"A War of Loves": In Conversation with David Bennett

Gavin Matthews spoke to David Bennett, author of the remarkable book, A War of Loves

51IREvl4iwL._SX330_BO1,204,203,200_
SOLAS: So your book is out now?
DB: Yes, released on Thursday the 29th November in the UK, and then mid-December in Australia, but it was out on November 3th in the States. *Purchase your copy at our 10ofThose partner page.*
SOLAS: So has this book been brewing for a long time?
DB: The plan for the book started a year and a half ago when I was with my friend, the late Nabeel Qureshi. He’d written Seeking Allah, Finding Jesus and there was something profound about that book in the way it wove-together story and apologetics. I thought that we really needed a book like that which connects arguments for the scriptural view of human sexuality with a real story, and I had that story. So, I saw the huge value of pairing those two things together. I sense that a lot of people are trying to ‘box’ my book in, but I really hope that people will lay their ‘bug-bears’ down and actually consider the story and what has actually happened in my life.
I had just finished writing my book and was reading the manuscript in a coffee shop, sitting opposite a young girl who was a chain-smoking atheist, a very forthright interesting individual. We got chatting and she said, “I completely disagree with you being celibate, I think it’s ridiculous. But I respect you, and I’d like you to read your book to me!” And after reading the book, she said, “I not only understand why you are celibate”, but also “How do I become a Christian?” Which was amazing, and that’s really the reason I wrote the book!
SOLAS: Your book is part autobiography, part theology — an interesting mixture of different things going on.
image1DB: So the book is trying to bridge the gap between the subjective and the objective, the theological and the personal. I think the question of human sexuality and desire is a profound one to our personhood, in our bodies and in the world. It really requires a different approach than just a statement of belief, it’s something which requires an incarnational, as much as a scriptural response. My book doesn’t say “here’s what scripture says – now go live it”, it says, “here’s what scripture says, this is how I as a human being have lived it.” I think that is so important for gay people that this question doesn’t remain abstract but comes down and dwells with them and relates to them. That’s what I needed when I was going through my own questioning. So I want the book to make people feel that they have ‘company’ and draw them towards intimacy with God. At the very centre of the book is the question, “have you experienced the love of God?”. I really don’t think that the question of who we are, including our sexuality is really answerable until we have experienced the love of God in Jesus. I don’t think you can understand the Christian ethic without knowing Christ. So I wrote this primarily as an invitation to embrace the love of God.
I’m not really celibate today because I’m gay (although that’s part of it). You know, recently, the Lord said to me, “You are celibate, because I’m worthy of that.” This is actually an invitation to worship and to realise how worthy God is. It’s in losing yourself in God that you find yourself and that is the ‘heart-cry’ of the book.
SOLAS: And there’s enough in the autobiographical side of the book to upset those on the more liberal side of the equation and enough in the theology to upset the more fundamentalist… so I suppose there’s enough to upset almost everybody!
DB: That sounds like somebody I know … Jesus!!! I mean, Jesus agreed with the conservatives, with his views on divorce and resurrection but he didn’t agree with the way they lived out the law. He saw that it was hollow, and he reinstated the life of faith, which is living in the dynamic of relationship with Father-God in the Spirit. Jesus steered us back to that relationship in which the moral life actually makes sense and works. I want to walk to the ‘narrow’ Jesus path, and I’m willing to pay a price.
SOLAS: John’s gospel describes Jesus as “full of grace and truth” but sometimes it seems that the Church is always trying to compromise on one of those things or the other — but you seem to be trying to go all out of BOTH grace and truth!
DB: Yes! And how can we claim to worship Messiah-Jesus and not do that? I don’t understand how people think that truth alone will get people there, and I don’t understand how people want to water down grace and make it ‘fluffy’; it’s an insult to his cross. When people ‘watered down’ truth to me, they thought they were loving me, but they weren’t. When people watered-down grace, they weren’t loving me, they were just making it easier for their flesh to feel comfortable with the fact that I was gay. That doesn’t come from God. Whenever a person acts from the love of God, even if they are rebuking you or correcting you, it will always bring life and encourage you to go deeper with the Lord. I hope that in this sexuality conversation, Jesus will be imitated in the church.
SOLAS: Your book is very open, very personal. Were you ever tempted to hide, to just live out your beliefs quietly, rather than publicly?
DB: I deeply disagree with the lack of vulnerability in Christian ministry platforms and the way the Christian world works. There’s a kind of personal authenticity, that I absolutely love about the gay-community and I miss desperately in the Christian community. It’s ironic because I say in the book that I felt a lack of intimacy when I was in various spaces in the gay world. I also have felt more recently a lack of capacity for Christians to have intimacy with one another and be real and honest and authentic; because of the fear of being judged or losing a platform. I am trying to break that and say that the only way to minister Christ to the world is through our weaknesses, vulnerabilities and personal failures. It’s in that space that the glory of God is seen. I think that it is really important to be personally vulnerable and that’s why I put my head above the parapet. Jesus himself, and Paul and the greats of the faith all put their head above the parapet at the appointed time. I feel that God has given me this opportunity with my story. It is scary, and there are times when I think that people will reject me or come after me. I always worry that there will be those people who are just determined to hate, and don’t want to hear what you have to say, or just pre-judge the book from the cover. But my prayer is that people will read the book, allow it to touch them, and that God will speak to them through it. And it’s worth taking that risk, I think.
SOLAS: You got NT Wright to write the foreword! I remember hearing him once say that wherever Paul preached there were riots and people tried to kill him; but wherever he preaches people serve cups of tea! So what kinds of reactions have you had to the book?
DB: Well I had one very unfortunate reaction on Twitter saying that my book would kill people. But that person then apologised and said that they hadn’t actually read it! But that’s probably the kind of reaction you get from someone who had been hurt by the church. However, it’s unfair to judge my book without understanding who I am or my story. My book is far more complex, gritty and real than some clichéd ex-gay narrative. People see “he was a gay-activist who discovered Jesus”. But you have to understand I was an atheist gay-activist! I wasn’t a Christian, in fact I hated Christianity. I was expecting that there would be a backlash but 99% of feedback has been really positive, and lots of people have said that we really need this book for the church and for the gospel. Some have said thank you for being vulnerable. New Christians have picked up the book and said, ‘this is exactly what I needed, God has led me to your book’ sometimes from people living silently in the closet who feel freed by the book. So it’s amazing to see the stories of people who have been transformed by God through it, and I’m humble grateful to God for that. A War of Loves is not a perfect doctrinal statement either. That might follow after I have completed my theological studies, and have more life experience, I’m only 29!
SOLAS: So, tell me about the title: A War of Loves?
DB: I was trying to come up with a title that really summarised the book . An atheist gay-activist has this crazy encounter with God in a pub, and then wakes up the next day! What is that like…?!
SOLAS: I have no idea!!
DB: Not many people have had that experience! I remember saying to God, “I’m an atheist gay activist, I can’t be a Christian!” So it was a war. Who would I stand for, Jesus, or that? The war in me was huge. Do I trust God or don’t I? It got to a point where the evidential threshold was crossed, and I had to follow Christ. But then there was a war for three years about what I did with my sexuality and my romantic life.
But this isn’t just a matter for people who are gay. There is the matter for everyone, with our will and the will of God. Jesus prayed in Gethsemane “not my will but yours be done” which is a war of loves and is the centre of my doctoral thesis. It’s a human struggle that we all have to do the will of God and not our own; including the wrestling of a gay, same-sex attracted person to be a Christian. There is a huge difference between having a desire, the goal or aim of which will never be fulfilled and has to die; compared to a heterosexual desire which could be sanctified in a marriage. When you are same-sex attracted/gay that’s hard, and I hope that’s something that people pick up in the book, that this “War of Loves” is a struggle to follow Christ and to let the war of loves be won. It’s won by God’s love winning over false, idolatrous views of love.
SOLAS: Does that not thrust a spear at the heart of what has gone wrong with Christianity in the West, that we have marketed it like a life-enhancement product for self-fulfilment, rather than looking Christ-like and sacrificial? And that the sort of cost you describe should be the normal Christian life?
DB: I totally agree, and the fascinating thing is being same-sex attracted and gay is secretly a blessing in disguise because I don’t have the option of lukewarm life-enhancement Christianity that is a hobby on Sunday. I literally don’t have that option. I want to say to the church, “Put your idolatry away where it came from. You can’t get away with it, there are people you are actually hurting by not living the full Christian life!” The fact that there aren’t many celibate heterosexual people is a sign that there is an idolatry of romantic love in the church. A young gay man in the book said, “Why can’t we have romantic love? They get to have romantic love and family and kids, and we don’t. How could God be good if that’s real?” And I said, Praise be to God that we have these desires because if we didn’t, we’d sign up to that idolatry and we wouldn’t follow His will. So it is a blessing in that particular sense that we don’t have that option – we have to go for celibacy. It actually forces your hand into a Christian asceticism as there is no other way through for a gay/same sex attracted person.
It’s the same for a heterosexual person, but because of our culture, you can kind of get away with it. I’m hoping that there’s an edge to the book that calls the church to repentance in this area.
SOLAS: I wonder if the church is uncomfortable with your message of high-cost, real discipleship?
DB: I understand that following Jesus isn’t easy and requires a lot of grace to take the step to carry your cross. In my life the people who have blessed me the most have been those loving, stable, Jesus-loving truth-embracing voices who have confronted me or who have sat with me in hard truths I need to accept. So, I wouldn’t want to do anything less for others.
I have had so many responses from people who are not LGBTQI, who have said to me, ‘this book is really helping me in my marriage’ or ‘in my family life’ to actually re-order my loves around God. I hope that this book is doing good work for the Lord’s purposes.
That’s why the stories of gay/same sex attracted people who are living obediently to Christ need to be shared more in the church because they have a prophetic weight. There’s a risk for the church to let them be heard, but I actually think that that God will bless though it. We need more testimonies of people who have come to embrace Jesus’ ethic of sexuality.
There are people arguing that the male-female created order of God doesn’t matter, that we have this new thing in Jesus and that gay-marriage is wonderful in the church. I think that that is such a betrayal of Jesus. He is the creator-incarnate and He made us male and female for a reason. Just deleting that is just impossible. You can’t worship Him as God and delete male and female marriage: that just doesn’t work. So gay marriage will never be at the centre of the church of Jesus. There will only be marriage as God originally intended it, and that’s not even the point in God’s Kingdom. Jesus said there will be no marriage in the future. So God has ratified the created order through Jesus. However, He will transform it in the future into something into which we all have access, are all invited. Of course, people who are celibate are almost starting heaven now! In the sense that they are embodying what the future will be like.
SOLAS: You talk about the difference between “good celibacy” and “bad celibacy”.. is that part of what you mean by “good celibacy”, pre-empting the future in the Kingdom of God?
DB: Exactly! Sarah Coakley’s book A New Asceticism has been a real blessing to me. It’s very careful thinking. She herself is pro-gay relationships in the church, and I completely disagree with that, but I do think that her model of what Christian asceticism looks like is brilliant. The future-orientated vocation of celibacy, is an admirable and honourable Christian vocation. Marriage obviously points to the future as well.
Of course, everyone is invited to be married in Christ! The real marriage we are actually celebrating is the future marriage of Jesus and the bride. Marriage between a man and a woman, or celibacy both celebrate that. In celibacy there is a deep, intense Christian friendship you can experience such as between David and Jonathan, and other biblical characters too. I’m really interested in seeing the church removing the idol of sexuality and experiencing those kind of friendships. I think they are a radical witness to the world, just as a beautiful Christian marriage is.
SOLAS: Our culture exalts sex to a very high place and will misunderstand some of what you are saying as a choice between sexual activity and misery … but you are a joyful person! What is the source of your joy?
DB: I don’t think people realise that God is actually real! I’m not giving my sexuality up merely for an idea! He’s actually real, Jesus is the Messiah, he actually rose from the dead! He rose, and it’s true. Jesus rose from the dead, I have no doubt about it. I have experienced too many of its effects to ever believe otherwise.
God has designs, desires and goals for our bodies and following them is a deep act of worship. Failing to do that is sinning, falling short of the intention He has for your body. That is a pretty big thing, but scripture is so clear that our bodies are not our own.
God’s love actually changes our hearts and desires that fit with His will and purpose though. That has happened with my same-sex desires. I don’t want a gay marriage, or a gay relationship anymore. I want to be completely with God and serve His kingdom. That’s taken a long time, ten years, and there’s been moments where of course I’ve wanted that, but overall you change over time. Once you have ‘tasted’ God, known His presence, you are given a new desire-life which is not orientated around the ‘old man’, but which desires the heavenly future.
Christian joy is so amazing. I am addicted to the joy of God. I think Christian joy is ultimately about union with God, knowing this incredible joy that He has about who we are, or what the creation will be like when it’s finally finished and we can rest in eternal intimacy with Him. And there’s nothing like that. The Bible states that ‘Jesus endured the cross for the joy set before him’, and in some sense I know I’m going to suffer but I’ve got this joy set before me …. Christ! It’s hard to describe what it looks like; but I would say that it looks like a human being, fully alive! Which doesn’t require sex, it’s completely independent of sex. Christian joy is more than happiness, and comes through suffering too. That’s a really interesting mystery in the Christian life. The people who have the greatest Christian joy that I’ve seen, are those who have suffered the most.
SOLAS: Thanks for your time, David!
DB: Pleasure. And God bless you!

