts of people honoured different things they saw in Jesus. The point is they practiced talking about Jesus in a safe place and that we trusted helped them to do it when they were in a more challenging environment.
GJM: So what are your hopes and prayers for Christians in the workplace going forward?
Mark Greene: Jesus gave us a mission strategy and it was ‘as you go, make disciples’, not converts, members, programme volunteers but people learning to walk with him in their contexts at this time. And we will not see serious numbers of Christians equipped for the workplace unless churches become whole-life disciple-making communities, that is communities committed to helping one another grow and be fruitful in whatever context they find themselves. Over the last decade we at LICC have seen that it is possible to create whole-life disciple making churches and we have also seen a radical shift in denominations embracing the centrality of making whole-life disciples. The Church of England for example. It’s the same in other churches like Elim, PCI and others, in which whole-life discipleship is part of the conversation. We are praying that it becomes embedded in the culture. I remain hopeful however. And I am encouraged, because I now know of many churches who are ‘whole-life disciple making’ churches – who were not doing that twenty years ago. So, I am hopeful – God is at work! And I am encouraged too because hardly a week goes by without someone telling me something about how God is at work in their workplace.
GJM: Thanks Mark – there’s so much in there.
Mark Greene: Thanks for speaking to me – and for your Frontline interviews too.
Andy Bannister reports on a day of delightful partnership in Bristol
Have you ever wondered why we find loneliness so tough? Whilst we are richer, healthier and better connected, studies show that we are lonelier than ever in our society. But why do we have this deep need for connection with others? Is it just an evolutionary drive, or something deeper? In this episode of Short Answers, we consider why connection is increasingly difficult in our fast-paced world. And how God might fit into this picture…
Please share this video widely with friends or family and for more Short Answers videos, visit solas-cpc.org/shortanswers/, subscribe to our YouTube channel or visit us on Twitter Instagram or Facebook.
Short Answers is a viewer-supported video series: if you enjoy them, please help us continue to make them by donating to Solas. Visit our Donate page and choose “Digital Media Fund” under the Campaign/Appeal button.
Twenty years on, I can still remember the palpable sense of excitement as we sat in the packed cinema, the house lights dimmed, and the title card for The Fellowship of the Ring appeared on the screen. A cheer arose from the wildly enthusiastic audience (who had queued for several hours to get into this first screening) as the words of Galadriel (played by Cate Blanchett) solemnly intoned: “The world has changed. I see it in the water. I feel it in the Earth. I smell it in the air.”[1]
I am a massive Tolkien fan and have been ever since my teens and the day I first picked up a copy of The Lord of the Rings in a London bookshop. I still have that battered paperback on my shelf and I love the cover image by the artist John Howe, showing the wizard Gandalf striding across a hillside somewhere in Middle Earth. Since my teens I have continued to re-read The Lord of the Rings most years and I now have the pleasure of introducing it to my children. To further reinforce my fan credentials, I should let you know that I am writing this in a little wooden garden office we have affectionately named Bag End.[2]
Whether or not you’re a Tolkien fan, it’s hard to deny the huge influence upon literature and culture of his books The Hobbit and The Lord of the Rings. Indeed, Tolkien has been described as the most influential writer of the twentieth century—whether you measure that by sales (over 600 million copies and showing no sign of slowing), or by the way that Tolkien almost singlehandedly invented the popular fantasy genre.
For a book that is now almost 70 years old, its continuing impact is impressive. The six films based on The Lord of the Rings and The Hobbit have grossed over $6 billion whilst the new spin-off series, The Rings of Power cost Amazon $750 million, making it the most expensive TV series in history. All of this for a book written with almost no sense of commercial awareness—in the case of The Lord of the Rings, Tolkien’s publisher had asked him to write another children’s book as a follow-up to The Hobbit. Tolkien went away and wrote for the next 12 years before finally delivering a thousand-page manuscript entirely unlike anything that had ever been written before. No wonder the publisher’s initial reaction was panic!
