News

Atheist says Queen’s funeral was ‘empty and platitudinous’. I disagree.

On Monday 19th September I gathered with a small group of family and friends to watch the funeral of Queen Elizabeth II. We were not alone—almost four billion people globally watched the service from Westminster Abbey.

I found the funeral profoundly moving but although there was sadness, the service was not in the slightest way depressing, for the Queen’s funeral was deeply and thoroughly Christian, saturated throughout with a message of joy and hope, the good news that for the follower of Jesus, death is not the end. As the final hymn that the Queen herself had chosen proclaimed:

Finish then thy new creation,
pure and spotless let us be;
let us see thy great salvation,
perfectly restored in thee,
changed from glory into glory
till in heaven we take our place,
till we cast our crowns before thee,
lost in wonder, love, and praise!

Existential despair

Not everybody was so impressed by that message of hope in the face of death. Whilst the funeral was still in progress, journalist and broadcaster Ian Dunt tweeted:

The first thing that struck me about Ian’s comment was his honesty. There can sometimes be a tendency for atheists to pretend that life is all rainbows, roses and kittens—think of that terrible bus slogan from a few years ago: “There’s probably no god: now stop worrying and enjoy your life.” Now there’s a platitude with attitude. But Ian is at least honest enough to recognise that suffering and despair are a grim reality of life.

Other atheists go further still. In his best-selling book, Sapiens: A Brief History of Humankind, Yuval Noah Harari writes: “Any meaning that people ascribe to their lives is just a delusion.”

For Harari, it’s not just religious people who try to fend off existential despair with falsehoods, but everybody. Life is meaningless, period—and so Dunt is guilty of not going far enough. Quick to criticise the “cardboard shield” of religion, he hopes you won’t notice his own paper cocktail umbrella of comfort.

Is religion empty?

The second thing I noticed about Ian’s tweet was his criticism that religion is “terribly empty and platitudinous”. Aside from the point that in atheism, everything humans do is ultimately empty, I’d again go further than Ian and observe that all of us can be tempted to shallowness. For every Christian who doesn’t get beyond tweeting “Jesus is the answer”, there are at least as many atheists who mindlessly parrot soundbites like “faith is irrational”. Perhaps the world might be more a civil place if we were all a bit more robust in our thinking.

And Biblical faith certainly is robust. It’s easy to forget that much of the Bible was written by people who were suffering, who knew full well that the world was a messy and broken place, for whom despair was an ever-present temptation. And throughout two thousand years of Christian history, biblical faith has been battle-tested as Christians have discovered that faith in Jesus does provide solace when one is faced with war, disease, persecution, or death. I wonder if Ian needs to get out a bit more and talk to Christians in places like Iran, or China, or North Korea.

We’re all going to die

But let’s return to Ian’s remark about “existential despair”. Given all that’s going on in the world right now (pandemics, Putin and financial chaos) and the grim fact that death awaits all of us, what should we do? You basically have three options. First, you could just give up—indeed the famous French atheist Albert Camus once remarked: “There is but one truly serious philosophical problem and that is suicide.”

If that seems a bit extreme, option two is to distract yourself. There’s an old Indian folktale about a man stuck on a raft that is approaching a huge waterfall that will almost certainly kill him. After trying to rescue himself by paddling (but the current is too strong and the river too wide), he decides to lie back, put his arms behind his head and whistle away the minutes until his doom. We can do the same: try to use TV, or music, or sex, or some other pleasure to distract us from our impending doom.

If neither killing yourself nor distracting yourself sound particularly promising, maybe it’s time to consider option three and give religion a proper look. After all, if there is a god behind the universe (not merely the blind forces of time, chance and physics) that would give us a proper basis for human value, for meaning, and perhaps offer the possibility that death is not the end (along the way explaining our instinct to see death as unnatural and something to rage against).

True religion

Queen Elizabeth was not simply ‘religious’, nor was her faith in some generic wishy-washy god with a lower case ‘g’. Rather she trusted in the God of the Bible, a God who stepped into history in the person of Jesus. In the New Testament, Peter, one of Jesus’s closest friends and followers, writing to a group of Christians being persecuted for their faith, says this:

“Praise be to the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ! In his great mercy he has given us new birth into a living hope through the resurrection of Jesus Christ from the dead, and into an inheritance that can never perish, spoil or fade.”