Christmas Adverts: Some Gifts Are More Than Just a Gift

by Sarah Allen

I’m writing this in the first week of December, but the battle of the ads started a few weeks ago.  Much anticipated, compared and dissected in the press, these adverts from the major retailers have become a tradition over the last fifteen years.  And I guess they do their job, raising the profile of the companies concerned and presenting them as beneficent, family friendly, cheer-bringing organisations – helping us to forget for a month or so that they are really consumption-creating giants battling each other for the contents of our purses.
As Christians who know that Christmas is about the extraordinary, awe-inspiring, dazzlingly beautiful miracle of the incarnation, it would be tempting to despise these ads.  They are often manipulative and cynical sickly-sweet confections, after all.  They promote idolatry of the family and of consumption and gloss over the pain that is so much a part of many peoples’ Christmases.  But maybe we should not condemn too quickly or switch off from their effects; after all these adverts showcase the aspirations and values of our nation.  They are a picture of the yearnings that we all share.

JL1
Used with permission of John Lewis & Partners

Take, for example, the John Lewis advert which tells backwards the career of Elton John, ending in a Christmas gift of a piano.  The origin of his success, we are told, was the generous gift of loving parents, and throughout his famous “Your Song” plays with its refrain, “how wonderful life is, when you’re in the world”.  Parental love and giving are elevated together. 
This sentimentality is really cleverly undercut by the advert from their partner store, Waitrose, in which a teenage daughter attempts to show her parents this John Lewis advert, but they keep fast forwarding it because they want some cake; it seems we can choose – buy into to the schmaltz or laugh at it, either way, family is centre stage.  The same message is there in the 2018 Boots ad; which tells the story of the reconciliation of a teenage daughter and mum.  The BBC too have run their own ad-like narrative showing a working mum walking away from her demanding job to have fun with her son.  And Sainsburys, whose ad seems to have been the most popular so far, featured a mum putting away her phone to watch her daughter’s starring role in a primary school extravaganza.

jl5
Used with permission of John Lewis & Partners

I could go on, but I think the central message is clear.  These are more like religious tracts than traditional adverts.  They call the watcher to repentance and worship and change with their message that family is more important than work, or technology or superficial disputes.  Unconditional love is at the heart of family, they say, and this love liberates.  So, show this love, presumably by buying stuff.
We might agree with a lot of this — Christians think that the family is important and that we should be generous to each other.  But we know as well that the nuclear family, however materially comfortable, cannot provide us with the love we really need.  And the most peaceful, loving family can still be riven with patterns of sin.  The best parents cannot sacrifice enough to bring their kids round.  If the family is where we turn to for salvation, then we will be left full of guilt and shame, trapped into giving (or buying?) more and more and more.
But the religious yearnings of these ads can also point us to a greater reality.  Isn’t our family relationship with our Father in Heaven, and through His Son, with our brothers and sisters on earth, more valuable than anything else?  Wouldn’t you agree that His love is liberating and accepting and generous.  And don’t the undeserved gifts of forgiveness and the outpouring of His Holy Spirit transform lives?  The desire expressed in these ads finds its answer and end in the gospel.

jl6
“Some gifts are more than just a gift”      Used with permission of John Lewis & Partners

 

Are We Matter or Do We Matter?