Given how utterly uncommercial The Lord of the Rings was, what explains its incredible success and cultural influence? It must be something more than just good storytelling, good writing, good luck, or a sufficient supply of nerds to sustain an industry. Professor Tom Shippey, a world expert on Tolkien, catches something significant when he observes:
“The Lord of the Rings, and The Hobbit, have said something important, and meant something important, to a high proportion of their millions of readers. All but the professionally incurious might well ask, what? Is it something timeless? Is it something contemporary? Is it (and it is) both at once?”[3]
So what was it? I want to suggest that Tolkien said some incredibly important things about two of the most important questions that we face: namely the question of evil and the question of hope. What Tolkien discovered was that fantasy, far from being escapist, was a brilliant way to get us thinking about these themes without realising that we are thinking about them.
THE QUESTION OF EVIL
J.R. R. Tolkien was one of a generation of “traumatized writers” who lived through the horrors of the First World War, an experience that was utterly psychological devastating. In his first year of service as a soldier he fought in the Battle of the Somme, one of the bloodiest battles of the war, and Tolkien would later observe:
“By 1918 all but one of my close friends were dead”.[4]
The first World War (and later, the Second World War) shattered the naïve belief that many people had nurtured that the world was getting progressively better and that humans were (on the whole) pretty good and decent. Yet in both world wars, monstrosities were carried out by both sides, often by people who believed that the ends justified the means.
We need little reminding of the dreadful reality of human wickedness today. Whether it’s Putin waging war in Europe, the Chinese ethnically cleansing the Uighurs and Tibetans, human trafficking on an imaginable scale, civil wars ripping many countries apart, and, closer to home, Western societies increasingly vicious and tribalized, with new technologies like social media offering us new ways to be mean and beastly, it is clear that something is sick at the heart of humanity.
Tolkien certainly thought so and he considered most of the “answers” he heard about evil to be weak and unhelpful. And so he chose to explore the nature of evil and its effect on us through the medium of one of his most famous creations, the Ring.
The first thing to note are the temptations that the Ring offers to the characters in the story. It offers the power to overcome death (think of Sauron himself, or Gollum, or Bilbo to whom the Ring had given unnaturally long life). This temptation is ever present today, especially in a secular age where for many people staying alive is the only thing that matters. We’re terrified of death, hiding it away behind hospital doors or attempting to “solve” it with technological solutions such as euthanasia.
The Ring also tempts with the power of invisibility—the ability to do whatever one wishes with no fear of being seen. Again, there are echoes in our contemporary age with the tendency for many of us to behave more viciously on social media where we can hide behind the veil of anonymity.
Lastly, perhaps the greatest temptation of the Ring is the power to coerce the will of others, bending them to serve your ambitions, schemes, and designs. The contemporary examples of that temptation are too many to list—whether it’s manipulative politicians, vast media empires spinning their fabrics of half-truths, or closer to home, the tendency we all have in this identity driven age to make everything about me and my desires. As the famous nineteenth-century atheist Friedrich Nietzsche remarked, when you reject God, all that is left is the “will to power”.[5]
Yet Tolkien didn’t merely illustrate the temptations that are whispered in all our ears, but through the Ring explored the idea of creeping corruption, the insidious way that most humans do not become monstrous overnight, but through a repeated series of poor choices, risk becoming ever more twisted. Think of characters like Bilbo (who asks Frodo to let him have a “little peep” at the Ring and then in Frodo’s eyes becomes “a little wrinkled creature with a hungry face and bony groping hands”;[6] or Isildur (who refuses to destroy the Ring when he has the chance); or Boromir (who tries to take the Ring from Frodo by force because he thinks it can be used as a weapon against the enemy); or Gollum, or even Frodo himself. Tolkien repeatedly shows us that evil has an addictive quality—that though we think a little dabbling with it is harmless, each time we do so, it becomes easier to give in the next time, until ultimately evil overwhelms us, like the Ringwraiths in The Lord of the Rings, who freely chose the gifts of Sauron but ended up utterly consumed.