The living hope that Christians have, says Peter, is not empty or platitudinous, not based on wishful thinking but is grounded on the resurrection of Jesus from the dead—an event that took place in the full light of history (and to which Peter was one of the earliest group of eyewitnesses). Yes, life may be tough, says Peter, but we know that there is hope to be found for those, like the Queen, who place their trust in Jesus, the one who has overcome death and decay.

One of the hallmarks of Queen Elizabeth’s life was her devotion to duty and service. As the Archbishop of Canterbury, Justin Welby, put it in his sermon at the funeral:

“People of loving service are rare in any walk of life. Leaders of loving service are still rarer.”

Concrete hope

Is the Queen’s example of duty and service inspiring? Well, if we live in a godless universe, with nothing more than atoms and particles, then I’m afraid she was actually a fool. She’d have been far better off, like so many leaders throughout history, using her power for personal gain and pleasure. If Ian Dunt is correct, the best thing one can do is try to die with the most toys, wins, right?

But what if we don’t live in a godless universe? What if there is a bigger, deeper, truer story, one that gives us a concrete foundation for hope, a foundation for believing that everything sad-and-bad will one day become undone, a foundation for believing this life is not all there is, a foundation for hoping—for knowing—that death, despair, and doom are not the last word, but that love is the last word? In which case, in following Jesus, Queen Elizabeth II made the wisest choice of all.

This article was first published at Premier Unbelievable.

Image: BBC iPlayer

How Do I Become a Christian?

Maybe you’ve been exploring the Christian faith for sometime and realise you now need to make a decision. Perhaps you’ve been looking at Jesus’s life, teaching and claims for a while and you know you need to respond. So how do you become a follower of Jesus? In this very practical episode of Short Answers, Andy Bannister helps explain how you can become a Christian.

Share

Please share this video widely with friends or family and for more Short Answers videos, visit solas-cpc.org/shortanswers/, subscribe to our YouTube channel or visit us on Twitter Instagram or Facebook.

Support

Short Answers is a viewer-supported video series: if you enjoy them, please help us continue to make them by donating to Solas. Visit our Donate page and choose “Digital Media Fund” under the Campaign/Appeal button.

Have you ever wondered why music has the power to move us?

Most of us (unless we are musicians) probably don’t think too deeply about music. But imagine for a moment, if you can, a world without it. Imagine a film with no sound track. A wedding where the bride walks in to the church in complete silence. Or a Six nations rugby match where the anthems are simply spoken rather than sung.

In one sense life could continue perfectly fine without music. The story line of the film would be unaffected. The couple would still get married. The game would still be played.

Yet in a deeper more profound way we would have lost something precious. While the soundtrack to a film is not something we are always consciously aware of, it plays a huge part in helping us to ‘feel’ the emotion of what we are seeing. The music accompanying the bride’s entrance to the church deepens the beauty and solemnity of the moment. And as for singing the anthems… I’m sure that for the Welsh rugby team at least, the sound of 80,000 of your compatriots singing the anthem is worth at least at 10 point head start!

Music is powerful. It can stir our emotions, awaken our desires, and instil courage.

But where does music come from? Why is it so important to us.

How you answer that question depends on how you view the world more generally. If life is simply the result of the evolutionary process (and nothing more) as many atheists believe, then accounting for the beauty of music is problematic.

The analytical philosopher, Patricia Churchland expressed her view of the world this way:  ‘The principle chore of brains is to get the body parts where they should be in order that the organism may survive. A fancier style of representing the world is advantageous as long as it enhances the organism’s chances for survival.’

In such a view a thing is only really good in as much as it helps us survive. But does music exist simply exist to enhance our chances of survival?

At one level it might explain some things. Perhaps, for instance, the ability to create music might make one more attractive to a potential mate? Perhaps that would explain why among my friends during my teenage years, so many of us learnt the guitar?!

Yet like so many evolutionary explanations, while this may explain why some people might make some music, it seems a fairly poor as explanation for everything from Bach to Bon Jovi.