What is a human being? Are we just a collection of atoms and particles? Or merely the result of time, chance and natural selection? Or are we, in the words of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, people with inherent dignity? In the latest SHORT/ANSWERS video, Andy Bannister explores why what you believe about God has a huge impact on what you believe about human beings — and about how we treat those around us.

 

Share SHORT ANSWERS on social media

Please share this video widely with friends or family and for more SHORTANSWERS videos, visit https://www.solas-cpc.org/shortanswers/ or subscribe to our channel.
 


Support us on Patreon

SHORTANSWERS is a viewer-supported video series: if you enjoy them, please help us continue to make them: https://www.patreon.com/solas

Debating Atheists at St Andrews University: a fascinating exchange of views

Last month I had the privilege of speaking at a debate in St Andrews – I believe it was the first of this kind that the Christian Union have organised. I loved it. The place was relatively full, the chairman was excellent and my opponent, Dr Manfredi La Manna, reader of Economics at University of St Andrews, was pleasant, affable and spoke well.

Dr La Manna

However, I found his arguments quite astonishing. He wanted to go further than Christianity being a delusion – he wanted to call it the greatest fraud. He argued that there were seven problems with Christianity which made it false.

    1. Christianity had come in credulous times

 

    1. Christianity had occurred just in the one place

 

    1. Christianity used a book in an age of illiterate people

 

    1. Christianity created a caste of priests

 

    1. In order to be true, Christianity had to be permanent (he later qualified this to mean that the evidence had to be permanent)

 

    1. The Bible would have to be perfect

 

  1. Christianity would have to be beneficial to society.

As you can imagine, these were all a gift! I enjoyed responding to them after giving my own initial presentation. I wonder how you would have responded? Here is a brief summary of my counter-points.
1. We live in credulous times – therefore Christianity must be flourishing! There is no evidence that the 1st century was any more credulous than the 21st.
2. There is no reason logically why this should make Christianity untrue. By definition, the historical Christ could only come in one place. Christians are now all over the world.
3. We taught them to read because Christianity is about education. Without the Book then we are at the mercy of various religious gurus.
4. We created a priesthood of all believers.
5. Christianity is permanent. We are still here. And so is the evidence.
6. It is.
7. It is….the University of St Andrews would not have existed without Christianity.
There was of course much more than that. I thought the questions were excellent and in some cases very difficult (the usual ones on feminism, homosexuality and science). I loved being faced with these challenges and thought that the participation of the students was excellent.
Some arguments from Dr La Manna stuck out. He claimed that he would not believe something unless it was 99.99999% certain – which I pointed out meant that his own discipline, (economics), was redundant!
He also encouraged students to get an online Bible and google it for words and quotes. I suggested that St Andrews students, as intelligent human beings, would be far better off actually reading books rather than just googling for quotes!
screenshot-2018-11-07-at-17-52-29He tried to use mockery, putting up a couple of Bible verses as if they were self-evidently ridiculous. It’s hard to deal with those in a short space of time – but it can be done! (although I am not sure I did it well).
He also claimed that the Bible was written by seven-year-olds – although he apologised for that to me afterwards – not least because it did not help his case!
The final lesson for me was the amount of harm that liberal theologians do. I think Dr La Manna struggled a bit because he was surprised to find that I actually believed the Bible. He suggested that ‘scholars’ thought otherwise – but did not cite any (although there are plenty).
Overall, I loved the evening and thought it was very useful in terms of the gospel. Several students spoke to me afterwards, asking about Bible study, or my Magnificent Obsession book or asking more questions. Years after the event, the debates I did with Matt Dilahunty continue to produce fruit – one student told me that he had been an atheist but partly because of those debates (which he had listened to six times!) was now an agnostic.

Rev David Robertson (Co-founder and Speaker for Solas) is the minister of St Peter’s Free Church, Dundee. He blogs at www.theweeflea.com, where this article was first published.

Sorry, not sorry!

It seems that on at least a weekly basis some public figure says something regrettable, is publicly censured for their words, and issues an apology. Whether it is the sexist content of an after dinner speech, or an editorial piece which lapses into the old tropes of racism, it seems that people cannot help but put their foot in it, transgressing the few remaining moral boundaries that our society upholds and enforces. What is intriguing in all of this is not the fact of people saying offensive things (history is littered with such pronouncements), but the modern means of dealing with it: the issued apologies which are pinned to a Twitter feed, or fed to the press.
One such story in today’s news provides an excellent example. An individual by the name of Graffin Parke was asked to make an after dinner speech at Cooke Rugby Club in Belfast. Perhaps having forgotten that the past thirty years have elapsed, Mr Parke used this as an opportunity to air his saltiest anecdotes and most sexist one-liners. While the actual content of his speech has not been aired, the commendable reaction of Cooke Rugby Club in utterly denouncing his sentiments suggests that his words were highly inappropriate. Approached by the BBC, Mr Parke ‘apologised’ using words which must appear in some kind of manual for people who don’t really want to say sorry:

“The comments I made are not in any way a reflection of my true attitudes or beliefs.”

This is a slightly nuanced form of ‘sorry, not sorry’, an affirmation that the individual was in the room when mistakes were made, but that he or she cannot in any way claim ownership of them. This is the new way to apologise – be outrageous, speak malignantly and abusively, push the edges of gratuitousness, and then as the verbal bomb detonates deny that you really meant to plant it in the first place.
Such words are suggestive of a kind of dualism and are deeply postmodern in their assumptions. A man or woman can make every thinking individual within his audience squirm and fume, but ultimately when confronted can say that this is not really him or her, not authentically who they are, that their words are beautifully divorced from anything they value, think, or truly espouse. The questions then arise: what is this person’s attitude? what do they think? why did they say something diametrically opposed to their belief system? how did Mr Hyde make it into the room when Dr Jekyll is such a fine fellow deep down?
All of this would be laughable if its ubiquity weren’t so lamentable. It is not just misguided middle-aged men who indulge in this behaviour, in essence all of us do. We are excuse-making creatures, we externalise our words and actions, we deplore the symptoms while denying the cause, we will go to any lengths to make sure that we don’t actually own what we do or say, knowing all the while that to do anything else would show us who we are. We are snappy with those closest to us, we show impatience and selfish disregard for everyone else, and then we say that it was tiredness which made us do it (C.S. Lewis is surely right in saying that we never credit good sleep for our better behaviours); we indulge in appetites which destroy us and others and then attribute our weakness to some deeper need or absence. All of us board the train of self-justification, knowing that it is rumbling towards the cliff edge, but to disembark, to face ourselves, to own our behaviours would be painful beyond words.
For me the gospel of Jesus Christ is so helpful here. He tells us that it is ‘out of the overflow of the heart’ that ‘the mouth speaks’ (Matthew 12:34). Long before Freud formed his theories, Jesus blocked off our emergency exit, and demands that we see that our heart speaks whether we will it to or not, the corruption of who we are manifests itself, and nowhere more powerfully than in what we say. We will be held to account for our words, Jesus says, not just by the drooling mob on Twitter, but by Almighty God himself – what we say counts, and carries consequence far beyond our immediate discomfort at being called out. Those words are symptoms of the full anatomy of sin which we embody in our lives day by day – our words do show our attitudes and thoughts, they betray us and blab out our sinfulness in spite of our best attempts at moral finesse and respectability.
The gospel solution for this is deeply liberating too – repentant ownership, not just of our behaviour, or our demeanour, but of our sinful nature. The gospel liberates me to say that I am corrupt, that I am contorted and scheming and horribly compromised as a human being. The gospel allows me to say sorry, not just to the faceless crowd of our new speech-morality, but to the God whom I have offended. It allows me to say sorry securely because in Christ my sin has been dealt with and my forgiveness secured. This isn’t a luxury item owned only by those who come from a Christian background – Christ offers that opportunity to us all, to repent, to say this sin is mine and this sin is me, and to receive from him the transparently necessary forgiveness he died and rose to provide.


af4pZZsA_400x400Andrew Roycroft

is pastor of Millisle Baptist Church in Co. Down. N. Ireland, and blogs at www.thinkingpastorally.com

Why Can’t You Believe What You Want As Long As You’re Sincere?