In J. R. R. Tolkien: Author of the Century, Tom Shippey points out that historically there have been two major views of evil.[7] The first view is that evil does not “exist”, but is simply the absence of good; for example those bits of my psychology that are perhaps a bit deficient. The problem with this view is it can lead to naivety (“All I need is a bit of positive thinking or some self-help”). The other ancient view is that evil is a thing, it actually exists, and is deadly serious. The problem here is that it can easily lead to a sense of superiority over others (“I’m okay because I’m a good person; not like those people.”).
Throughout The Lord of the Rings, Tolkien plays with the idea that there are elements of truth in both those views; for example, consider the scene in Bag End where Gandalf asks Frodo to give him the Ring for a moment. Frodo goes to hand it to the wizard and we’re told that:
“It suddenly felt very heavy, as if either it or Frodo himself was in some way reluctant for Gandalf to touch it.”[8]
But which is it? Is evil an actual thing—in which case the Ring is heavy because it is evil, imbued with the spirit of its master, Sauron, and it does not want Gandalf to handle it. Or is evil a mere absence, a shadow, an inner psychological weakness—in which case it is Frodo who does not really wish to hand it over.
Tolkien plays with these two aspects of evil throughout the book and not because he was sitting on the fence, but because he believed that both views of evil had something going for them, yet neither is sufficient. And he believed this because he was a committed Christian and his Christian faith was deeply embedded into the structures of The Lord of the Rings. As Tolkien wrote to a friend:
“The Lord of the Rings is of course a fundamentally religious and Catholic work; unconsciously at first, but consciously in the revision … the religious element is absorbed into the story and the symbolism.”[9]
As a Christian, one of the things with which Tolkien would have been very familiar was the Lord’s Prayer, the prayer that Jesus taught his followers and which is prayed regularly by billions of Christians around the world in church services and private devotions. Two of the lines of that prayer run like this:
Lead us not into temptation;
But deliver us from evil;[10]
That prayer seems to recognise that we need help with two things when it comes to evil—first, we need protecting from ourselves; second, we need help from the evil outside. Tolkien wove both those ideas into The Lord of the Rings and indeed in the key scene of the final book, they come to a climax. For on the very brink of the Cracks of Doom, when Frodo makes the decision not to destroy the Ring, the age-old question arises—is this Frodo’s own internal decision, or has the evil force of the Ring overpowered him? Tom Shippey came across a letter from Tolkien in which he comments that the scene at the Cracks of the Doom was deliberately designed to unpack the Lord’s Prayer as a “fairy-story exemplum”.[11]
Is evil internal or external? The Lord of the Rings would remind us that the answer is both—and that we are wholly naïve if we think we are not affected by evil, nor that we need help in overcoming both the evil out there as well as the evil within. Indeed, as another “traumatized writer”, Aleksander Solzhenitsyn, reminds us:
“The line between good and evil passes not through states, nor between classes, nor between political parties either, but right through the middle of every human heart and through all human hearts.”[12]
THE QUESTION OF HOPE
Given a world in which real evil exists—an insidious, creeping evil that can tempt and overpower even the very good, what should our response be? This question leads to the second major theme of The Lord of the Rings, the question of hope.
There is a strong contrast running throughout Tolkien’s book concerning those who have given up all hope and those who, no matter the odds, still choose hope over despair when confronted by evil. On the side of those who have given up, one thinks of the wizard Saruman, who explains his choice to side with Sauron because:
“A new power is rising. Against it the old allies and policies will not avail us at all … This then is the one choice before you, before us. We may join with that Power … Its victory is at hand; and there will be rich reward for those that aided it.”[13]
Or consider the tragic figure of Denethor, the Steward of Gondor, who because of the death of his son, the lies that Sauron has been feeding him, and the fear of the battle that lies ahead, has wholly given into despair—a downward spiral that in the end costs him his life.