While this line of argument may seem satisfactory to some, interestingly it doesn’t seem to convince many musicians. I was recently chatting a friend who, like myself, works in universities across the country. They commented that while they have met many atheists in studying many different things, they were yet to find one that was studying music. I’m not saying that there aren’t therefore any musicians who are atheists but, anecdotally at least, it would seem there aren’t so many. Why is this the case?

In my own work in universities one of the big reasons I have heard people give as to why they don’t believe in God is the presence of so much evil and suffering in the world. How can God exist in a world that seems at times to be so utterly futile? This is a good question and one that deserves an article all of its own.

But, if the presence of so much ugliness in the world turns us away from the idea of God, what do we do with beauty when we stumble across it? Music seems to have a way of tearing us away from the mundane futility of life and confronting us with beauty.

An example of this happened to me on a school trip to London many years ago. I can’t remember the main purpose of the trip but I do recall very distinctly a moment in Covent Garden at the end of the day. We happened to walk past a string quartet just as they were starting to play Pachelbel’s Canon in D. I had never heard the piece before but I remember being struck by the incredible beauty of the music as it filled the air. The bustle of the passing shoppers seemed to diminish as I became enraptured by what I was hearing.

Without a word being spoken I had somehow been reminded, even in the midst of a busy market, that there is real beauty in this world. It’s a memory I will never forget.

The 20th century author, CS Lewis also spoke about how a childhood experience of beauty spoke to him powerfully later in life. He was, for much of his life, an atheist and one of his main reasons for not believing in God was the unnecessary suffering he saw in the world. Yet for Lewis, the memory of that experience of unnecessary beauty haunted him. That moment had created a deep sense of joy that he found hard to shake. It was this experience of beauty and the joy that it produced, that was one of the main influences in him eventually coming to embrace the Christian faith. He later wrote about this experience in his book ‘Surprised by Joy’.

Could the beauty of music awaken us to our desire for something beyond what we can see, touch and even hear? Could our experiences of beauty be, as Lewis said elsewhere, ‘the scent of a flower we have not found, the echo of a tune we have not heard, news from a country we have never yet visited.’

It seems that beauty, experienced through music has a way of challenging even the most sceptical to reconsider their view of the world. The philosopher Paul Gould explains how music has been doing that in Japan. In a country that has traditionally been unreceptive to the claims of the Christian faith he explains that the music of Johann Sebastian Bach now plays a key role in promoting the Christian faith in the country. He comments that ‘…many Japanese are considering or even converting to Christianity after hearing his music.’

But why? He explains ‘The beauty [of Bach] has prompted the Japanese to ask: How can Bach exist in a world full of despair and loneliness? Answering the question has set several Japanese people on the path to Jesus, who is source of Bach’s inspiration and the source of beauty itself.’

Yet, you might ask, why do we need to bring God into it? Can’t we just be thankful to the composers who created such music? But do we really just create music or do we in some sense also discover it? As I child I loved to create things with Lego (ok, I’ll admit it – I sometimes still do!). But I didn’t create Lego – I simply work with the pieces that have already been made. In a similar sense it seems that might be what we are doing with music – working with what we have already been given to create something that can be beautiful. Therefore, behind the beauty of the music could it be that we are invited to discover not just the genius of the composer or artist, but also the ultimate composer and artist that stands behind it all?

Encouraging times with Trinity Church, London

Trinity Church London is a fairly new church which has been planted right in the heart of the capital. It’s not just a new church in terms of being ‘not having been there long’, but also new in that there are a lot of new Christians there. Trinity is also representative of London because the church is youthful, vibrant and incredibly diverse, in languages, cultures, backgrounds and ethnicities.

Andy Bannister and Stefan Gustavsson came across Trinity through contacts at the European Leadership Forum, and so were invited to visit the church in London, for a couple of days of ministry.

The aim of all the events and services which took place was to enable the Christians there to grow in the confidence and ability to their faith effectively, engage with culture, and answer the tough questions that people are asking today. Andy Bannister commented, “I was really impressed with the people I met there, across all kinds of trades and professions who are actively seeking to represent Jesus in secular workplaces across the city”.