In the latest Short Answers video Andy Bannister asks whether it matters what you believe as long as you believe it sincerely?

This video is used as part of the SU Scotland “Connect Groups Q&A” curriculum.

Share

Please share this video widely with friends or family and for more Short Answers videos, visit solas-cpc.org/shortanswers/, subscribe to our YouTube channel or visit us on Twitter Instagram or Facebook.

Support

Short Answers is a viewer-supported video series: if you enjoy them, please help us continue to make them by donating to Solas. Visit our Donate page and choose “Digital Media Fund” under the Campaign/Appeal button.

 

Exploring The God Question – Review

The relationship, or conflict, between scientific endeavour and religious belief is a topic about which many a book has been written, and many a debate been held. The Exploring the God Question video series is a resource which attempts to cater for an audience who might not be inclined to read a whole book, or might find a debate arid.
ETGQ Pack ShotAt its heart, Exploring the God Question has three DVDs, covering the three broad topics of ‘The Cosmos’, ‘Life and Evolution’ and ‘Mind and Consciousness’. Each topic is split into two roughly 30 minute programmes, and each programme is divided into between six and nine sections, all of which can be individually played from the main DVD menu. This allows the DVDs to be used to provide stand-alone 30-minute or one-hour presentations on a topic, or each section can be used as short discussion starters. The overall format is made up of segments of interviews linked by a narrator and interspersed with impressive visuals.
A real strength of the material is the range and stature of the voices included. To make the point, here are a selection: Denis Alexander, Peter Atkins, Francis Collins, William Lane Craig, Dan Dennett, Sam Harris, Christopher Hitchins, Steve Jones, John Lennox, Steven Pinker, John Polkinghorne, Michael Ruse, Lord Sacks, Keith Ward and Steven Weinberg. This, by any measure, is a line-up of some of the biggest names in science and religion. It ranges from the strident and uncompromising atheism of Peter Atkins, an Emeritus Professor of Chemistry at Oxford, to the philosophically adroit theism of William Lane Craig of Talbot School of Theology. The programmes move smoothly between interview segments with the various protagonists, and the two sides of the debate are, to my mind, fairly represented.
Those on the side of theism are drawn almost exclusively from Christianity (with Lord Sacks and the Muslim Usama Hasan being the only exceptions I noticed), but given the nature of the topic this makes little difference. The point at issue is primarily God’s existence, not His nature. That said, at the end of the third DVD, which deals with experience of God, the material becomes explicitly Christian in its perspective.
Life and Evolution.001Equally impressive as the line-up of interviewees is the scope of topics covered, and the willingness to take tough topics ‘head-on’. Thus, for example, the ‘Life and Evolution’ DVD includes dealing directly with the fact that suffering is ‘hard-wired’ into any theistic-evolutionary perspective. This point, sometimes skirted over by theists, moves the exegetical issues around the early chapters of Genesis from chapter 1 (the nature of the creative act) to chapter 3 (the consequences of the fall), and related issues of theodicy. I was also happy to see recent creationism being given a voice, not because I happen to agree with it, but rather because it is a view to be found within many evangelical churches, and stems from a genuine respect for the authority of Scripture.
Mind and Consciousness.001The ‘Mind and Consciousness’ DVD covers material which is becoming increasingly relevant, with the rise of Artificial Intelligence and allied questions about the nature of humanity. Nineteenth century concerns about Darwinism may have centred on the reduction of humanity to being no more than a the animal kingdom, but in the twenty-first century the issue is whether we are no more than very complex biological machines. If materialism is true then this is certainly the case. However, this brings in its wake a number of consequences, the most important of which are that free will is an illusion, and that morality is a social construction and no moral absolutes exist. The DVD deals with the question of morality, but also covers near death experiences, religious experience, and the nature of consciousness.
cosmos .001The DVD which dealt with material closest to my own area of expertise was ‘The Cosmos’, which covers the creation of the universe and the Big Bang, the elegance of the laws of physics, and various aspects of the ‘fine tuning’ of the universe. These are well covered, and to me show the difference between atheism and theism at its most stark. For the theist ‘the heavens declare the glory of God’ (Psalm 19). For the atheist ‘it’s really just chance’ (Steven Weinberg, Nobel Prize for Physics, 1979). Using the polite discourse of the academy I would say I find Weinberg’s view ‘deeply unsatisfying’. Using the somewhat more direct level of discourse of my local coffee shop I would say that if you are asking me to believe that the whole physical universe, its laws and allied complexity, came into existence out of nothing and ‘it’s really just chance’, then sorry, I just don’t have enough ‘faith’ to be an atheist.
The accompanying Study Guide gives a set of broad questions to accompany each programme as well as more detailed questions based on quotes from the various interviewees. There are also a number of appendices which, among other things, contain definitions of various technical terms which occur in the DVDs and summaries of the cases for both theism and atheism. Finally, the Leader’s Manual gives helpful overviews of the programmes and sensible suggestions on how to lead group discussions.
In summary, this is an excellent resource which would be valuable in the RME or science classroom in school, Christian Unions in universities, or in youth or apologetics groups in churches. The DVD material can be used in short ‘bite-sized’ chunks of a few minutes, or longer half or full hour formats, making it very flexible. It manages to cover a very wide range of topics and perspectives within the broad area of science and religion, and it does so, in the main, very well indeed.

3 DVDs (total running time approx. 3 hrs), Kharis Productions Ltd, 2013
Study Guide (82pp), Leaders Manual (70pp) by Iain Morris, Pub. Search for Truth Enterprises, 2013

http://www.thegodquestion.tv/

Mark McCartney lectures in Mathematics at the University of Ulster

"The Big Conversation": Andy Bannister talks to Peter Singer

 “Evolution, morality and being human: Do we need God to be good?”

In the latest of episode of “The Big Conversation”, Solas’ Director, Andy Bannister spoke to the acclaimed atheist philosopher Peter Singer while host Justin Brierley chaired the discussion. Under the title, “Evolution, Morality and Being Human: Do We Need God?“, the two thinkers engaged in a polite, respectful and very revealing debate in which they were able to air their respective Christian and Utilitarian world-views and have them examined. What made the programme so constructive was that both Peter and Andy listened to one another, and rather than throwing slogans at one another, engaged with one another’s ideas. As such the full implications of Andy Bannister’s Christian worldview and the Peter Singer’s Atheist-Utilitarianism are held up for scrutiny.

https://www.thebigconversation.show/doweneedgodtobegoodonversation/

The full debate is available in the clip above (1 hour 20 minutes.) Premier, who organised, filmed and broadcast the show, have also selected a few key clips from the programme which are below.

  1. Why Peter Singer disagrees with the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.

2. Should we euthanise severely disabled children?

3. Peter Singer argues that babies with Downs Syndrome should be aborted.

Many thanks to Justin Brierley and Premier for the film, clips, and photos.
IMG_0768 (2) - Copy
From left to right: Andy Bannister, Justin Brierley, & Peter Singer

Confident Christianity Conference Report

Dundee-Conference-Facebook-Event-Header-VADundee’s Central Baptist Church played host to around three hundred folks on November 3rd, who gathered to consider how to share the gospel in our age of tough questions, at this year’s Solas Conference. They came from all over Scotland, the North of England (and one from Wales!) to explore “Confident Christianity”.