However, by way of contrast, we have King Théoden (who has also lost a son) who declares that even though they will probably be defeated, he will still lead his calvary in a final charge against the massed ranks of Mordor. Similarly there is Aragorn, at the Black Gates, leading the remains of his army into what appears to be a suicide mission but doing it “for Frodo”. Or Boromir, giving his life in a last stand against the Orcs despite the overwhelming odds. Or the Elves, for over a thousand years fighting what Galadriel calls “the long defeat”,[14] knowing that their time is ending, but nevertheless still opting to choose hope over despair. Repeatedly throughout The Lord of the Rings, the heroes make choices with catastrophic personal consequences because they believe that it is the right thing to do.
You will recall that Tolkien had lived through two world wars and had experienced leaders who had chosen to capitulate in the face of evil; think of Neville Chamberlain and his naive attempts to negotiate “peace in our time” with Hitler. Or so-called “neutral” countries during WWII, like Sweden, which turned a blind eye to evil in return for which the Nazis would leave them alone. Tolkien had little time for the idea that faced with overwhelming evil, the best thing to do was keep your head down, or surrender to despair.
Yet this is all very well, you may ask, but what if the odds are truly overwhelming? If the Swedes had resisted Hitler, wouldn’t they have been conquered? What if a Putin-like mad man really did hover his finger over the red button saying, “Allow me to do what I want, or I flick the switch?” Since he was a young man, Tolkien had loved the tales of Norse mythology which are fascinating because like so many mythologies and religious beliefs, end with a climactic battle between good and evil. But in that mythology, the forces of evil won and history ended with Ragnarök, the destruction of the gods.
Tolkien thought a lot about the issues this idea raised: if you knew that evil was going to win, should you just pick the winning side? Should you align with Mordor, switch over to Putin, side with the Nazis? Or was the right thing to do to fight for good, even if you knew that you were going to lose? Tolkien believed that courage meant that it was: as Sam Gamgee puts it powerfully in the movie version of The Two Towers:
“It’s like in the great stories, Mr Frodo. The ones that really mattered. Full of darkness and danger they were, and sometimes you didn’t want to know the end. Because how could the end be happy? … [But] there’s some good in this world, Mr. Frodo, and it’s worth fighting for.”
NO NAÏVE ANSWERS
Although Tolkien was a deeply committed Christian, this did not lead him to write naïve answers to life’s toughest questions into The Lord of the Rings. Sometimes Christians are caricatured as being tempted to simplistic “it’ll all be right in the end” answers, but Tolkien refused to go that route in his epic novel. However, as he wrote in a letter to a friend:
“I am a Christian … so I do not expect ‘history’ to be anything but a ‘long defeat’—though it contains some samples or glimpses of final victory.”[15]
And such glimpses of final victory can likewise be seen within The Lord of the Rings. For example, there are numerous hints of the idea of resurrection (for example Tom Bombadil’s command to the barrow-wight to go ‘where the gates are ever shut, till the world is mended’).[16] Even more powerfully, there is the concept of eucatastrophe, a word coined by Tolkien as the antithesis to ‘catastrophe’ to describe the way that just when things seem their very bleakest, sometimes it turns out that Providence is working something very different behind the scenes. Think of the moment where the armies of Gondor are about to be defeated at the Gates of Mordor whilst simultaneously at the Cracks of Doom all equally seems lost (Frodo has failed and Gollum has recaptured the Ring, only at that very moment to fall over the cliff, plummeting to his and the Ring’s destruction, thus bringing about the end of Sauron’s power). As Tolkien wrote in his essay ‘On Fairy Stories’:
“[Eucatastrophe] denies (in the face of much evidence, if you will) universal final defeat and in so far is evangelium [=good news], giving a fleeting glimpse of Joy, Joy beyond the walls of the world, poignant as grief.”[17]
Tolkien was not willing to merely repeat the Christian story, nor to construct a simple allegory (a medium he said he was not fond of) but he scatters hints and pointers to the Christian story throughout The Lord of the Rings—from themes such as evil and courage, or self-sacrifice and self-denial, or joy and hope.[18] Indeed, it is surely no accident that Aragorn, the “king” in The Return of the King also bears an Elvish name, Estel,[19] which means “hope”—a pointer to the return of the true and greater king whose return is our only hope in the face of evil.