Andy kicked the training day off with his talk, “How to share your faith at work without getting fired or cancelled”, which is Solas’ traditional starting point for all things “conversational evangelism!” After that Andy tag-teamed with Stefan as they worked their way through a whole range of key issues which Christian face today. They looked at the reliability of scripture, the uniqueness of Jesus, sexuality and identity too! That, perhaps unsurprisingly led into a very lively Q&A at the end!

During the afternoon the church had their worship services too. Stefan addressed the English speaking congregation, but Andy was invited to speak to the Iranian group, his words being translated into Farsi by Mehran, their pastor. This was a real highlight for Andy, as he was able to explore some of the main themes of his book “Do Christians and Muslims Worship the Same God?” with an audience packed full of people who had grown up immersed in Islamic thinking. Andy was hugely encouraged by the incredibly enthusiastic response with which his message about the uniqueness of Christ was

Andy and Stefan were back at Trinity the following day too. This time however, they were not addressing the whole congregations that make up the church, but spent time with the leadership. They looked together at ‘apologetics and the life of the church’ and ‘equipping church members to deal with tough questions.’

Trinity is a very missional church, which is really serious about helping people outside their membership to see Jesus and the answers he provides to the questions of life and eternity. In fact, the words “sceptics welcome” is one of the first things you will see if you visit their website. Week by week they engage with many people, through leafleting, coffee wagons in Trafalga Square and many other ways of reaching out. They result is that they have become a church that looks like the diversity of the city in which they serve – and wonderful place for Andy and Stefan to serve for the weekend.

Remembering Her Majesty, Queen Elizabeth II

It is with a deep sense of sadness that the Trustees, and staff of Solas learned of the passing of Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II. For over 70 years Queen Elizabeth inspired the whole community by her deep Christian convictions and her unswerving commitment, affirmed in a vow taken before God, to give unstinting service to the British nation and to the many peoples that make up the British Commonwealth of Nations. We extend our deepest condolences to His Royal Highness, King Charles III and to her Royal Highness Princess Anne, and their Royal Highnesses, Prince Andrew and Prince Edward and to their families. 
We are committed in Solas to train and inspire Christians to share their faith with compassion.  We are therefore grateful to Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth, for her exemplary life of faith.  “Precious in the sight of the Lord is the death of his saints.” 

James M Fraser, Chairman
Andy Bannister, Director

We commend to you The Servant Queen and The King She Serves, published by the Bible Society in 2016.

PEP Talk Podcast With Natasha Moore

All the way from Australia, today Andy speaks with Natasha Moore on PEP Talk. Both there and here in the UK, there are similar needs to speak into our changing cultures, whilst retaining the winsomeness and grace that remains attractive whether we have a public platform or a private conversation.

With Natasha Moore PEP Talk

Our Guest

Natasha Moore is a Senior Research Fellow at the Centre for Public Christianity. She has a PhD in English Literature from the University of Cambridge and is the author of For the Love of God: How the church is better and worse than you ever imagined and, most recently, The Pleasures of Pessimism. She has worked for CPX since 2014 and written on topics that include books, movies, politics, food, domestic violence, Scripture in schools, war, Thanksgiving, and freedom of speech.

About PEP Talk

The Persuasive Evangelism Podcast aims to equip listeners to share their faith more effectively in a sceptical world. Each episode, Andy Bannister (Solas) and Kristi Mair (Oak Hill College) chat to a guest who has a great story, a useful resource, or some other expertise that helps equip you to talk persuasively, winsomely, and engagingly with your friends, colleagues and neighbours about Jesus.

Burning Questions

Burning Questions is a six-part video series exploring the greatest questions of life, God, faith and humanity – which Andy Bannister developed a few years ago. To mark its revamp and re-release, our friends at Talon Productions are offering readers of the Solas website the opportunity to get a significant discount on the purchase price. Read-on for details!

 

Each 45-minute programme can be watched individually, or used for a group-study using the accompanying study guide.

In each video, a young-looking Andy Bannister interviews significant people with a range of views; Christians, Atheists, Muslims, Jews, Hindus, Agnostics and more – to compare their views on things such as the existence and nature of God, the problem of evil, and who was Jesus. It’s a highly quality production, which is accessible for audiences with or without faith – who are open to a robust discussion about these ideas. Having said that, it probably won’t appeal to people who do not want their thinking challenged, or to hear viewpoints with which they disagree! Anyone who is willing to ‘follow the evidence where it leads’ will gain a huge amount from this enjoyable series.