Jim Turrent 'Unashamed'
Rev Jim Turrent

Jim Turrent, the pastor of Central Baptist welcomed everyone to Dundee and kicked proceedings off with a call for the church to embrace the Biblical call to unashamed gospel proclamation. He suggested that lack of confidence in the gospel is the main factor inhibiting the church’s effective witness to Christ today, and that the day’s theme was therefore urgent and pressing.

Dr Andy Bannister 'how to engage in helpful conversations about Jesus'
Dr Andy Bannister

In a session entitled, “How to talk about Jesus without sounding like an idiot”, Dr Andy Bannister examined the way in which Jesus in the gospels engaged with individuals, asking probing questions to reveal their motivation and beliefs. Andy commended the similar use of questions today, and gave examples of conversations he has had when “what makes you ask that?”, has opened up deeper, more fruitful conversations, than instant, sharp answers to initial questions. Likewise, presenting gospel perspectives can be eased into more naturally by asking people to consider, “have you ever considered that….?”, Andy argued.
This crash-course in personal evangelism was especially well received. One attendee. Ewan Cathcart, commented:

“I have enjoyed the conference very much indeed, in Dundee my hometown! I particularly enjoyed Andy, his style was terrific, and he dismantled a lot of things that are a problem in talking to other people. He put up some very useful suggestions of ways to do that, too”.

Dr Sharon Dirckx: “Questions of Science and Faith”

Sharon Dirckx holds a PhD in brain-imaging, and took the atheist materialist world-view to task by arguing that their view of humanity as merely a physical entity doesn’t just clash with Christian belief, but is poor science. Her first talk was entitled “Am I more than my brain?”, and examined the claims of atheists such as Sir Francis Crick, that humanity can be explained by (and reduced to) physical matter. Finding these views lacking, she provided some important pre-evangelism resources, especially for those involved in the physical sciences.
Andy Bannister’s second talk, “Am I matter, or do I matter?” applied this further, exploring our creation ‘in the image of God”. Here he looked at the ethical implications of materialism; and the way in which human rights and dignity require a grounding in a creator-God.

Dr Ben Thomas 'compelling testimony'
Dr Ben Thomas

Dr Ben Thomas gave two talks on sexual ethics during the day. The first was his testimony of conversion to Christ, when he was sharing his life with his same-sex partner. He explained that deep wrestling with scripture led him to conclude that this could not continue, and why he has chosen a single, celibate life. He described the way in which he longed to find liberal/progressive views of the Bible persuasive; but had to concede that they were not. In one particularly memorable phrase, he said that he was compelled by the case that only God could define love. He spoke with great warmth and clarity about the cost, but also the great joys of the Christian life.
His second talk addressed how to share the gospel, faithfully and winsomely with LBGT+ friends, family and colleagues. Emphasising that behavioural changes are a response to grace, not a way of earning it, Ben encouraged the conference to talk openly about Jesus with LGBT people in the same way as with anyone else. Noting 1 Corinthians 6, that ‘the unrighteous will not inherit the Kingdom of God’, he pointed out that the list of sins there includes homosexual practice, but also idolatry, drunkenness, greed and so forth; and that there is not a different gospel for different people! He also challenged the church about her love, acceptance, and full inclusion of single people; who can sometimes be made to feel like lesser-Christians. The fact that both the Lord Jesus and the Apostle Paul were unmarried, should be all the evidence we need that this is wrong.
Dr Mark Stirling examined contemporary culture, and ways in which secularism seeks to claim the public square as its own, the consequences of this, and how we might respond. Of particular significance was that we confront the secular-myth that they are neutral and value-free, while Christians come with an agenda. This cultural presumption is both untrue (secular humanism is a very particular belief-system) and controlling (it uses its presumed neutrality to exclude other views).

Dr Mark Stirling 'engaging the culture'
Dr Mark Stirling

He also spoke about sharing the gospel in an age when everyone takes offence, moving beyond hurling slogans, to a far deeper engagement. Illustrating the point from scripture and experience, he demonstrated that listening to people, developing deeper relationships, and being gracious and respectful is not in tension with apologetics; but essential for it.
He also warned the church in Scotland that we are ‘behind the curve’ in thinking deeply and profoundly about the cultural shifts around us, and that we need to pray and think hard, not regress to mere pragmatism. He commented afterwards: “I was offering some critique of the fact that as a church we have neglected a lot of the necessary hard work to understand culture, to engage with the ideas that are out there; and the failure to do so doesn’t make us more spiritual! It actually means that we are just less relevant and more marginalised. So part of my plea was that we do the necessary hard work which is both intellectual and spiritual. We must never let the academic and the practical be separated.”
Dr Sharon Dirckx brought the day to a conclusion with a talk about suffering. Weaving together national stories of suffering such as Grenfell Tower, with those of illness in her own family, Dr Dirckx examined elements of ‘the fall’, and probed towards the classic ‘freewill defence’. However, her final answer she said, was found in the gospel of Christ itself, and his promise of eternal life. Jesus Christ had entered time and space, and indeed embraced suffering in order not just to empathise with us, but to redeem us for all time. She encouraged people who had spent the day engaged in serious thinking, to ensure that they have trusted Christ themselves.
Q&A Panel
All the speakers were joined by Jim Turrent for a Q&A session during the afternoon. Questions written, texted or raised from the floor, included Jordan Peterson, same-sex marriage, creationism, and those who never hear the gospel. Many more questions were submitted than time allowed, suggesting that there is a need for more conferences!
Reactions to the conference have been incredibly positive. Kevin Gordon, from Perth said:

“I think it’s been amazing, I loved that talk about ‘questions’ and how to engage and dialogue with people’s questions and being respectful about it. It’s been so helpful, and I can’t wait to try and apply it, I really can’t!

Central Baptist Church invested a huge amount of time and effort in hosting the 2018 Conference, and were offered a long, heartfelt round of applause from those who had benefited from it.
Morning Coffee BreakRev Jim Turrent, commented: “The reason we hosted this conference is that we think it is a really good thing to do and we think that Dundee is a really good place to do it. We’re excited about the quality of the speakers, and the equipping of the church both here in Dundee, and across Scotland, and the speakers that we have had, have not disappointed – they have been absolutely excellent. What we are hoping and praying is, that the fruit of this conference will be more Confident Christianity and more confident Christians, because they are the key to the re-evangelisation of Scotland, and The North.”
centraldundee.com

Why are religious people such hypocrites?

The religious and people of faith are often accused of being hypocritical; of not living up to the standards we expect of others. In this Short/Answer, Andy Bannister looks into hypocrisy in religion and in the wider society, its roots, the dangers, and the Bible’s answers to our hypocrisy.

Share

Please share this video widely with friends or family and for more Short Answers videos, visit solas-cpc.org/shortanswers/, subscribe to our YouTube channel or visit us on Twitter Instagram or Facebook.

Support

Short Answers is a viewer-supported video series: if you enjoy them, please help us continue to make them by donating to Solas. Visit our Donate page and choose “Digital Media Fund” under the Campaign/Appeal button.