Why has The Lord of the Rings had such enduring power? Because Tolkien understood not merely that great stories can be truly captivating, but that the most captivating stories derive their power from the extent to which they foreshadow, hint at, and point to the greatest story of all—the story of the Jesus and his ultimate defeat of evil that has all the greater power because it is true.[20]
[1] In the book, those words are spoken by Treebeard the Ent, in the chapter ‘Many Partings’ in The Return of the King.
[2] I wanted to call it Rivendell but my nine-year old daughter, who possesses the gifts of sarcasm and honesty in equal amounts, remarked: “Daddy, Rivendell was the home of the elves, who were six-foot tall and blonde. You’re short and grey. You need a hobbit-y name.” And so Bag End it was.
[3] Tom Shippey, J. R. R. Tolkien: Author of the Century (London: HarperCollins, 2000) p. xxvi. I owe many of the observations in this essay to Shippey.
[4] J. R. R. Tolkien, ‘Foreword to the Second Edition’, The Lord of the Rings.
[5] This is a concept that Nietzsche used repeatedly, initially in Thus Spoke Zarathustra (1883). See also Friedrich Nietzsche, The Will to Power (1901).
[6] ‘Many Meetings’, The Fellowship of the Ring.
[7] Shippey, Tolkien, p. 128ff.
[8] ‘The Shadow of the Past’, The Fellowship of the Ring.
[9] Humphrey Carpenter, ed., The Letters of J. R. R. Tolkien (New York: Houghton Mifflin, 2000), p. 172.
[10] Matthew 6:13.
[11] Shippey, Tolkien, p.142.
[12] Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, The Gulag Archipelago: 1918-1956 (New York: HarperCollins, 2002) p.75.
[13] ‘The Council of Elrond’, The Fellowship of the Ring.
[14] ‘The Mirror of Galadriel’, The Fellowship of the Ring.
[15] J. R. R. Tolkien, ‘From a letter to Amy Ronald 15 December 1956’, Humphrey Carpenter & Christopher Tolkien (editors), The Letters of J. R. R. Tolkien (London: George, Allen & Unwin, 1981).
[16] ‘Fog on the Barrow Downs’, The Fellowship of the Ring. See too the discussion in Shippey, Tolkien, p.178.
[17] J. R. R. Tolkien, On Fairy Stories (London: HarperCollins, 2014 [1947]) p.75.
[18] It is worth noting that when one consults the chronology of The Lord of the Rings found in appendix B of The Return of the King, one discovers that Tolkien has aligned his story with the key dates of the Christian story; for the Fellowship depart from Rivendell on Christmas Day, December 25th, and the Ring is destroyed on March 25th, the traditional date of Easter in the Old English calendar.
[19] See Appendix A, part V, The Return of the King.
[20] This was a point that J. R. R. Tolkien made to C. S. Lewis and was instrumental in the latter’s conversion; see Justin Taylor, ‘85 Years Ago Today: J. R. R. Tolkien Convinces C. S. Lewis That Christ Is the True Myth’, The Gospel Coalition, 20 September 2016, bit.ly/3GrDwUf.
It was great to travel to the Channel Island of Jersey, for a few days of ministry in churches, schools and out in the community. I also had the opportunity to lead the first ever Solas Confident Christianity conference on the island. About 35-40 people from three or four different churches came together for the event, based in St Helier, the island’s capital.