Here’s the trailer for episode one!

The opening episode examines the existence of God. Professor Peter Atkins – the atheist scientist leads the charge against belief, and a range of people from different faiths respond. In Episode Two, the issue up for debate is “God and Science” – with the claim that science has made faith redundant, put under the microscope. That leads into the fact that belief in God always leads to discussion pf the problem of evil. If He exists, why is the world as it is? In Episode Three “Why do bad things happen to good people?” is debated. Then in Episode Four, religious pluralism is faced – because if people are spiritually hungry, how can they decide what to believe or what is actually true. is there any way of knowing which beliefs are actually true? The Fifth Episode focuses specifically on Christianity and whether the Bible can be trusted, while the Sixth and final episode looks at Jesus Christ himself.

The Burning Questions series is available to download from https://burningquestions.ca/ . To get the Solas readers’ discount, type the code SolasBQ2208 into the space marked “Coupon” at the checkout. The full price for the series is $24.99 (USD), and the discount will reduce that by $5. The accompanying study guide is a free download, which you can access here. This takes all the work out of making a series of videos into an easily useable resource for group discussion. If anyone enjoyed “Exploring The God Question”, https://www.solas-cpc.org/exploring-the-god-question-review/ DVD series which looked at God and Science, they will appreciate “The Burning Question” – which broadens the discussion from science out into questions of culture, value, purpose, hope, meaning and Jesus.

Confident Christianity Belfast

 

It took a lot of planning, and a Covid-related delay in the middle, but we finally managed to bring our Confident Christianity conference to Belfast in conjunction with our hosts Stranmillis Evangelical Presbyterian Church. The aim of the conference is to encourage, inspire and equip Christians to share their faith more naturally, confidently and winsomely with their non-Christian friends, family and colleagues.

John Roger from Stranmillis EPC kicked the day off with a devotional message from John 1, about how Peter became a follower of Jesus. The answer is that he was introduced to The Lord by Andrew, and that what we call ‘evangelism’ is doing that for others.

Andy Bannister spoke about sharing your faith without getting fired, and Andy  Moore looked at evangelism in a post-Covid context. Solas’s Gareth Black then looked at the objection that religion is part of what is wrong with the world, and how we might answer that. After lunch, Andy Moore looked at trusting God in troubled times, and Gareth at answering the objection that ‘the God of the Old Testament is a Moral Monster’ before Andy Bannister delivered the final talk on the uniqueness of Jesus. As usual Solas conferences always feature Q&A – an opportunty to interact with the speakers and their ideas.

The Confident Christianity conference can be a helpful tool for mobilising churches in evangelism – and we lovetaking it to different locations around the UK. We have a great team of speakers with a range of expertise in different fields who can help churches to address the particular challenges and opportuntiies for the gospel in their context. If you’d like to find out how a Confident Christianty conference could be held in your town or city, please hit the ‘Connect’ button above and send us a message! We’d love to bring this really helpful event to you!

Here are some photos from the Belfast conference:

Why Do Our Lives Need Purpose?

Have you ever wondered if your life has any purpose? Are you just a cosmic accident, whose life is ultimately purposeless, valueless, and meaningless? (Which would be the conclusion if atheism is true)? Or could it be that you were created for a purpose—and if so, what might it be?

Share

Please share this video widely with friends or family and for more Short Answers videos, visit solas-cpc.org/shortanswers/, subscribe to our YouTube channel or visit us on Twitter Instagram or Facebook.

Support

Short Answers is a viewer-supported video series: if you enjoy them, please help us continue to make them by donating to Solas. Visit our Donate page and choose “Digital Media Fund” under the Campaign/Appeal button.

Have You Ever Wondered if You Were Created For A Purpose?

Have you ever wondered if you were created for a purpose?  You probably have if you’ve ever complained about feeling bored or demotivated.

Novelist Mark Twain once said: “The two most important days in your life are the day you are born and the day you find out why”.  But is purpose and meaning in life something we can discover, or is it something we have to invent for ourselves?