“Exhilarating and Exhausting”: Andy Bannister on Six Days of Mission in Plymouth

I’ve just got back from doing a mission in Plymouth, and it was an amazing week. I spoke 21 times in 6 days and although it was exhausting, it was incredibly exciting!
We were mostly involved in outreach and had the privilege of speaking in schools, in universities, and evangelistic settings, and also on BBC Radio Devon. On top of that, we also squeezed in some evangelism training. There are many wonderful and encouraging stories from Plymouth: here are just a few of the many highlights.
Right at the start of the week a woman came up to speak to me at one of our training events and said, “I really want to thank you and David Robertson for what you did at Creation Fest”. We’d spoken at this festival with 15,000 people earlier in the summer. She said to me, “Andy, I brought my daughter to your seminar, and during the Q&A session, there was one answer you gave which addressed what was, for her, THE stumbling block. She was almost on the verge of walking away from her faith, she was about to give it all up, but what you shared that afternoon was absolutely what she needed to hear – it just turned her life around. She is now on fire for Christ, she is witnessing to her friends… so I wanted to say a big ‘thank you’.”
I love the way that God often works through the Solas team, and we don’t even know it’s happening. So it’s great to hear those stories!
Another highlight was working in schools. I haven’t done schools work for a while, but we had some really wonderful encounters, including great conversations with RS teachers, who appreciated our work. We led lessons in which we took classes through the historical evidence for the resurrection, which was a huge amount of fun! It was exciting to see pupils beginning to realise that: ‘Wow, there are actually reasons why Christians believe these things!” In another lesson I pretended to be an atheist and fired lots of objections at a local pastor, such as: “Faith is just for those who are weak minded, and can’t think”, or “It’s just a psychological crutch”, or “No-one with any brains believes in it”. The pupils had the job of trying to argue against me and there was a fun moment when, frustrated with my attempt to claim all religious people were idiots, a year 11 kid called out, “Wait a minute! Isaac Newton, he was a Christian, and he wasn’t stupid!” So it was just great to be able to see the kids beginning to engage and respond.  Mark Oliver the local organiser, tells me that that our week there has “opened the doors for further school involvement” for the church.
On the Saturday morning at the end of week, we did a men’s breakfast. Every ticket was sold, every seat filled, and about half the audience were not Christians. The topic they had given me to speak on was “The Problem of Happiness”. I talked about the fact we are encouraged to find meaning and purpose and happiness in our job, family, possessions, bank-balance and so forth: but that those things ultimately let us down. Of course, I was able to then ‘land’ the message on the gospel of Jesus Christ and we had really good conversations afterwards. One gentleman told me that his number-one-goal in life had been to pay his mortgage off. He’d worked very long hours for years, and had finally made the last payment. He said: “I was expecting to feel euphoric, that I’d finally achieved this goal. But in fact, I felt completely empty. I suddenly realised that this thing I’d been aiming for, for the last 15 years of my life, just wasn’t what I thought it would be. Now I need to figure out what it’s about.” So we had a really interesting conversation about Jesus, and meaning and identity. This was something hugely exciting to be part of.
Another highlight at Plymouth was a smaller event in a Costa Coffee. It was informal, with about 25 people sat around tables as I answered questions. Most of the audience were Christians, but there was one lady there who had been quiet for the most of the event. Then, right at the end, she came asked a deeply moving question about suffering. She had been a Christian — had abandoned her faith — and for the next 25 minutes, it became a dialogue between me and her; honest question after honest question. After the event two or three women who she knew, continued the conversation and I even saw them praying for her. I love these ‘divine moments’. For me, the whole purpose of that Costa Coffee event, was about that one series of questions from that one lady. I’ve no idea how that story ended; but to see that she was being cared for and her questions addressed was incredible.
The week ended with an invitation to speak on BBC Radio Devon (listen to it here).  I was given an opportunity to speak about Jesus to around 20,000 people; both directly in a talk – but also to ‘share the gospel through contemporary issues’ in their newspaper review.
All this came about because we were invited by one local church, Plymstock Chapel, to come and work in partnership with them for a week. It’s exactly the sort of thing that Solas is here for, what we live for, and love doing!
So that was the exhilarating and exhausting week in Plymouth, and now I need some sleep! Thanks for your prayers and your support for Solas — they make weeks like this possible. Please do consider supporting our work for as little as £3 a month, or inviting the Solas team to your town or city to do a week like this. If one small church in Plymouth can organise a week like this, your church could too!

“I would wholeheartedly recommend a visit from Solas. People need to know there are answers that have been thought-through to questions of life and faith. Young Christians must know their faith is reliable and rational in today’s sceptical world, and we need people like Solas to give them this confidence.”
Mark Oliver, Plymstock Chapel.

Yuval Noah Harari’s ‘Sapiens’ and ‘Homo Deus’ – a depressing view of our Humanity

It was at a party that a friend told me that I should read Sapiens. It explains loads of things, he said, describing how Islamic fundamentalism just comes out of the need for a big story, and implying that he thought it explained away my faith, too.
sapiens PB9781784703936
Sapiens, by Yuval Noah Harari, an Israeli Historian, and its sequel, Homo Deus, have sold well and spread widely.  Published in 2014 and 2016 respectively, at the time of writing they are still at numbers 2 and 6 of Waterstones non-fiction bestsellers chart, and, despite their door-stop size (each just under 500 pages), both have been commended by plenty of famous names, from Barack Obama to Chris Evans. These are popular books which make provocative and significant claims about what it is to be human and how the world works. Christians, take note.
Subtitled ‘A Brief History of Humankind’, Sapiens takes the reader on a breakneck tour of human development, starting at pre-history and ending today.   His writing is as conversational and expansive as his subject, full of opinion and engaging, detailed stories as well as a few facts.  Like many other historians Harari identifies key leaps in progress which changed the course of human history: the movement of early man out of Africa; the discovery of fire; the beginnings of agriculture; the development of written language.  As an atheist he has no sense of why these changes happened.  Big leaps just happen, he seems to say.  Discoveries are made, new skills learned.  But if the why is absent, the how at times is tendentious.
Claiming ‘wheat domesticated us’ as he describes the birth of agriculture, Harari presents an idyllic foraging lifestyle disrupted by the burden of production.  But this gloomy depiction is of a precarious monoculture,  a society depending just on wheat and hard work.   But was that the way farming emerged, was there not a variety of crops and hunting practiced alongside?  And how does he know what life really was like for hunter-gatherers anyway?  Perhaps he is guilty of anthropological romanticism here, as scant archaeological evidence is used to prop up a belief that the primitive is somehow purer than the developed. Worse still is his strange claim that prior to about the fourteenth century AD people didn’t look for knowledge for its own sake – what about Pliny or Archimedes or Galen?  Or again, that prior to the enlightenment writers weren’t interested in feelings – what of Sophocles or Shakespeare or Chaucer?   Whilst cultural shifts in attitude did happen at these times which changed western ways of thinking significantly, Harari is laughably wrong to think in such black and white categories; history is being warped to suit his big ideas.
And what are his big ideas?  Well, they are nothing particularly new (if you have studied humanities or social science in the last thirty years, you’ll think this old hat), but perhaps expressed in a more daring and accessible form than before.  Harari’s confidence in atheistic evolution leads him to conclude that we are no different from any other animal.  No God, no soul, the material is all.  But at the same time, he identifies in us a capacity which sets us apart from other life-forms, saying ‘sapiens could invent socio-political codes that went far beyond the dictates of our DNA and the behaviour patterns of other human and animal species’.  Ironically, he is saying that it is our very capacity to think beyond the material that sets us apart.  The use of language, money, law, nationhood and religion are all examples of these codes, and for Harari they are all convenient fictions.
Although convenient, Harari doesn’t find these myths benign.  They allow humans to progress and cooperate, he says, but they often result in oppression and exploitation.  He picks apart capitalism and Babylonian law, nationalism and individualism (amongst other -isms) deftly, and his observations are at times spot on.  The American declaration of independence which states, “we hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal” rests upon a Christian framework which he finds redundant, truthfully acknowledging, “there are no such things as rights in biology” (123).   Humanism is just another myth he suggests, a type of religion, and so he concludes that his beloved liberalism rests on a lie.  Tellingly he admits: ‘There is no way out of the imagined order.  When we break down our prison walls and run towards freedom, we are in fact running into the more spacious yard of a bigger prison’.   And yet, Harari cannot follow this nihilism through.  He expresses sympathy for human suffering (and even more for animal suffering) and wants to expose untruth, but if meaning is all fabrication, why bother?
Homo Deus, subtitled A Brief History of Tomorrow, repeats many of the ideas in Sapiens and then uses them to predict the future.  Picking up his argument that ‘human behaviour is determined by hormones, genes and synapses rather than free will’ (p263 Sapiens) he neatly and controversially summarises it – we are just algorithms, just a set of rules like a computer program.  Take a pill that increases serotonin level and you feel happy, stimulate certain areas of the brain and you will be calm.   Use an internet search engine and very quickly choices will be presented to you through an algorithim, predicting your preferences and subtly steering you to buy, or believe, or vote.
In this way the division in Harari’s world between what is human and what is not begins to look scarily blurred: robotic limbs and brain implants are just the beginning.   As technology develops, so ways of improving the human condition grow – we can be mini-gods, happy all the time, near-immortal and very powerful.  Life looks as though it is about to get a lot better.  But, says Harari we should be scared of what is round the corner.  A tiny elite which controls technology and so enslaves the rest of us?  Or a non-human super brain – the collection of all knowledge, an internet of all things?  Common to both of these, and in an echo of his argument in Sapiens, is the absence of free will.  Both options sound like science-fiction but are more technologically possible than we realise.   Having depicted these dystopias and argued for a reductive, determinist vision of life, Harari’s ending is abrupt and unexpected.  He asks us to decide the questions: What is life? What is valuable?  What is going to happen to society?  Amazingly (and illogically?), he encourages us to opt out of his conclusions, and choose a different future.
Depressing though these books often are, they do present a great opportunity for debate.  Harari asks at the end of Sapiens, speaking of humanity, “is there anything more dangerous than dissatisfied and irresponsible gods who don’t know what they want” (Sapiens, 466).  When we make ourselves gods, as happened in Eden, framing for ourselves what is truth and goodness, danger ensues.  Christians know that already.   Harari’s rejection of meaning offers no hope for this chaos, but unintentionally points us in the right direction.   We humans desperately need meaning because we are cooperating and communicating persons made in the image of the personal three-in-one God.   We need to know that our values of love and justice and our feelings of pain and compassion are not part of a lifeless algorithm, or a convenient myth, but have significance beyond our brain chemistry.   We need a story, not a fabricated one, but a history, a true story, to make sense of our lives.  And wonderfully the gospel gives us a story that spans past and future as it takes us to the true sapiens, the true homo deus, Jesus Christ.