As usual, “How to talk about Jesus without looking like an idiot” was my opening session at Confident Christianity – and that is because it looks at the way that Jesus himself communicated, and I invited people to learn from him. Then we went into a session called “Good God / Bad World: Why Does A Loving God Permit Suffering?” That will always be a key subject to address, as it so often comes up in evangelism. One of the things we looked at there was learning to speak with pastoral sensitivity; not just intellectual or philosophical credibility when answering questions in this area. “What’s so unique about Jesus” – was our final session. It’s another really important subject to tackle in our context today as we share the gospel in a pluralistic world with competing truth-claims.
After some discussion-time there was the usual Q&A, which was (as is so often the case) a highlight of these events. Chatting to several of the people there during coffee breaks and at the end, it became clear that they had never been to an event of this kind before – and they weren’t aware of anything like it ever having been held on the island either. It felt that we were genuinely breaking new ground there, because while individual Christians in the fairly small church community there, have been active in sharing their faith; they hadn’t gathered together to get better equipped and trained and to encourage each other in evangelism. Having done a half-day Confident Christianity conference the churches have invited me back in 18 months time, because they think that a bigger event in the Spring/Summer for churches across the whole island will be worthwhile for them.
The connection between Solas and the St Helier churches began in the middle of 2020 – which as you probably remember was the middle of lockdown. I was contacted by Simon Lewis, who is a Maths teacher at Jersey College for Girls. They had come across our Short Answers videos, and had been using them in school’s Christian Union group. So, Simon emailed me and asked if I’d be willing to do an event for them online. The idea was not just go beyond showing our videos, and give the students the opportunity to interact with the content and ask questions. I was delighted to help them with that, and then subsequently received an invitation to visit the island in person. He sounded surprised that I said I would love to. One of the privileges of working for Solas is that I do get to see some wonderful places, meet great people, see what the churches are doing and be a resource for them too.
So it was great to be In Jersey, to make friends and work with the churches there. I look forward to being able to go back.
If you have friends, colleagues or neighbours from Muslim backgrounds, this episode is for you! There are incredible opportunities in our own diverse society to interact with followers of Islam. What are some of the best ways to introduce them to Jesus? Andy and Kristi have a guest from Australia with some helpful advice.
https://feeds.zencastr.com/f/1h9kQLF-.rssRichard Shumack is a philosopher of religion who is fascinated by how and why people hold their religious beliefs. He is the Director of the Arthur Jeffery Centre for the Study of Islam, at Melbourne School of Theology and, with his wife Judy, is on the pastoral team at Springwood Presbyterian Church in the NSW Blue Mountains. His research specialty is certainty and doubt in religious belief, and he is the author of “Jesus Through Muslim Eyes”, and the philosophical apologetic “The Wisdom of Islam and the Foolishness of Christianity”. He loves Australian football, golf, eating curries, and making and playing acoustic guitars.
The Persuasive Evangelism Podcast aims to equip listeners to share their faith more effectively in a sceptical world. Each episode, Andy Bannister (Solas) and Kristi Mair (Oak Hill College) chat to a guest who has a great story, a useful resource, or some other expertise that helps equip you to talk persuasively, winsomely, and engagingly with your friends, colleagues and neighbours about Jesus.
As part of my mission trip to the Isle of Jersey we did some schools work, and a Confident Christianity conference.However the church in St Helier wanted a complete set of Solas events and so set they up an outreach event too. That was really encouraging because when we travel to a town, village (or island!) to do Confident Christianity, we love having the opportunity to do some evangelism there too. In fact, increasingly when churches invite us to do training events we ask them to include some direct evangelism in the programme while we are with them, too.