Fundamentally, this is a religious and spiritual question, because it forces us to consider: what is the ultimate nature of reality?  There are two families of faith that offer different answers to the question:

  • Everything has arisen from nothing by no one for no purpose. This is the worldview of secular humanism and atheist existentialism.  Its answer to the meaning question is that it is something we must determine and create for ourselves.
  • Everything was created from nothing by Someone with a purpose. This is the worldview of theism, most importantly Judaism and Christianity.  Its answer to the meaning question is that it is something revealed to us by God our Creator.

Let’s compare and contrast them.

Most of us have grown up being taught that human beings are the products of evolution – we exist because of time, chance and natural selection.  Or as someone has said: “we are blobs of carbon, floating from one meaningless existence to another”.  That might sound a bit bleak, but for many people it is liberating and appealing.  You see according to the secular worldview there are no deities to please and no purpose to which you have to conform your life.  You are free!  We can all, in the words of Frank Sinatra, do life “my way”!

However, this worldview is not all freedom and fun.  For example, the philosopher Thomas Nagel admits that this worldview taken it to its logical conclusion is depressing and demotivating:

“Even if you produce a great work of literature which continues to be read thousands of years from now, eventually the solar system will cool or the universe will wind down and collapse and all trace of your effort will vanish…It wouldn’t matter if you had never existed.  And after you have gone out of existence, it won’t matter that you did exist”.

If this world and life is all that there is, then ultimately nothing matters!  In fact it doesn’t even matter whether you dedicate yourself to live a life of goodness and generosity helping others or a life of wickedness and selfishness that hurts others – in the end it is all meaningless!

How does that make you feel?  Empty… unfulfilled… hopeless?  Something feels wrong – we all need a sense of purpose and meaning to get out of our beds in the morning and to hold us back from suicidal thoughts.  So people have to invent an individual purpose for themselves.  For example: some people live for other people: their friends or families.  Some people live for personal success: through sporting or academic or workplace performance. Others dream of doing something that will make a meaningful impact on the world through business enterprise or political activism.

Nevertheless, these self-created meanings aren’t the full solution.  They are more fragile and less fulfilling.  Let me introduce you to two people who will explain why.

Firstly there’s Harold Abrams – the British athlete whose life is chronicled in the film “Chariots of Fire”.  At one point in the film, as he prepares for the next race, Abrams shares his existential angst: “And now in one hour’s time I will be out there again…I will raise my eyes and look down that corridor; 4 feet wide, with 10 lonely seconds to justify my whole existence. But WILL I?… I’m forever in pursuit and I don’t even know what I am chasing.”

Many of us today in our secular western society are a lot like Abrams – we’re running, chasing, pursuing something in this world that will justify and bring value to our existence.  However, if your created meaning depends on your performance then you will often be left feeling exhausted, insecure and anxious as you try to achieve it or try to hold onto it.

Interestingly, the film contrasts Abrams’ mindset with the Scottish Olympic gold medal winning athlete Eric Liddell.  Liddell was a Christian and he expresses his perspective on life and running in a conversation with his sister: “I believe God made me for a purpose, but he also made me fast. And when I run I feel His pleasure”.  His life was given meaning by the fact he knew he was running a greater race with a higher purpose from God.

I believe that Liddell points us towards a better answer.

The gospel of John – one of the four historical accounts of the life of Jesus – begins with these astonishing words:

“In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God and the Word was God.  He was in the beginning with God.  All things were created through Him…” (1:1-3)

John wrote in Greek and the term we translate as “the Word” was originally “the Logos”.  For centuries the greatest Greek thinkers had been searching for the Logos – the Logos was the logic behind life, the universe and everything.  If you could discover the Logos, then it would unlock the secrets of the meaning and purpose of life.

So John wants us to realise, that there is an objective meaning and purpose behind the universe.  It is not an impersonal principle to learn in philosophy, but a divine person to know in relationship.  That’s why he goes on to tell us: “The Word became flesh and made his dwelling among us and we have seen His glory…” (1:14) – he is claiming that the meaning of life is revealed in the person of Jesus Christ, the Son of the Living God!

God invites us back into relationship with Himself through trust in Jesus – and promises within that relationship we will find and fulfill our greatest purpose and potential.