What is Wrong With the World?

Ask somebody “What’s wrong with the world?” and everybody has an opinion. Everybody thinks *something* is wrong with the world—but what if most people have mistaken the symptoms for the diagnosis? The Christian faith has a lot to say about what the real cause of the world’s problems might be—and also a unique take on what the solution would be. Check out the latest episode of Short Answers, where with unusual help from one of the world’s most famous atheist writers, Andy Bannister explores this question.

This video is used as part of the SU Scotland “Connect Groups Q&A” curriculum.

Share

Please share this video widely with friends or family and for more Short Answers videos, visit solas-cpc.org/shortanswers/, subscribe to our YouTube channel or visit us on Twitter Instagram or Facebook.

Support

Short Answers is a viewer-supported video series: if you enjoy them, please help us continue to make them by donating to Solas. Visit our Donate page and choose “Digital Media Fund” under the Campaign/Appeal button.

 

Believing, belonging, speaking: how true community commends Christianity

It appears that our world is retreating into tribalism, that there is an inexorable shift towards unhelpful varieties of identity politics. Whether it be our carefully selected followers and exemplars on social media, or the increasing polarity between left and right in political and cultural discourse, it seems that ‘them’ and ‘us’ is increasingly the order of the day.
In this article, I want to think out loud about the formation of identity groupings, some of the dynamics which inform them, and where the entity of the local church fits or fails to fit within this mindset. The reflections here are at an early stage of development, and it may well be that I will revisit these themes as my thinking further matures.
For now, here are three observations about identity politics and local ministry:

1. Community versus Coalition: Not all social groupings are the same:

This point is not as obvious as it may appear on a first pass. The varieties of groupings in modern society are not only predicated on what their beliefs are, but on what their basis, their raison d’etre, truly is. German sociologist Ferdinand Tönnies famously divided social ties into two main groups, Gemeinschaft and Gesellschaft, and these distinctions exercised a huge influence on political and social theory throughout the twentieth century. In rough terms, Gemeinschaft are social ties which are based on community, family, true fraternity, whereas Gesellschaft are more mercantile social bonds which exist for mutual advantage or the advancement of a shared external cause. While Tönnies did not necessarily intend all that his terminology has come to represent, we might helpfully transpose and simplify his thinking in terms of our own contemporary contexts.
Modern society abounds with Gesellschaft, and these are often mistaken as being centres of true fealty and belonging. We might anglicise our terms, and describe these groups as being ‘coalitions’*, gatherings or collectives of people who are engaged with one another and with their world for the sake solely of propagating a cause, or producing capital. Co-operation and co-belligerence are the order of the day in coalitions, and the connections which they forge are by no means organic. In fact, coalitions can (and at times must) straddle other, deeper, associations and dogmas, in the name of achieving a shared end.
By contrast, Gemeinschaft might be transposed to describe true community*. In Christian circles community is an overused and under-defined term which can cover how a church talks about small groups, coffee meet-ups, and conversely the world outside of the church which they are seeking to reach. Churches appoint community workers, do community evangelism, but also talk about living in community with one another. For the purposes of this article ‘community’ is a much deeper and more profound connection than any of the uses outlined above. Community in terms of Gemeinschaft more resembles kin than kirk, family than a shared interest group, true belonging rather than simply identifying; a sense of fraternity which transcends common ideals and works its way into a common life, a common love for one another, and a common concern for the welfare of those within (and outside) its bounds.
Distinguishing these two kinds of grouping is vitally important for the rest of what is shared here, but it is important at a much wider level too. If we understand groupings in our society via the wrong category, or we understand our own life and witness in a misguided way, our ability to share the gospel with confidence will be greatly weakened.

2. Coalition can lead to legalism, community should work from love:

Coalitions are extraordinarily attractive to us as human beings. To ‘sign-up’ or ‘turn-up’ for the sake of a cause which a coalition is championing has a certain frisson, a certain social excitement and currency. Marches, protests, petitions, social media picture frames, wristbands, bumper stickers, rallies and so on give the illusion of cohesion and belonging to those who buy into them, and can provide the husk of community without entailing the hard work of truly relating to one another. At times coalitions are needed, and history proves the power for good that they can be (think of the American civil rights movement for example), but they can also breed nominalism and legalism in frightening measures. My concern here is with the church, so an illustration of how these polar responses look in real life might be helpful.
A coalition mentality which embodies nominalism, means that people can identify with causes and issues which the church propounds without really thinking through what belonging to Christ entails, or what belonging to a church requires. This nominalism might be expressed by identifying with a church because of its stance on pro-life issues, or its understanding of marriage, or its concern for social justice, or any number of other contemporary, hot-button issues. For the nominalist the church provides a handy forum wherein they can have their views voiced by a bigger group, or have the edges of their social beliefs shored up, with little effort or true engagement on their part. In this instance the teaching and reception of the gospel becomes secondary to a perception of having a ‘team’, having a group of people who think and act in similar ways, and believe roughly similar things.
A coalition mentality which embodies legalism, is expressed when people make the cause their gospel, and may even be willing to die for it. The cause du jour becomes the central tenet of the individual’s belief system, and issues of the heart, issues of true agape, of ministry, of speaking the truth in love, of truly committing to other Christians are readily jettisoned. There is nothing biblical nor is there anything edifying about a legalistic coalition mentality, but sadly this can be a socially acceptable way to express one’s ‘faith’. The recitation of the shibboleth, the waving of the flag, the wearing of the team uniform are strictly adhered to with no true thought of the deep soul work which the gospel brings.
Community, on the other hand, is predicated on the true bonds of peace that the believer shares with other believers. Fraternity in the Christian church is not some imagined ideal, or some purpose statement bullet-point, but an objective reality which exists between those who enjoy union with Christ. The entry point to this community is not on the grounds of social issues, or co-belligerence, but solely on the gospel of Christ Jesus alone. Community is formed among Christians when the literally crucial elements of Christ’s incarnation, atonement and resurrection are believed on with sincerity, when these tenets are the indicatives which power all of the other imperatives of how Christians relate to their world and to one another. Under these terms Christian community is not a social construct, but a soteriological consequence of becoming a believer, it is something which is not generated by Christians so much as organically enjoyed by them. This is fellowship, this is the communion of the saints, and it is beautifully captured in the early chapters of Acts where those who had repented of their sin and trusted in Christ were devoted to the marks of being a church, and devoted to the members of that church in deep and sacrificial ways. Community outstrips coalition because it has in it a Spirit-given life principle which energises its expression internally, and vivifies its expression externally in evangelism.