The church in Jersey was very up for this challenge so they found a good neutral venue and booked it. The used a nice hotel not far from the church building which had a lovely medium-sized function room in it and hosted an early evening event there. Late evening functions usually involve a dinner, but starting at 6:00PM meant that they only had to provide lighter refreshments for the 50-60 people who came and filled the venue.
There were probably more Christians than non-Christian guests there for this one. There were some questions in the Q&A which were clearly from seekers though, which meant that it was worthwhile in terms of the purpose of the event. These type of things work best when the audience is at least 50% non-Christian, and the church there are already talking about how they can repeat the event but also diversify the audience a bit more next time too.
I spoke on my favourite non-cheerful topic, “Pain, Pandemics and Putin: Where Is Hope to be Found?”. The point of that talk is to do a big “compare and contrast” exercise. Given the rubbish going on in the world, is there any hope? On atheism, ultimately we’re all doomed – it is a very depressing world-view. Interestingly of course you can’t actually judge Putin credibly either. So you have a double problem, (a)– we’re all doomed and (b)- you have no basis for morality, because you’ve reduced it all to personal preferences. Christianity offers an answer to both those things, it both grounds morality and offers hope. But you have to be careful with those things – because it does not mean that our message is “become a Christian and all your problems will immediately be solved”, rather that in this world with all its many problems – hope can be found. Real hope is grounded in Jesus Christ, which 1 Peter describes as, “this sure and certain hope”.
The Q&A time was interesting too. One particularly important question took our evening into considering the uniqueness of Jesus. Obviously the questioner had agreed with what I shared about the inadequacies of the atheist worldview but wondered if all religions could solve the problem equally well. That allowed me to talk about why I think Jesus is uniquely the saviour.
The organisers seemed to be really pleased with the way the evening had gone and were already talking about “the next time we do one of these” on the night! What encouraged me is that it shows that the format works. If you go into those ‘neutral spaces’ people will come and engage. We sometimes ask Christians to imagine how uncomfortable you might feel going into a mosque to observe Friday prayers – and then realise that that is how a lot of non-Christian people can feel walking into a church. But that doesn’t mean that they are not interested in Jesus, the gospel, or the big questions of life, or that they wouldn’t happily step into a café, hotel or curry house to listen to a talk and ask questions.
Q&A is an important part of these evangelistic events too – we always encourage churches to include it in their outreach. Firstly a lot of people think that Christians involved in evangelism would rather bash them with a Bible than have a respectful conversation, which involves listening as well as speaking. So it’s important to allow people to change the subject from your talk and ask any question they want, or to push-back and disagree with an element of the talk if they want to as well. It puts people at their ease to know that their questions and views are welcome. Secondly, a talk like “Pain, Pandemics and Putin” really only opens up the whole issue of God and suffering – and Q&A invites people to respond to the way that they have been affected by pain and suffering, in ways that can’t be addressed in a short talk. Then it is really important to show people that we take their questions seriously and then to model ways of answering them which demonstrate compassion and show Christ by the way in which we answer, as much as in the content of the answers. Asking people’s names as they raise questions, never getting frustrated with awkward lines of questioning – are all important in this regard.
Starting to introduce Q&A into your outreach ministry can be very difficult if it is not something that you’ve been used to doing. It can be incredibly daunting at first, in fact. I’m a big believer that anyone can do it with a bit of practice, and if you are a pastor or leader why not take the radical step of introducing this within church, before you take it out as an evangelistic tool. One way to do that is to take questions at the end of a sermon, perhaps once a month. Allow people to text their questions in so that they have the anonymity to ask questions they might not freely do from the floor. Then do the same with the young people’s group, before trying a “sceptics night” when you invite people in to ask their questions. It’s amazing how quickly you can pick Q&A answering up. Of course, you need to know that one person can’t know all the answers so it’s OK to say when you don’t know or to say that you need to go away and do some research about something and get back to them.
So we were really grateful to the church In Jersey for setting all this up for their community and inviting us to participate in their gospel ministry.