PEP Talk Podcast With Graham Alder

Here at Solas we love hearing about how Christians are living out their faith and sharing it creatively in all kinds of contexts. Today we hear from a policeman about the particular challenges and opportunities he finds in his line of work. 

With Graham Alder PEP Talk

Our Guest

Graham Alder is a Police Sergeant and Christian Police Association Scotland Branch Leader & Trustee. He has over 18 years Police service in a variety of roles and locations.  Blessed with a wonderful wife and children, a keen musician and late comer to enjoying books, mainly on apologetics and church history.

Christian Police Association UK
CPA Scotland Facebook page

About PEP Talk

The Persuasive Evangelism Podcast aims to equip listeners to share their faith more effectively in a sceptical world. Each episode, Andy Bannister (Solas) and Kristi Mair (Oak Hill College) chat to a guest who has a great story, a useful resource, or some other expertise that helps equip you to talk persuasively, winsomely, and engagingly with your friends, colleagues and neighbours about Jesus.

Book Review: Of Popes and Unicorns by Dave Hutchings and James C. Ungureanu

Of Popes and Unicorns: Science, Christianity, and How the Conflict Thesis Fooled the World

As someone who has spent his career working in science and has been a Christian all his adult life, I have never really understood people who think that there is a conflict between science and religious belief.  If I did feel the strength of what is commonly called ‘the conflict thesis’ I should presumably have spent most of the last 35 years wrecked by existential angst about my inability to link up two irreconcilable halves of my life.

Of course, it is wholly possible that I am so dim-witted that I can’t actually perceive the conflict which is so obvious to everyone else. But at the risk of sounding pompous I’ve always rather doubted that. I am widely regarded as being dim-witted, but not quite so dim-witted as that.

At the foundation of the modern conflict thesis sits two books. John William Draper’s 1874  A History of the Conflict Between Religion and Science and Andrew Dickson White’s two volume 1896 A History of the Warfare of Science with Theology in Christendom. When published these books were influential, widely read, and are the root of a number of commonly held beliefs about the interaction between science and religion. In Of Popes and Unicorns David Hutching and James Ungureanu give us brief biographies of Draper and White before diving into their books to test their assertions. They do a thorough, readable, and at times very witty, job of dismantling the conflict thesis, showing that many of Draper and White’s historical arguments are not just muddle headed or over-simplifications but rather are based on falsehoods and evidence that simply isn’t there.

The problem, as Hutching and Ungureanu make clear, is that some of Draper and White’s lame nineteenth century arguments are still alive and kicking in the twenty-first. And this despite the best efforts of modern historians of science to set the record straight.

To give just one example of this, in chapter 4 entitled Walnuts for Brains, the authors note that Andrew White asserts that from the twelve hundreds the church banned human dissection. This was because of the thirteenth century ecclesiastical maxim ‘the Church abhors the shedding of blood’. Pope Boniface VIII banned the separation of flesh from the bones of the dead which rapidly became interpreted as a ban on dissection or surgery of any kind.

If it were true, it would be a terrible example of how the church held back progress by power and nonsense. Unfortunately for ‘the conflict thesis’ it isn’t true. There is no earlier source of the ‘the Church abhors the shedding of blood’ than the eighteenth century and while it seems that there were what Hutchings and Ungureanu describe as ‘a small number of folk’ (p.89) who did indeed read Boniface’s ban on the separation of flesh and bones as applying to human dissection, there is no record of the church preventing dissections.

They quote the contemporary historian of medicine Andrew Cunningham to seal the point: ‘As a life-long evangelical atheist I certainly hold no brief for the Catholic Church. Nevertheless the fact is that the Catholic Church has never been opposed to the practise of anatomy, whether for post-mortem demonstrating teaching or research purposes. Never, ever, anywhere’ (p.89).

Alas, despite the categorical ‘never, ever, anywhere’ the myth of opposition propagated by White is still alive and well, with Hutching and Ungureanu quoting, amongst other examples, a BBC Bitesize  GCSE History webpage which stated ‘Causes of medical stagnation in the Middle Ages included the forbidding of the Church of dissection and its encouragement of prayer (and superstition).’ Thankfully it has since been corrected, but it is pointed example of how historical fiction manages to persist.