3. Believers must speak to their world through community rather than coalition:

The biblical pattern of the church speaking to its world is through local assemblies of believers who live with one another in love, and speak the truth of the gospel with love to their world. If Christians speak to their neighbours and address the public square via the model of coalition then they will be understood as activists in a cause, rather than participants in Christ, and that is a tragic misunderstanding. There is a place for Christian coalition on important public issues, but this was never designed to be our default way of communicating the core message of our faith. Churches which are composed of believers from the same vicinity, which embody the love of Christ which transcends ethnicity and social class, which set themselves to understand the gospel biblically and dogmatically, and who are determined to express the gospel sacrificially and with integrity, are God’s chosen instrument for winning people to the gospel.
As we listen to much of the uncivil discourse that changes hands on social media, as we watch the gradual disengagement of our contemporaries from face-to-face, person-to-person interaction, the church has a powerful opportunity to show what true gospel community is. This might mean that we need to stand down some of our frankly sinful posturing on social media which we have indulged in with the hope of getting some kudos in a virtual coalition. This will certainly mean starting to view the local church not as a network which you are plugged into, but a body which you belong to and which you are fully invested in. This will mean coming to terms with the depth to which the gospel must go in our hearts, and the true ramifications of our union with Christ and, by extension, other believers.
A coalition is easy for our world to reject as just another special interest group. A true Christian community might be despised by the world, but it cannot be ignored or explained by it, and that can be a powerful first step in people coming to Christ themselves.
*I have borrowed the terms ‘coalition’ and ‘community’ as exclusive terms from Jonathan Sachs’ Radio 4 documentary ‘ Morality in the 21st Century’. The terms were cited by an astute sixth former who participated in the programme.

IMG_2001

Andrew Roycroft is pastor of Millisle Baptist Church in Co. Down. N. Ireland

 

God is a ‘Father to the Fatherless’: Phil’s Story.

I’m Phil, and this is my story.
I grew up in the most beautiful Christian family. You know, when I was young, I’d come down in the morning and find both my parents reading their Bibles, that kind of thing. So I was aware of the Christian faith from the very start.
But for me personally, there were various key moments in the development of my own faith. The first of these was when I was six years old, in a big tent somewhere. I remember being told that Jesus loved me, that he had died for me and that I was a naughty boy (I knew I was a naughty boy!!) and that I could go to heaven. And I decided that that was something I wanted to do.
In teenage years you then have to decide whether to keep doing that, keep believing that; and in those years, I kept deciding to follow Jesus.
But the ‘rubber really hit the road’ for me, at University, aged 21. I was studying Law at Sheffield, and during my final year, one Saturday lunchtime, my phone rang; and it was one of my Mum’s friends. And she said words I’ll never forget: she said, “Phil, your Dad has died.” These words just ripped my world apart. But it was a real choice-moment, a faith-defining-moment. I had to decide between angrily rejecting God, for allowing this to happen, or saying “God, I really need you right now”. Our whole family’s story is that we chose the latter and that God’s faithfulness to us has in fact been extraordinary.
I had been a Christian since I was six years old but the closest I have known God was in those first few weeks after Dad died. The words, “When your heart is broken, God is close to you” (Psalm 34:18) really resonate with me…..
My sister was 18 years old and on a gap year, and my brother was just 13; and it was actually my young brother who had found my Dad after he’d died from a heart problem. And that night, my Mum read Psalm 68 “A father to the fatherless, a defender of widows, is God in his holy dwelling.”
Knowing the Bible, and having it in your heart is life-giving. From the age of 11, my Dad used to drive me to Birmingham, from where I’d get the bus out to school, and he used to encourage me to learn Bible verses on the way in the car, which was fantastic! Genesis 1:1 “In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth….” etc etc , all the way through. But for Mum it was that verse in Psalm 68 about God being “A father to the fatherless, a defender of widows” that was so significant.
But you know, reflecting on what I have been through. I would rather have had the Dad that I had for those 21 years, than some other Dads that I’ve come across, who are still around.
A living faith in Jesus is a precious thing to pass on to your children. Christian faith came into our family through my Grandfather. He served in the war in the Isle of Islay – on the West Coast of Scotland (which has since become a lovely holiday haunt for us). He was led to faith there by the Army Chaplain where he was working in a U-boat tracking station. In those days everyone went to church, but the Army chaplain said to him “If it was illegal to be a Christian –would there be enough evidence to convict you?” Those were the words that lead him to faith . Now my Grandfather was a big personality, a real ‘force of nature’, so when he came home on leave – he lead his whole family to Jesus. So that’s my heritage, rooted deeply in a deep love for the Bible.
Life is full of suffering, suffering is everywhere. I’ve just heard yesterday that someone close to me, has less than four years to live. He’s 36 – and he might be dead by Christmas and he has two young children.
This question of suffering is so important for all of us because comfort has become a ‘god’ for so many of us today. Life contains so many things which are just beautiful, but life’s also really hard. So many people today have a complete lack of resilience. I think that comfort is the real enemy for many people, and when suffering comes it completely floors them, because they have no resilience. Romans 5:3, says “because we know that suffering produces perseverance; perseverance, character; and character, hope.” But people who have managed to avoid all suffering and confrontation their whole life, who have managed to be constantly comfortable can fall apart when it suddenly arrives.
The next chapter in my story, is about the extraordinary things which faith in Jesus gives you. Jesus has given me real purpose, meaning and guidance; which are things we don’t talk about enough, but are things we should intentionally discuss. Because if you don’t believe in God, then the best you’ve got is ‘the pursuit of happiness’ and you’re left with some vague sense that the meaning of life might just be to ‘do good and be nice’.
However, for the Christian, there is just so much more than this, which is why I have always been an evangelist. Since the age of six I have wanted to tell people about Jesus. When I was in junior school, I got every boy in my class to come to Boys Brigade. Actually it was every boy in my class except one; and I wept the day that he left because I thought I had missed my opportunity. But my Dad said to me, “you’ve done alright!”, and from then until now – I’ve always just wanted to share my faith.
I finished University a term late, because of Dad dying, and graduated with a law degree, and began looking at jobs and careers. At that point, a director at Youth for Christ, Gav Calver, asked if I would consider joining them. So Gav famously wrecked my promising legal career! If I had followed that route, I would have been a lot richer, but a lot more bored and a lot less fulfilled, I think! I loved working with them. I had an amazing time – on so many weekends away, giving young people fantastic holidays. Over the years we saw thousands of young people give their lives to Jesus – and that was the best bit. We had so many great things, but when you see a kid say yes to Jesus – well, that’s the best bit! So God guides our paths, gives us meaning, purpose, and direction.
But the final part of my story is really that, in the last few years I’ve been having medical tests (because Dad died so young), and it turns out that I have the same heart condition that he did – a dilated aortic root, (if you want the technical term). My brother’s got it too; it’s just one of those inherited conditions. Where having Jesus really makes a difference is this. There are times when I have woken in the night, with my heart going at a rate, and I’ve wondered if I was about to die – and I can’t tell you the difference it makes to know that God is with me in those moments. But also, if my heart does ‘go’, I know where I’m going, and that makes a huge difference too.
The reality is that 14 years on, the Bible’s claim that God is “the father to the fatherless, the defender of widows” has been proved in my family; in our experience. We have been outrageously blessed and protected – and that is the story.

Phil Knox - Copy
Phil Knox is the Head of Mission to Young Adults at The Evangelical Alliance: www.eauk.org