Of Popes and Unicorns is well stocked with similar (if you will forgive the word) dissections of Draper and White’s alleged conflicts. The stories that Christendom held back scientific progress for a thousand years during the ‘dark ages’; or that the pope excommunicated a comet; or that Giordano Bruno (1548-1600) was burned at the stake for his scientific views; or that the church taught that the earth was flat, are all considered.

In some cases there are grains of truth in the myths. For example, Bruno was indeed burned at the stake, though for theological rather than scientific heresy. Admittedly burning people at the stake for theological reasons doesn’t reflect that well on the sixteenth century church anymore than burning people at the stake for scientific reasons, but at least we should get the reasons right. On the flat earth ‘conflict’, there were indeed a grand total of two theologians, Lactantius in the third century, and Cosmas in the sixth, who thought that the earth was flat. But pretty much no one took them seriously in their own lifetimes, or since, making it a little bit difficult to build a case that lots of people, never mind the entire church, thought, or taught, that the earth was flat.

The ‘conflict thesis’ has long been discarded as inadequate scholarship. In some historical instances it is just plain false, in others it does not do justice to the complexity of the history involved. This is all well known among academic historians of science, but David Hutchings and James Ungureanu have done a very good job of making the facts page-turningly-accessible to a wider audience.

Mark McCartney teaches mathematics at Ulster University

Of Popes and Unicorns: Science, Christianity, and How the Conflict Thesis Fooled the World, by David Hutchings & James C. Ungureanu, OUP, 2022, 263 pages. Is available here.

Confident Christianity in Grantown on Spey

Hope Church Aviemore were our hosts for a half-day Confident Christianity conference  held at the YMCA Community Centre in Grantown on Spey. There’s a sign on the wall there that says that ernest Shackleton once adressed audiences there, so Andy Bannister has now walked in the footsteps of the great Antarctic explorer! It’s a small, but charming venue which was a perfect location for an event up in Speyside.

 

As ever, these conferences are about encouraging Christians in their evangelism. Mike Causey from the church – who had planned and organised the event welcomed everyone, before Hope Church’s pastor Kenny Rogan brought an opening devotion about our reliance on the Holy Spirit for evangelism and apologetics to bear fruit. Andy then shared his “How to talk about Jesus” talk on conversational evangelism. Gavin Matthews spoke next, opening Ephesians 2:1-10 looking at the heart of the gospel, “But because of his great love for us, God, who is rich in mercy,  made us alive with Christ even when we were dead in transgressions—it is by grace you have been saved.” After a coffee break and brief slot about Solas’s ministry, Andy spoke on “Is Christianity Bad for the Environment” – addressing an important topic – but also demonstrating how the gospel can be shared through a contemporary issue. We finsihed off with an interesting time of Q&A which delved into eshcatology, Islam, heaven, the failures of the church, and witnessing to the apathetic.

Our host Mike Causey wrote:

“Welcoming Solas to Grantown was a joy. The desire to bring together believers from across the Spey Valley was realised in an impactful way. Not only did we hear practical guidance on sharing our faith in Jesus, we also connected with believers from multiple churches who hadn’t previously known of each other, even though they were in the same town. As a result, new opportunities to pray together are already arising, as well as a sense of a co-labouring for the gospel in our beautiful part of Scotland. Hope Church Aviemore is already planning its next Solas visit!”

Is Christianity the White Man’s Religion?

Whether it is the modern-day tragedy of George Floyd or the contested historical figure of Edward Colston, the legacy of the Trans-Atlantic slave trade is very much a live issue today. For today’s black and other minority communities, the religious justification of African slavery leaves many writing off Christianity as the tool of white oppression. But is Christianity really the “white man’s religion”? Clare Williams gives us three great reasons to think otherwise.

About Clare Williams: https://realquestions.co.uk/about

Share

Please share this video widely with friends or family and for more Short Answers videos, visit solas-cpc.org/shortanswers/, subscribe to our YouTube channel or visit us on Twitter Instagram or Facebook.

Support

Short Answers is a viewer-supported video series: if you enjoy them, please help us continue to make them by donating to Solas. Visit our Donate page and choose “Digital Media Fund” under the Campaign/Appeal button.